Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
Environ Monit Assess. 2012 Mar;184(3):1603-16. doi: 10.1007/s10661-011-2064-0. Epub 2011 May 21.
Environmental agencies across the United States have searched for adequate methods to assess anthropogenic impacts on the environment. Biological assessments, which compare the taxonomic composition of an aquatic assemblage to relevant biocriteria, have surfaced as an effective method to assess the ecological integrity of US waterbodies. In this study, bioassessment data were collected and analyzed in conjunction with physical habitat and chemical stressor data for streams and rivers within the San Diego basin from 1998 through 2005. Physical stressors such as sediment loading, riparian destruction, and in-stream habitat homogenization affect many locations in the region. However, physical habitat measures alone were found to frequently overestimate the biological integrity of streams in the region. Many sites within the San Diego Basin, although unaffected by physical stressors, continue to exhibit low biological integrity scores. Sites with low biological integrity tend to possess higher specific conductance and salinity compared to sites with high biological integrity. We suggest that one possible reason for these differences is the source water used for municipal purposes.
美国各地的环境机构一直在寻找评估人为因素对环境影响的适当方法。生物评估是一种将水生生物群落的分类组成与相关生物标准进行比较的方法,已成为评估美国水体生态完整性的有效方法。在这项研究中,1998 年至 2005 年期间,在圣地亚哥流域的溪流和河流中收集并分析了生物评估数据,以及物理生境和化学胁迫数据。沉积物负荷、河岸破坏和溪流生境均质化等物理胁迫因子影响着该地区的许多地方。然而,仅物理生境措施被发现经常高估该地区溪流的生物完整性。圣地亚哥流域内的许多地点虽然没有受到物理胁迫的影响,但仍表现出较低的生物完整性得分。生物完整性得分较低的地点往往比生物完整性得分较高的地点具有更高的比电导率和盐度。我们认为造成这些差异的一个可能原因是用于市政目的的水源。