• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将鸽子的视觉短期记忆与灵长类动物直接进行比较。

Pigeon visual short-term memory directly compared to primates.

作者信息

Wright Anthony A, Elmore L Caitlin

机构信息

Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy, University of Texas Health Science Center, The University of Texas Health Science Center Medical School at Houston, 6431 Fannin Street, Suite 7.174, Houston, TX 77030 United States.

Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center Medical School at Houston, United States.

出版信息

Behav Processes. 2016 Feb;123:84-9. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2015.09.002. Epub 2015 Sep 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.beproc.2015.09.002
PMID:26344580
Abstract

Three pigeons were trained to remember arrays of 2-6 colored squares and detect which of two squares had changed color to test their visual short-term memory. Procedures (e.g., stimuli, displays, viewing times, delays) were similar to those used to test monkeys and humans. Following extensive training, pigeons performed slightly better than similarly trained monkeys, but both animal species were considerably less accurate than humans with the same array sizes (2, 4 and 6 items). Pigeons and monkeys showed calculated memory capacities of one item or less, whereas humans showed a memory capacity of 2.5 items. Despite the differences in calculated memory capacities, the pigeons' memory results, like those from monkeys and humans, were all well characterized by an inverse power-law function fit to d' values for the five display sizes. This characterization provides a simple, straightforward summary of the fundamental processing of visual short-term memory (how visual short-term memory declines with memory load) that emphasizes species similarities based upon similar functional relationships. By closely matching pigeon testing parameters to those of monkeys and humans, these similar functional relationships suggest similar underlying processes of visual short-term memory in pigeons, monkeys and humans.

摘要

训练了三只鸽子来记住由2至6个彩色方块组成的阵列,并检测两个方块中哪个颜色发生了变化,以此测试它们的视觉短期记忆。实验程序(如刺激、展示、观看时间、延迟)与用于测试猴子和人类的程序相似。经过大量训练后,鸽子的表现略优于经过类似训练的猴子,但在相同阵列大小(2、4和6个项目)下,这两种动物的准确率都远低于人类。鸽子和猴子的计算记忆容量为一项或更少,而人类的记忆容量为2.5项。尽管计算出的记忆容量存在差异,但鸽子的记忆结果,与猴子和人类的结果一样,都可以通过对五种展示大小的d'值拟合的幂律函数很好地描述。这种描述提供了视觉短期记忆基本处理过程(视觉短期记忆如何随记忆负荷下降)的简单、直接的总结,强调了基于相似功能关系的物种相似性。通过将鸽子的测试参数与猴子和人类的参数紧密匹配,这些相似的功能关系表明鸽子、猴子和人类的视觉短期记忆具有相似的潜在过程。

相似文献

1
Pigeon visual short-term memory directly compared to primates.将鸽子的视觉短期记忆与灵长类动物直接进行比较。
Behav Processes. 2016 Feb;123:84-9. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2015.09.002. Epub 2015 Sep 3.
2
Monkey visual short-term memory directly compared to humans.猴子的视觉短期记忆与人类的直接比较。
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2015 Jan;41(1):32-8. doi: 10.1037/xan0000050. Epub 2014 Nov 24.
3
Functional relationships for investigating cognitive processes.用于研究认知过程的功能关系。
Behav Processes. 2013 Feb;93:4-24. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2012.11.003. Epub 2012 Nov 19.
4
Sensory and working memory in a spatial change-detection task by pigeons and humans.鸽子和人类在空间变化检测任务中的感觉记忆和工作记忆。
Behav Processes. 2019 Dec;169:103957. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2019.103957. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
5
Testing pigeon memory in a change detection task.在变化检测任务中测试鸽子的记忆能力。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2010 Apr;17(2):243-9. doi: 10.3758/PBR.17.2.243.
6
Change detection by rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) and pigeons (Columba livia).恒河猴(猕猴)和鸽子(家鸽)的变化检测
J Comp Psychol. 2012 Aug;126(3):203-12. doi: 10.1037/a0026356. Epub 2012 Mar 19.
7
Conditional same-different discrimination by pigeons: acquisition and generalization to novel and few-item displays.鸽子的条件性相同-不同辨别:对新颖和少量物品展示的习得与泛化
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2010 Jan;36(1):23-38. doi: 10.1037/a0016326.
8
No evidence for feature binding by pigeons in a change detection task.在变化检测任务中,没有证据表明鸽子存在特征捆绑。
Behav Processes. 2016 Feb;123:90-106. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2015.09.007. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
9
Pigeon memory: same/different concept learning, serial probe recognition acquisition, and probe delay effects on the serial-position function.鸽子记忆:相同/不同概念学习、序列探测识别习得以及探测延迟对序列位置函数的影响。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1984 Oct;10(4):498-512.
10
Delayed matching-to-sample: A tool to assess memory and other cognitive processes in pigeons.延迟样本匹配:一种评估鸽子记忆及其他认知过程的工具。
Behav Processes. 2016 Feb;123:26-42. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2015.07.002. Epub 2015 Jul 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Working memory performance is tied to stimulus complexity.工作记忆表现与刺激复杂性有关。
Commun Biol. 2023 Nov 3;6(1):1119. doi: 10.1038/s42003-023-05486-7.
2
Up to the magical number seven: An evolutionary perspective on the capacity of short term memory.直至神奇数字7:短期记忆容量的进化视角
Heliyon. 2021 May 3;7(5):e06955. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06955. eCollection 2021 May.
3
Working Memory as an Indicator for Comparative Cognition - Detecting Qualitative and Quantitative Differences.工作记忆作为比较认知的指标——检测质与量的差异
Front Psychol. 2020 Aug 6;11:1954. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01954. eCollection 2020.
4
Crows Rival Monkeys in Cognitive Capacity.乌鸦在认知能力上可与猴子媲美。
Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 18;7(1):8809. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-09400-0.
5
No evidence for feature binding by pigeons in a change detection task.在变化检测任务中,没有证据表明鸽子存在特征捆绑。
Behav Processes. 2016 Feb;123:90-106. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2015.09.007. Epub 2015 Sep 21.