• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

科学治理中的想象中的科学家。

The imagined scientist of science governance.

机构信息

Department of Sociology and Political Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway.

Department of Interdisciplinary Studies of Culture, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway.

出版信息

Soc Stud Sci. 2021 Apr;51(2):277-297. doi: 10.1177/0306312720962573. Epub 2020 Oct 17.

DOI:10.1177/0306312720962573
PMID:33070697
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8010896/
Abstract

In this article, we introduce the concept of 'the imagined scientist'. It inverts previous discussions of the public as an imagined community with a knowledge deficit, to examine imagined scientists representing an actor (or group of actors) with deficits in knowledge or concern about social issues. We study how Norwegian science policymakers, on the one hand, and biotechnologists and nanotechnologists, on the other, articulate and engage with social responsibility. The article identifies what we call 'deficit trouble', when there is poor alignment of the deficits of different imagined scientists, which may lead to a stalemate in the communication between science policymakers and scientists. We argue that 'the imagined scientist' can function as sensitizing concept for further studies of science governance across a range of topics, bringing into view how different deficit logics operate in science policy.

摘要

在本文中,我们介绍了“想象中的科学家”的概念。它颠覆了以往将公众视为知识匮乏的想象共同体的讨论,转而研究代表知识或对社会问题关注不足的行为体(或行为体群体)的想象中的科学家。我们研究了一方面的挪威科学政策制定者,以及生物技术专家和纳米技术专家,如何阐述和参与社会责任。本文确定了我们称之为“缺陷困境”的情况,即不同想象中的科学家的缺陷之间存在不良的一致性,这可能导致科学政策制定者和科学家之间的沟通陷入僵局。我们认为,“想象中的科学家”可以作为一个敏感概念,用于进一步研究跨一系列主题的科学治理,揭示不同的缺陷逻辑在科学政策中的运作方式。

相似文献

1
The imagined scientist of science governance.科学治理中的想象中的科学家。
Soc Stud Sci. 2021 Apr;51(2):277-297. doi: 10.1177/0306312720962573. Epub 2020 Oct 17.
2
Devices of Responsibility: Over a Decade of Responsible Research and Innovation Initiatives for Nanotechnologies.责任装置:十余年纳米技术负责任研究与创新倡议
Sci Eng Ethics. 2018 Dec;24(6):1719-1746. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9978-z. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
3
Moral responsibility and the 'ignorant scientist'.道德责任与“无知的科学家”。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2000 Jul;6(3):341-9. doi: 10.1007/s11948-000-0036-9.
4
Figuring the 'cynical scientist' in British animal science: the politics of invisibility.剖析英国动物科学领域中“愤世嫉俗的科学家”形象:隐形的政治
Biosocieties. 2023;18(4):780-800. doi: 10.1057/s41292-023-00312-z. Epub 2023 Sep 26.
5
Caring for nanotechnology? Being an integrated social scientist.关注纳米技术?成为一名综合社会科学家。
Soc Stud Sci. 2015 Oct;45(5):642-64. doi: 10.1177/0306312715598666.
6
Scientific Citizenship and good governance: implications for biotechnology.科学公民身份与善治:对生物技术的影响
Trends Biotechnol. 2006 Feb;24(2):57-61. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2005.12.007. Epub 2005 Dec 27.
7
Lab work goes social, and vice versa: strategising public engagement processes : commentary on: "What happens in the lab does not stay in the lab: applying midstream modulation to enhance critical reflection in the laboratory".实验室工作走向社交化,反之亦然:规划公众参与流程的策略:评论:“实验室里发生的事情不会留在实验室里:应用中游调节来增强实验室中的批判性反思”。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2011 Dec;17(4):791-800. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9316-9. Epub 2011 Oct 21.
8
The Ethical Challenges of Socially Responsible Science.社会责任科学的伦理挑战。
Account Res. 2016;23(1):31-46. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2014.1002608.
9
Scientists' Ethical Obligations and Social Responsibility for Nanotechnology Research.科学家在纳米技术研究中的伦理义务和社会责任。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Feb;22(1):111-32. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9637-1. Epub 2015 Feb 27.
10
The lure of rationality: Why does the deficit model persist in science communication?理性的诱惑:为何缺陷模型在科学传播中持续存在?
Public Underst Sci. 2016 May;25(4):400-14. doi: 10.1177/0963662516629749.

本文引用的文献

1
Ethics as ritual: smoothing over moments of dislocation in biomedicine.伦理作为仪式:抚平生物医学中的错位时刻。
Sociol Health Illn. 2019 Mar;41(3):455-469. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12818. Epub 2018 Sep 10.
2
Experiments in interdisciplinarity: Responsible research and innovation and the public good.跨学科实验:负责任的研究与创新和公共利益。
PLoS Biol. 2018 Mar 26;16(3):e2003921. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2003921. eCollection 2018 Mar.
3
Technoscience, imagined publics and public imaginations.技术科学、想象的公众与公众想象
Public Underst Sci. 2017 Feb;26(2):133-147. doi: 10.1177/0963662516663057.
4
Why should we promote public engagement with science?我们为什么要促进公众参与科学?
Public Underst Sci. 2014 Jan;23(1):4-15. doi: 10.1177/0963662513518154.
5
Conversations About Responsible Nanoresearch.关于负责任的纳米研究的对话。
Nanoethics. 2011 Apr;5(1):99-113. doi: 10.1007/s11569-011-0114-2. Epub 2011 Apr 3.