• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

恒河猴与人类的视觉短期记忆比较。

Visual short-term memory compared in rhesus monkeys and humans.

机构信息

Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.

出版信息

Curr Biol. 2011 Jun 7;21(11):975-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.04.031. Epub 2011 May 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.cub.2011.04.031
PMID:21596568
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4634532/
Abstract

Change detection is a popular task to study visual short-term memory (STM) in humans [1-4]. Much of this work suggests that STM has a fixed capacity of 4 ± 1 items [1-6]. Here we report the first comparison of change-detection memory between humans and a species closely related to humans, the rhesus monkey. Monkeys and humans were tested in nearly identical procedures with overlapping display sizes. Although the monkeys' STM was well fit by a one-item fixed-capacity memory model, other monkey memory tests with four-item lists have shown performance impossible to obtain with a one-item capacity [7]. We suggest that this contradiction can be resolved using a continuous-resource approach more closely tied to the neural basis of memory [8, 9]. In this view, items have a noisy memory representation whose noise level depends on display size as a result of the distributed allocation of a continuous resource. In accord with this theory, we show that performance depends on the perceptual distance between items before and after the change, and d' depends on display size in an approximately power-law fashion. Our results open the door to combining the power of psychophysics, computation, and physiology to better understand the neural basis of STM.

摘要

变化检测是研究人类视觉短期记忆(STM)的一项热门任务[1-4]。这项工作表明,STM 的固定容量约为 4±1 项[1-6]。在这里,我们首次比较了人类和与人类密切相关的物种——猕猴之间的变化检测记忆。猴子和人类在几乎相同的程序中进行测试,显示尺寸重叠。尽管猴子的 STM 很好地符合一个固定容量的记忆模型,但其他四项记忆测试表明,使用一项容量不可能获得猴子的表现[7]。我们建议,使用更紧密地与记忆神经基础相关的连续资源方法可以解决这一矛盾[8,9]。在这种观点中,项目具有嘈杂的记忆表示,其噪声水平取决于显示尺寸,这是由于连续资源的分布式分配造成的。与该理论一致,我们表明,性能取决于变化前后项目之间的感知距离,并且 d' 以大约幂律的方式依赖于显示尺寸。我们的结果为结合心理物理学、计算和生理学的力量以更好地理解 STM 的神经基础打开了大门。

相似文献

1
Visual short-term memory compared in rhesus monkeys and humans.恒河猴与人类的视觉短期记忆比较。
Curr Biol. 2011 Jun 7;21(11):975-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.04.031. Epub 2011 May 19.
2
Monkey visual short-term memory directly compared to humans.猴子的视觉短期记忆与人类的直接比较。
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2015 Jan;41(1):32-8. doi: 10.1037/xan0000050. Epub 2014 Nov 24.
3
Comparative cognition: comparing human and monkey memory.比较认知:比较人类和猴子的记忆。
Curr Biol. 2011 Jun 7;21(11):R432-4. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.04.027.
4
Pigeon visual short-term memory directly compared to primates.将鸽子的视觉短期记忆与灵长类动物直接进行比较。
Behav Processes. 2016 Feb;123:84-9. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2015.09.002. Epub 2015 Sep 3.
5
Testing visual short-term memory of pigeons (Columba livia) and a rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta) with a location change detection task.用位置变化检测任务测试鸽子(Columba livia)和猕猴(Macaca mulatta)的视觉短期记忆。
Anim Cogn. 2013 Sep;16(5):839-44. doi: 10.1007/s10071-013-0644-9. Epub 2013 Jun 11.
6
Working memory capacity of crows and monkeys arises from similar neuronal computations.乌鸦和猴子的工作记忆容量源于类似的神经元计算。
Elife. 2021 Dec 3;10:e72783. doi: 10.7554/eLife.72783.
7
Change detection by rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) and pigeons (Columba livia).恒河猴(猕猴)和鸽子(家鸽)的变化检测
J Comp Psychol. 2012 Aug;126(3):203-12. doi: 10.1037/a0026356. Epub 2012 Mar 19.
8
A change detection approach to study visual working memory of the macaque monkey.一种用于研究猕猴视觉工作记忆的变化检测方法。
J Vis. 2011 Mar 14;11(3):11. doi: 10.1167/11.3.11.
9
Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) remember agency information from past events and integrate this knowledge with spatial and temporal features in working memory.恒河猴(猕猴)能记住过去事件中的施动者信息,并将这些知识与工作记忆中的空间和时间特征相结合。
Anim Cogn. 2018 Jan;21(1):137-153. doi: 10.1007/s10071-017-1147-x. Epub 2017 Dec 1.
10
Prototype abstraction by monkeys (Macaca mulatta).猕猴(恒河猴)的原型抽象
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2008 May;137(2):390-401. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.137.2.390.

