Suppr超能文献

恒河猴与人类的视觉短期记忆比较。

Visual short-term memory compared in rhesus monkeys and humans.

机构信息

Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.

出版信息

Curr Biol. 2011 Jun 7;21(11):975-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.04.031. Epub 2011 May 19.

Abstract

Change detection is a popular task to study visual short-term memory (STM) in humans [1-4]. Much of this work suggests that STM has a fixed capacity of 4 ± 1 items [1-6]. Here we report the first comparison of change-detection memory between humans and a species closely related to humans, the rhesus monkey. Monkeys and humans were tested in nearly identical procedures with overlapping display sizes. Although the monkeys' STM was well fit by a one-item fixed-capacity memory model, other monkey memory tests with four-item lists have shown performance impossible to obtain with a one-item capacity [7]. We suggest that this contradiction can be resolved using a continuous-resource approach more closely tied to the neural basis of memory [8, 9]. In this view, items have a noisy memory representation whose noise level depends on display size as a result of the distributed allocation of a continuous resource. In accord with this theory, we show that performance depends on the perceptual distance between items before and after the change, and d' depends on display size in an approximately power-law fashion. Our results open the door to combining the power of psychophysics, computation, and physiology to better understand the neural basis of STM.

摘要

变化检测是研究人类视觉短期记忆(STM)的一项热门任务[1-4]。这项工作表明,STM 的固定容量约为 4±1 项[1-6]。在这里,我们首次比较了人类和与人类密切相关的物种——猕猴之间的变化检测记忆。猴子和人类在几乎相同的程序中进行测试,显示尺寸重叠。尽管猴子的 STM 很好地符合一个固定容量的记忆模型,但其他四项记忆测试表明,使用一项容量不可能获得猴子的表现[7]。我们建议,使用更紧密地与记忆神经基础相关的连续资源方法可以解决这一矛盾[8,9]。在这种观点中,项目具有嘈杂的记忆表示,其噪声水平取决于显示尺寸,这是由于连续资源的分布式分配造成的。与该理论一致,我们表明,性能取决于变化前后项目之间的感知距离,并且 d' 以大约幂律的方式依赖于显示尺寸。我们的结果为结合心理物理学、计算和生理学的力量以更好地理解 STM 的神经基础打开了大门。

相似文献

1
Visual short-term memory compared in rhesus monkeys and humans.恒河猴与人类的视觉短期记忆比较。
Curr Biol. 2011 Jun 7;21(11):975-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.04.031. Epub 2011 May 19.
2
Monkey visual short-term memory directly compared to humans.猴子的视觉短期记忆与人类的直接比较。
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2015 Jan;41(1):32-8. doi: 10.1037/xan0000050. Epub 2014 Nov 24.
4
10
Prototype abstraction by monkeys (Macaca mulatta).猕猴(恒河猴)的原型抽象
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2008 May;137(2):390-401. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.137.2.390.

引用本文的文献

5
A Connectomic Hypothesis for the Hominization of the Brain.大脑特化的连接组假说
Cereb Cortex. 2021 Mar 31;31(5):2425-2449. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhaa365.
6
A unified account of numerosity perception.数量感知的统一解释。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Dec;4(12):1265-1272. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-00946-0. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
9
Establishing an infrastructure for collaboration in primate cognition research.建立灵长类认知研究合作的基础设施。
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 24;14(10):e0223675. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223675. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

2
4
Spiking networks for Bayesian inference and choice.用于贝叶斯推理和决策的脉冲神经网络
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2008 Apr;18(2):217-22. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2008.07.004. Epub 2008 Aug 21.
5
An assessment of fixed-capacity models of visual working memory.视觉工作记忆的固定容量模型评估
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Apr 22;105(16):5975-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0711295105. Epub 2008 Apr 17.
7
Noise in the nervous system.神经系统中的噪音。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008 Apr;9(4):292-303. doi: 10.1038/nrn2258.
8
An experimental analysis of memory processing.记忆处理的实验分析。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2007 Nov;88(3):405-33. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2007.88-405.
9
Bayesian inference with probabilistic population codes.基于概率群体编码的贝叶斯推理。
Nat Neurosci. 2006 Nov;9(11):1432-8. doi: 10.1038/nn1790. Epub 2006 Oct 22.
10
Coding of visual objects in the ventral stream.腹侧视觉通路中视觉对象的编码
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2006 Aug;16(4):408-14. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2006.06.004. Epub 2006 Jul 7.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验