• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

直接和间接影响两种基于理论的干预措施,以增加在健康体魄健康精神试验中水果和蔬菜的消费。

Direct and mediated effects of two theoretically based interventions to increase consumption of fruits and vegetables in the Healthy Body Healthy Spirit trial.

机构信息

National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892-7326, USA.

出版信息

Health Educ Behav. 2011 Oct;38(5):492-501. doi: 10.1177/1090198110384468. Epub 2011 May 19.

DOI:10.1177/1090198110384468
PMID:21596903
Abstract

This study tested the effects of two theory-based interventions to increase fruit and vegetable intake. Hypothesized intervention mediators included self-efficacy (SE), social support (SS), autonomous motivation (AM), and controlled motivation (CM). At baseline, 1,021 African American adults were recruited from 16 churches randomized to one comparison and two intervention groups: Group 1 (standard educational materials), Group 2 (culturally targeted materials), and Group 3 (culturally targeted materials and telephone-based motivational interviewing). A well-fitted model based on structural equation modeling-χ(2)(df = 541, N = 353, 325) = 864.28, p < .001, normed fit index = .96, nonnormed fit index = .98, comparative fit index = .98, root mean square error of approximation = .042-demonstrated that AM was both a significant mediator and moderator. In the subgroup with low baseline AM, AM mediated 17% of the effect of the Group 3 intervention on fruit and vegetable intake. Conversely, SS, SE, and CM were not significant mediators. Implications related to theory and intervention development are discussed.

摘要

本研究测试了两种基于理论的干预措施对增加水果和蔬菜摄入量的影响。假设的干预中介因素包括自我效能感(SE)、社会支持(SS)、自主动机(AM)和控制动机(CM)。在基线时,从 16 个教堂招募了 1021 名非裔美国成年人,他们被随机分配到一个对照组和两个干预组:组 1(标准教育材料)、组 2(针对文化的材料)和组 3(针对文化的材料和基于电话的动机性访谈)。一个基于结构方程建模的拟合良好的模型-χ²(df = 541,N = 353,325)= 864.28,p <.001,标准化拟合指数 =.96,非标准化拟合指数 =.98,比较拟合指数 =.98,均方根误差近似值 =.042-表明 AM 既是一个重要的中介变量,也是一个调节变量。在基线 AM 较低的亚组中,AM 介导了组 3 干预对水果和蔬菜摄入量的 17%的影响。相反,SS、SE 和 CM 不是重要的中介因素。讨论了与理论和干预发展相关的意义。

相似文献

1
Direct and mediated effects of two theoretically based interventions to increase consumption of fruits and vegetables in the Healthy Body Healthy Spirit trial.直接和间接影响两种基于理论的干预措施,以增加在健康体魄健康精神试验中水果和蔬菜的消费。
Health Educ Behav. 2011 Oct;38(5):492-501. doi: 10.1177/1090198110384468. Epub 2011 May 19.
2
A motivational interviewing intervention to increase fruit and vegetable intake through Black churches: results of the Eat for Life trial.一项通过黑人教会增加水果和蔬菜摄入量的动机性访谈干预措施:“为生命而食”试验的结果。
Am J Public Health. 2001 Oct;91(10):1686-93. doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.10.1686.
3
Psychosocial mediation of fruit and vegetable consumption in the body and soul effectiveness trial.身心效能试验中水果和蔬菜消费的社会心理调节作用
Health Psychol. 2006 Jul;25(4):474-83. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.25.4.474.
4
Associations of psychosocial factors with fruit and vegetable intake among African-Americans.非裔美国人心理社会因素与果蔬摄入量的关联
Public Health Nutr. 2007 Jul;10(7):701-11. doi: 10.1017/S1368980007662284. Epub 2007 Feb 20.
5
Differences in Perceptions of the Food Environment Between African American Men Who Did and Did Not Consume Recommended Levels of Fruits and Vegetables.食用水果和蔬菜达到推荐量与未达到推荐量的非裔美国男性对食物环境认知的差异。
Health Educ Behav. 2016 Dec;43(6):648-655. doi: 10.1177/1090198115626923. Epub 2016 Mar 1.
6
Psychosocial mediators of physical activity and fruit and vegetable consumption in the Faith, Activity, and Nutrition programme.“信念、活动与营养”项目中身体活动及水果和蔬菜消费的心理社会调节因素
Public Health Nutr. 2015 Aug;18(12):2242-50. doi: 10.1017/S1368980014002808. Epub 2014 Dec 8.
7
A quantitative and qualitative approach to understanding fruit and vegetable availability in low-income african-american families with children enrolled in an urban head start program.一种定量与定性相结合的方法,用于了解参与城市学前启蒙计划的低收入非裔美国家庭中儿童可获取的水果和蔬菜情况。
J Am Diet Assoc. 2010 May;110(5):710-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2010.02.012.
8
The Role of Social Support and Self-efficacy for Planning Fruit and Vegetable Intake.社会支持和自我效能在规划果蔬摄入量方面的作用
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2017 Feb;49(2):100-106.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2016.09.005. Epub 2016 Oct 22.
9
Results of the healthy body healthy spirit trial.健康身体与健康精神试验的结果。
Health Psychol. 2005 Jul;24(4):339-48. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.24.4.339.
10
Synergistic effects of social support and self-efficacy on dietary motivation predicting fruit and vegetable intake.社会支持和自我效能感对饮食动机的协同作用预测水果和蔬菜的摄入量。
Appetite. 2015 Apr;87:330-5. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.12.223. Epub 2015 Jan 6.