引用本文的文献

1
Visual short-term memory in action and non-action video game players: A focus on short and long delay intervals.动作类和非动作类电子游戏玩家的视觉短期记忆:聚焦于短期和长期延迟间隔
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025 Jun 23. doi: 10.3758/s13414-025-03118-2.
2
Exploring strategy differences between humans and monkeys with recurrent neural networks.探索使用递归神经网络的人类与猴子之间的策略差异。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2023 Nov 20;19(11):e1011618. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011618. eCollection 2023 Nov.
3
Properties of iconic and visuospatial working memory in pigeons and humans using a location change-detection procedure.

本文引用的文献

1
A change detection approach to study visual working memory of the macaque monkey.一种用于研究猕猴视觉工作记忆的变化检测方法。
J Vis. 2011 Mar 14;11(3):11. doi: 10.1167/11.3.11.
2
Probabilistic population codes for Bayesian decision making.用于贝叶斯决策的概率群体编码。
Neuron. 2008 Dec 26;60(6):1142-52. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.09.021.
3
Dynamic shifts of limited working memory resources in human vision.人类视觉中有限工作记忆资源的动态转移。
鸽子和人类使用位置变化检测程序对表象和视空间工作记忆的特性。
Learn Behav. 2023 Sep;51(3):228-245. doi: 10.3758/s13420-022-00539-z. Epub 2022 Jul 26.
4
Ketamine-Induced Alteration of Working Memory Utility during Oculomotor Foraging Task in Monkeys.氯胺酮诱导猴眼球运动觅食任务中工作记忆效用的改变。
eNeuro. 2021 Apr 6;8(2). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0403-20.2021. Print 2021 Mar-Apr.
5
A Connectomic Hypothesis for the Hominization of the Brain.大脑特化的连接组假说
Cereb Cortex. 2021 Mar 31;31(5):2425-2449. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhaa365.
6
A unified account of numerosity perception.数量感知的统一解释。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Dec;4(12):1265-1272. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-00946-0. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
7
Characterization of Learning, Motivation, and Visual Perception in Five Transgenic Mouse Lines Expressing GCaMP in Distinct Cell Populations.在五个不同细胞群体中表达GCaMP的转基因小鼠品系中学习、动机和视觉感知的特征分析。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2020 Jun 23;14:104. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2020.00104. eCollection 2020.
8
The tenacious brain: How the anterior mid-cingulate contributes to achieving goals.坚韧的大脑:前扣带中部如何有助于实现目标。
Cortex. 2020 Feb;123:12-29. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.09.011. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
9
Establishing an infrastructure for collaboration in primate cognition research.建立灵长类认知研究合作的基础设施。
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 24;14(10):e0223675. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223675. eCollection 2019.
10
Capuchin and rhesus monkeys but not humans show cognitive flexibility in an optional-switch task.卷尾猴和恒河猴表现出认知灵活性,而人类则没有,表现在可选转换任务中。
Sci Rep. 2019 Sep 13;9(1):13195. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-49658-0.
Science. 2008 Aug 8;321(5890):851-4. doi: 10.1126/science.1158023.
4
Spiking networks for Bayesian inference and choice.用于贝叶斯推理和决策的脉冲神经网络
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2008 Apr;18(2):217-22. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2008.07.004. Epub 2008 Aug 21.
5
An assessment of fixed-capacity models of visual working memory.视觉工作记忆的固定容量模型评估
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Apr 22;105(16):5975-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0711295105. Epub 2008 Apr 17.
6
Saccade target selection in the superior colliculus: a signal detection theory approach.上丘中的扫视目标选择:一种信号检测理论方法。
J Neurosci. 2008 Mar 19;28(12):2991-3007. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5424-07.2008.
7
Noise in the nervous system.神经系统中的噪音。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008 Apr;9(4):292-303. doi: 10.1038/nrn2258.
8
An experimental analysis of memory processing.记忆处理的实验分析。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2007 Nov;88(3):405-33. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2007.88-405.
9
Bayesian inference with probabilistic population codes.基于概率群体编码的贝叶斯推理。
Nat Neurosci. 2006 Nov;9(11):1432-8. doi: 10.1038/nn1790. Epub 2006 Oct 22.
10
Coding of visual objects in the ventral stream.腹侧视觉通路中视觉对象的编码
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2006 Aug;16(4):408-14. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2006.06.004. Epub 2006 Jul 7.