Kjølberg Kamilla Lein, Strand Roger
Centre for the Study of the Sciences and the Humanities, University of Bergen, P.O. Box 7805, 5020 Bergen, Norway.
Nanoethics. 2011 Apr;5(1):99-113. doi: 10.1007/s11569-011-0114-2. Epub 2011 Apr 3.
There is currently a strong focus on responsible research in relation to the development of nanoscience and nanotechnology. This study presents a series of conversations with nanoresearchers, with the 'European Commission recommendation on a code of conduct for responsible nanosciences and nanotechnologies research' (EC-CoC) as its point of departure. Six types of reactions to the document are developed, illustrating the diversity existing within the scientific community in responses towards this kind of new approaches to governance. Three broad notions of responsible nanoresearch are presented. The article concludes by arguing that while the suggestion put forward in the EC-CoC brings the concept of responsible nanoresearch a long way, one crucial element is to be wanted, namely responsible nanoresearch as increased awareness of moral choices.
目前,纳米科学和纳米技术的发展十分注重负责任的研究。本研究呈现了与纳米研究人员的一系列对话,以“欧盟委员会关于负责任的纳米科学和纳米技术研究行为准则的建议”(EC-CoC)为出发点。文中阐述了对该文件的六种反应类型,说明了科学界对这种新型治理方法的反应存在多样性。还提出了负责任的纳米研究的三个宽泛概念。文章最后指出,虽然EC-CoC中提出的建议使负责任的纳米研究概念有了很大进展,但仍缺少一个关键要素,即负责任的纳米研究应提高对道德选择的认识。