National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892-7326, USA.
Health Educ Behav. 2011 Oct;38(5):492-501. doi: 10.1177/1090198110384468. Epub 2011 May 19.
This study tested the effects of two theory-based interventions to increase fruit and vegetable intake. Hypothesized intervention mediators included self-efficacy (SE), social support (SS), autonomous motivation (AM), and controlled motivation (CM). At baseline, 1,021 African American adults were recruited from 16 churches randomized to one comparison and two intervention groups: Group 1 (standard educational materials), Group 2 (culturally targeted materials), and Group 3 (culturally targeted materials and telephone-based motivational interviewing). A well-fitted model based on structural equation modeling-χ(2)(df = 541, N = 353, 325) = 864.28, p < .001, normed fit index = .96, nonnormed fit index = .98, comparative fit index = .98, root mean square error of approximation = .042-demonstrated that AM was both a significant mediator and moderator. In the subgroup with low baseline AM, AM mediated 17% of the effect of the Group 3 intervention on fruit and vegetable intake. Conversely, SS, SE, and CM were not significant mediators. Implications related to theory and intervention development are discussed.
本研究测试了两种基于理论的干预措施对增加水果和蔬菜摄入量的影响。假设的干预中介因素包括自我效能感(SE)、社会支持(SS)、自主动机(AM)和控制动机(CM)。在基线时,从 16 个教堂招募了 1021 名非裔美国成年人,他们被随机分配到一个对照组和两个干预组:组 1(标准教育材料)、组 2(针对文化的材料)和组 3(针对文化的材料和基于电话的动机性访谈)。一个基于结构方程建模的拟合良好的模型-χ²(df = 541,N = 353,325)= 864.28,p <.001,标准化拟合指数 =.96,非标准化拟合指数 =.98,比较拟合指数 =.98,均方根误差近似值 =.042-表明 AM 既是一个重要的中介变量,也是一个调节变量。在基线 AM 较低的亚组中,AM 介导了组 3 干预对水果和蔬菜摄入量的 17%的影响。相反,SS、SE 和 CM 不是重要的中介因素。讨论了与理论和干预发展相关的意义。