引用本文的文献

1
The association of motivation and perceived social norms with eating behaviors in emerging adults.新兴成年人中动机和感知到的社会规范与饮食行为的关联。
Health Psychol Behav Med. 2022 Jan 2;10(1):81-91. doi: 10.1080/21642850.2021.2016410. eCollection 2022.
2
Modeling message preferences: an adaptive conjoint analysis of persuasive messaging to increase fruit and vegetable consumption.建模信息偏好:对促进水果和蔬菜消费的说服性信息进行自适应联合分析。
J Commun Healthc. 2016;9(3):164-177. doi: 10.1080/17538068.2016.1238179. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
3
Mediators of intervention effects on dietary fat intake in low-income overweight or obese women with young children.
干预措施对低收入超重或肥胖且有幼儿的妇女脂肪摄入量影响的中介因素。
Appetite. 2020 Aug 1;151:104700. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2020.104700. Epub 2020 Apr 10.
4
Optimizing Tailored Communications for Health Risk Assessment: A Randomized Factorial Experiment of the Effects of Expectancy Priming, Autonomy Support, and Exemplification.优化健康风险评估的个性化沟通:关于期望启动、自主支持和示范作用影响的随机析因实验
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Mar 1;20(3):e63. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7613.
5
Autonomous Motivation and Fruit/Vegetable Intake in Parent-Adolescent Dyads.亲子二元组中的自主动机与果蔬摄入量
Am J Prev Med. 2017 Jun;52(6):863-871. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.01.011.
6
Mediators of Weight Loss Maintenance in the Keep It Off Trial.保持体重减轻试验中的体重维持的调节因素。
Ann Behav Med. 2018 Jan 5;52(1):9-18. doi: 10.1007/s12160-017-9917-x.
7
A comparative effectiveness education trial for lifestyle health behavior change in African Americans.一项针对非裔美国人生活方式健康行为改变的比较效果教育试验。
Health Educ Res. 2017 Jun 1;32(3):207-218. doi: 10.1093/her/cyx039.
8
Targeted mass media interventions promoting healthy behaviours to reduce risk of non-communicable diseases in adult, ethnic minorities.针对成年少数民族群体,通过有针对性的大众媒体干预措施来促进健康行为,以降低非传染性疾病风险。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 17;2(2):CD011683. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011683.pub2.
9
LA Sprouts: A 12-Week Gardening, Nutrition, and Cooking Randomized Control Trial Improves Determinants of Dietary Behaviors.洛杉矶新芽计划:一项为期12周的园艺、营养与烹饪随机对照试验改善了饮食行为的决定因素。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2016 Jan;48(1):2-11.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2015.08.009. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
10
Psychosocial Characteristics Associated with Both Antiretroviral Therapy Adherence and Risk Behaviors in Women Living with HIV.与感染艾滋病毒女性的抗逆转录病毒治疗依从性和风险行为相关的心理社会特征
AIDS Behav. 2016 May;20(5):1084-96. doi: 10.1007/s10461-015-1209-5.