• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年期的人格特质:测量、等级稳定性及一些平均水平的变化。

Personality traits in old age: measurement and rank-order stability and some mean-level change.

机构信息

Centre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology.

出版信息

Psychol Aging. 2012 Mar;27(1):243-249. doi: 10.1037/a0023690. Epub 2011 May 23.

DOI:10.1037/a0023690
PMID:21604884
Abstract

Lothian Birth Cohorts, 1936 and 1921 were used to study the longitudinal comparability of Five-Factor Model (McCrae & John, 1992) personality traits from ages 69 to 72 years and from ages 81 to 87 years, and cross-cohort comparability between ages 69 and 81 years. Personality was measured using the 50-item International Personality Item Pool (Goldberg, 1999). Satisfactory measurement invariance was established across time and cohorts. High rank-order stability was observed in both cohorts. Almost no mean-level change was observed in the younger cohort, whereas Extraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, and Intellect declined significantly in the older cohort. The older cohort scored higher on Agreeableness and Conscientiousness. In these cohorts, individual differences in personality traits continued to be stable even in very old age, mean-level changes accelerated.

摘要

洛锡安出生队列(Lothian Birth Cohorts)1936 年组和 1921 年组被用于研究从 69 岁到 72 岁以及从 81 岁到 87 岁期间五因素模型(McCrae & John, 1992)人格特质的纵向可比性,以及 69 岁和 81 岁之间的跨队列可比性。人格特质使用 50 项国际人格项目池(International Personality Item Pool, Goldberg, 1999)进行测量。在时间和队列方面,都建立了令人满意的测量不变性。两个队列都观察到了高度的等级稳定性。在年轻队列中,几乎没有观察到平均水平的变化,而在外向性、宜人性、尽责性和智力方面,老年队列则显著下降。老年队列在宜人性和尽责性方面的得分更高。在这些队列中,即使在非常高龄时,人格特质的个体差异仍保持稳定,平均水平的变化加速。

相似文献

1
Personality traits in old age: measurement and rank-order stability and some mean-level change.老年期的人格特质:测量、等级稳定性及一些平均水平的变化。
Psychol Aging. 2012 Mar;27(1):243-249. doi: 10.1037/a0023690. Epub 2011 May 23.
2
Long-term correlated change in personality traits in old age.老年期人格特质的长期相关变化。
Psychol Aging. 2008 Sep;23(3):545-57. doi: 10.1037/a0013239.
3
Aging: empirical contribution. A longitudinal analysis of personality disorder dimensions and personality traits in a community sample of older adults: perspectives from selves and informants.衰老:实证贡献。一项对老年人社区样本的人格障碍维度和人格特质的纵向分析:来自自我和知情者的观点。
J Pers Disord. 2014 Feb;28(1):151-65. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2014.28.1.151.
4
Personality development across the life span: longitudinal analyses with a national sample from Germany.人格发展贯穿一生:德国全国样本的纵向分析。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Oct;101(4):847-61. doi: 10.1037/a0024298.
5
Stability and change in the Big Five personality domains: evidence from a longitudinal study of Australians.大五人格领域的稳定性和变化:来自澳大利亚纵向研究的证据。
Psychol Aging. 2012 Dec;27(4):867-74. doi: 10.1037/a0029322. Epub 2012 Jul 9.
6
Stability and change of personality across the life course: the impact of age and major life events on mean-level and rank-order stability of the Big Five.人格在整个生命历程中的稳定性和变化:年龄和重大生活事件对五大人格特质的均数稳定性和等级稳定性的影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Oct;101(4):862-82. doi: 10.1037/a0024950.
7
Patterns and sources of personality development in old age.老年期人格发展的模式与根源。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015 Jul;109(1):175-91. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000028. Epub 2014 Dec 29.
8
Personality in advanced old age: continuity or change?
J Gerontol. 1991 Nov;46(6):P299-308. doi: 10.1093/geronj/46.6.p299.
9
Differential stability and individual growth trajectories of big five and affective traits during young adulthood.青年期大五人格特质和情感特质的差异稳定性及个体成长轨迹
J Pers. 2008 Apr;76(2):267-304. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2007.00486.x. Epub 2008 Mar 5.
10
A new look at the big five factor structure through exploratory structural equation modeling.通过探索性结构方程建模重新审视大五因素结构。
Psychol Assess. 2010 Sep;22(3):471-91. doi: 10.1037/a0019227.

引用本文的文献

1
Does personality always matter for health? Examining the moderating effect of age on the personality-health link from life span developmental and aging perspectives.人格对健康总是很重要吗?从寿命发展和老龄化的角度来看,检验年龄对人格-健康关系的调节作用。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2023 Nov;125(5):1189-1206. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000485.
2
The associations between personality traits and quality of life, satisfaction with life, and well-being over time in people with dementia and their caregivers: findings from the IDEAL programme.痴呆患者及其照料者的人格特质与生活质量、生活满意度和幸福感随时间的关系:来自 IDEAL 项目的研究结果。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Jun 6;23(1):354. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04075-x.
3
Individual and generational value change in an adult population, a 12-year longitudinal panel study.
成人人群中个体和代际价值观的变化:一项为期 12 年的纵向面板研究。
Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 25;12(1):17844. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-22862-1.
4
Awareness of Age-Related Changes Among Middle-Aged and Older Adults: Longitudinal Trajectories, and the Role of Age Stereotypes and Personality Traits.中老年成年人对与年龄相关变化的认知:纵向轨迹以及年龄刻板印象和人格特质的作用。
Front Psychiatry. 2022 May 25;13:902909. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.902909. eCollection 2022.
5
Averting the Next Credibility Crisis in Psychological Science: Within-Person Methods for Personalized Diagnostics and Intervention.避免心理科学领域的下一次可信度危机:用于个性化诊断和干预的个体内方法
J Pers Oriented Res. 2022 Jan 7;7(2):53-77. doi: 10.17505/jpor.2021.23795. eCollection 2021.
6
Trajectories of Pain in Very Old Age: The Role of Eudaimonic Wellbeing and Personality.高龄老人的疼痛轨迹:幸福感与人格的作用。
Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2022 Feb 24;3:807179. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2022.807179. eCollection 2022.
7
Patterns of cumulative continuity and maturity in personality and well-being: Evidence from a large longitudinal sample of adults.人格与幸福感的累积连续性和成熟模式:来自大量成年人纵向样本的证据。
Pers Individ Dif. 2021 Feb 1;169. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2019.109737. Epub 2019 Dec 7.
8
The power of personality in successful ageing: a comprehensive review of larger quantitative studies.成功老龄化中个性的力量:对大型定量研究的全面综述
Eur J Ageing. 2020 Jul 19;18(2):269-285. doi: 10.1007/s10433-020-00575-6. eCollection 2021 Jun.
9
The Russian scientists' quality of life and cognitive status.俄罗斯科学家的生活质量和认知状况。
Eur J Transl Myol. 2021 Jun 16;31(2):9744. doi: 10.4081/ejtm.2021.9744.
10
Eye Tracking in the Wild: Piloting a Real-Life Assessment Paradigm for Older Adults.现实环境中的眼动追踪:为老年人试行一种现实生活评估范式
J Eye Mov Res. 2019 May 24;12(1). doi: 10.16910/jemr.12.1.4.