• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多模态磁共振成像联合游离前列腺特异性抗原与总前列腺特异性抗原比值在前列腺癌检测中的应用

Usefulness of prebiopsy multifunctional and morphologic MRI combined with free-to-total prostate-specific antigen ratio in the detection of prostate cancer.

机构信息

Department of MRI, Clínica Girona, Lorenzana 36, Girona 17002, Spain.

出版信息

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Jun;196(6):W715-22. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.5700.

DOI:10.2214/AJR.10.5700
PMID:21606259
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the study was to assess the predictive value for prostate cancer of MRI using morphologic (T2-weighted imaging [T2WI]) and functional (MR spectroscopy [MRS], diffusion-weighted imaging [DWI], and dynamic contrast-enhanced [DCE] MRI) sequences and the free-to-total prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ratio, alone and combined.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 70 patients (PSA level, > 4 ng/mL; free-to-total PSA ratio, < 20%) who underwent endorectal 1.5-T MRI before biopsy. We graded the likelihood of cancer on a 5-point scale. Imaging data were compared with histologic results on biopsy or prostatectomy. Accuracies were estimated from the area under receiver operating characteristic using the hemiprostate as the unit of analysis. A p value less than 0.05 denoted statistical significance.

RESULTS

The model combining all variables was more accurate than each variable alone (95.2% vs 73.5% for T2WI, 76.0% for MRS, 81.8% for DWI, 75.6% for DCE-MRI, and 78.8% for free-to-total PSA ratio). The complete model had accuracy similar to that of combining two imaging variables with free-to-total PSA ratio, especially free-to-total PSA ratio, T2WI, and DWI (94.0%); and free-to-total PSA ratio, DWI, and MRS (93.8%); with negative predictive values of 91.0% and 89.5%, respectively. The best models combining two imaging variables (MRS and DWI, 85.8%; T2WI and DWI, 84.8%) had accuracy that was similar to that of the combination of all imaging variables (87.3%) and higher than that of the best individual imaging variable (DWI, 81.8%), but lower than that of the complete model.

CONCLUSION

The combination of at least one functional technique with free-to-total PSA ratio is more accurate than combining only imaging variables in cancer detection. The use of more than two imaging variables does not increase the detection rate. Functional MRI has the potential to help avoid a large number of negative biopsies.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估 MRI 形态学(T2 加权成像 [T2WI])和功能学(磁共振波谱 [MRS]、弥散加权成像 [DWI]和动态对比增强 [DCE] MRI)序列以及游离前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)与总 PSA 比值(f/t PSA)单独及联合预测前列腺癌的价值。

材料与方法

本回顾性研究纳入 70 例(PSA 水平>4ng/ml;f/t PSA 比值<20%)患者,所有患者均在前列腺穿刺活检前行直肠内 1.5T MRI 检查。我们对癌症的可能性进行了 5 分制评分。对影像学数据和活检或前列腺切除术的组织学结果进行比较。采用半前列腺作为分析单位,通过接受者操作特征曲线下面积来评估准确性。p 值<0.05 表示有统计学意义。

结果

与单独变量相比,联合所有变量的模型更准确(T2WI 为 95.2%比 73.5%,MRS 为 76.0%,DWI 为 81.8%,DCE-MRI 为 75.6%,f/t PSA 比值为 78.8%)。完整模型的准确性与联合两种影像学变量加 f/t PSA 比值相似,尤其是联合 f/t PSA 比值、T2WI 和 DWI(94.0%)以及 f/t PSA 比值、DWI 和 MRS(93.8%),阴性预测值分别为 91.0%和 89.5%。联合两种影像学变量(MRS 和 DWI,85.8%;T2WI 和 DWI,84.8%)的最佳模型准确性与联合所有影像学变量(87.3%)相似,且高于最佳单一影像学变量(DWI,81.8%),但低于完整模型。

结论

至少联合一种功能技术和 f/t PSA 比值比单纯联合影像学变量在癌症检测中更准确。使用两种以上影像学变量不会增加检出率。功能 MRI 具有帮助避免大量阴性活检的潜力。

