Kandler Christian, Kornadt Anna E, Hagemeyer Birk, Neyer Franz J
Department of Psychology, Bielefeld University.
Institute of Psychology, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015 Jul;109(1):175-91. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000028. Epub 2014 Dec 29.
Despite abundant evidence that personality development continues in adulthood, little is known about the patterns and sources of personality development in old age. We thus investigated mean-level trends and individual differences in change as well as the genetic and environmental sources of rank-order continuity and change in several personality traits (neuroticism, extraversion, openness, agreeableness, conscientiousness, perceived control, and affect intensity) and well-being. In addition, we analyzed the interrelation between perceived control and change in other personality traits as well as between change in personality traits and change in well-being. We analyzed data from older adult twins, aged 64-85 years at Time 1 (N = 410; 135 males and 275 females; 134 monozygotic and 63 dizygotic twin pairs), collected at 2 different time points about 5 years apart. On average, neuroticism increased, whereas extraversion, conscientiousness, and perceived control significantly decreased over time. Change in perceived control was associated with change in neuroticism and conscientiousness, pointing to particular adaptation mechanisms specific to old age. Whereas individual differences in personality traits were fairly stable due to both genetic and environmental sources, individual differences in change were primarily due to environmental sources (beyond random error) indicating plasticity in old age. Even though the average level of well-being did not significantly change over time, individual well-being tended to decrease with strongly increasing levels of neuroticism as well as decreasing extraversion, conscientiousness, and perceived control, indicating that personality traits predict well-being but not vice versa. We discuss implications for theory on personality development across the lifespan.
尽管有大量证据表明人格发展在成年期仍在继续,但对于老年人人格发展的模式和根源却知之甚少。因此,我们研究了几个个性特征(神经质、外向性、开放性、宜人性、尽责性、感知控制和情感强度)以及幸福感的平均水平趋势、变化中的个体差异,以及等级顺序连续性和变化的遗传和环境根源。此外,我们分析了感知控制与其他个性特征变化之间的相互关系,以及个性特征变化与幸福感变化之间的相互关系。我们分析了来自64 - 85岁老年双胞胎的数据,这些数据在两个不同时间点收集,时间间隔约为5年(时间1时N = 410;135名男性和275名女性;134对同卵双胞胎和63对异卵双胞胎)。平均而言,神经质随时间增加,而外向性、尽责性和感知控制随时间显著下降。感知控制的变化与神经质和尽责性的变化相关,这表明了老年特有的特定适应机制。虽然个性特征的个体差异由于遗传和环境根源而相当稳定,但变化中的个体差异主要归因于环境根源(超出随机误差),这表明老年期具有可塑性。尽管幸福感的平均水平随时间没有显著变化,但个体幸福感往往随着神经质水平的大幅上升以及外向性、尽责性和感知控制的下降而降低,这表明个性特征可以预测幸福感,但反之则不然。我们讨论了这些结果对毕生人格发展理论的启示。