相似文献

1
Usefulness of prebiopsy multifunctional and morphologic MRI combined with free-to-total prostate-specific antigen ratio in the detection of prostate cancer.多模态磁共振成像联合游离前列腺特异性抗原与总前列腺特异性抗原比值在前列腺癌检测中的应用
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Jun;196(6):W715-22. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.5700.
2
Peripheral zone prostate cancer localization by multiparametric magnetic resonance at 3 T: unbiased cancer identification by matching to histopathology.3T 多参数磁共振前列腺外周带癌定位:与组织病理学匹配的无偏癌识别。
Invest Radiol. 2012 Nov;47(11):624-33. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e318263f0fd.
3
Detection of prostate cancer with magnetic resonance imaging: optimization of T1-weighted, T2-weighted, dynamic-enhanced T1-weighted, diffusion-weighted imaging apparent diffusion coefficient mapping sequences and MR spectroscopy, correlated with biopsy and histopathological findings.磁共振成像检测前列腺癌:T1加权、T2加权、动态增强T1加权、扩散加权成像表观扩散系数图序列及磁共振波谱的优化,与活检及组织病理学结果相关
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2012 Jan-Feb;36(1):30-45. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e31823f6263.
4
Prostate cancer detection: comparison of T2-weighted imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging, and the three techniques combined.前列腺癌检测:T2加权成像、扩散加权成像、质子磁共振波谱成像及三种技术联合应用的比较
Acta Radiol. 2008 Jun;49(5):602-10. doi: 10.1080/02841850802004983.
5
Comparative sensitivities of functional MRI sequences in detection of local recurrence of prostate carcinoma after radical prostatectomy or external-beam radiotherapy.功能磁共振成像序列检测前列腺癌根治术后或外照射放疗后局部复发的比较敏感性。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Apr;200(4):W361-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.9106.
6
Prostate cancer detection in patients with total serum prostate-specific antigen levels of 4-10 ng/mL: diagnostic efficacy of diffusion-weighted imaging, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, and T2-weighted imaging.血清总前列腺特异性抗原水平在 4-10ng/mL 的患者中的前列腺癌检测:扩散加权成像、动态对比增强 MRI 和 T2 加权成像的诊断效能。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Sep;197(3):664-70. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.5923.
7
Prostate cancer screening: the clinical value of diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic MR imaging in combination with T2-weighted imaging.前列腺癌筛查:扩散加权成像及动态磁共振成像联合T2加权成像的临床价值
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Jan;25(1):146-52. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20793.
8
Peripheral zone prostate cancer in patients with elevated PSA levels and low free-to-total PSA ratio: detection with MR imaging and MR spectroscopy.前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平升高且游离 PSA 与总 PSA 比值低的患者外周带前列腺癌:磁共振成像和磁共振波谱检测
Radiology. 2009 Oct;253(1):135-43. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2531082049. Epub 2009 Jul 31.
9
Evaluation of the prostate imaging reporting and data system for the detection of prostate cancer by the results of targeted biopsy of the prostate.前列腺影像报告和数据系统在前列腺靶向活检检测前列腺癌中的应用评价。
Invest Radiol. 2014 Jun;49(6):411-20. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000030.
10
Prostate cancer detection with 3 T MRI: comparison of diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in combination with T2-weighted imaging.3T MRI 检测前列腺癌:扩散加权成像与动态对比增强 MRI 联合 T2 加权成像的比较。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010 Mar;31(3):625-31. doi: 10.1002/jmri.22075.

引用本文的文献

1
Biparametric MRI-based radiomics for differentiating clinically significant prostate cancer among prostate-specific antigen level of gray zone.基于双参数MRI的影像组学在前列腺特异性抗原水平处于灰色地带时鉴别临床显著性前列腺癌中的应用
Front Oncol. 2025 Aug 27;15:1615005. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1615005. eCollection 2025.
2
Biparametric MRI-based radiomics for prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer of PI-RADS category 3 lesions.基于双参数磁共振成像的影像组学用于预测PI-RADS 3类病变中具有临床意义的前列腺癌。
BMC Cancer. 2025 Apr 5;25(1):615. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14022-1.
3
PI-RADS v2.1 and PSAD for the prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer among patients with PSA levels of 4-10 ng/ml.
PI-RADS v2.1 和 PSAD 用于预测 PSA 水平在 4-10ng/ml 之间的患者中具有临床意义的前列腺癌。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 19;14(1):6570. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-57337-y.
4
A nomogram based on biparametric magnetic resonance imaging for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naïve patients.基于双参数磁共振成像的列线图在初诊前列腺穿刺活检患者中检测临床显著前列腺癌的应用。
Cancer Imaging. 2023 Sep 4;23(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s40644-023-00606-2.
5
Inter-reader agreement of the prostate imaging reporting and data system version v2.1 for detection of prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.前列腺影像报告和数据系统v2.1版在前列腺癌检测方面的阅片者间一致性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Oncol. 2022 Sep 29;12:1013941. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1013941. eCollection 2022.
6
Simplified PI-RADS (S-PI-RADS) for biparametric MRI to detect and manage prostate cancer: What urologists need to know.用于双参数磁共振成像检测和管理前列腺癌的简化前列腺影像报告和数据系统(S-PI-RADS):泌尿科医生需要了解的内容。
Turk J Urol. 2021 May;47(3):175-182. doi: 10.5152/tud.2021.21004.
7
Is dynamic contrast enhancement still necessary in multiparametric magnetic resonance for diagnosis of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.在多参数磁共振成像中,动态对比增强对于前列腺癌诊断是否仍有必要:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Transl Androl Urol. 2020 Apr;9(2):553-573. doi: 10.21037/tau.2020.02.03.
8
Current status and future prospective of focal therapy for localized prostate cancer: development of multiparametric MRI, MRI-TRUS fusion image-guided biopsy, and treatment modalities.局限性前列腺癌局部治疗的现状和未来前景:多参数 MRI、MRI-TRUS 融合影像引导活检和治疗方式的发展。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2020 Apr;25(4):509-520. doi: 10.1007/s10147-020-01627-8. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
9
Effect of Echo Times on Prostate Cancer Detection on T2-Weighted Images.回波时间对 T2 加权图像前列腺癌检测的影响。
Acad Radiol. 2020 Nov;27(11):1555-1563. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2019.12.014. Epub 2020 Jan 26.
10
Combining Prostate-Specific Antigen Parameters With Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Score Version 2.0 to Improve Its Diagnostic Accuracy.结合前列腺特异性抗原参数与前列腺影像报告和数据系统第2.0版评分以提高其诊断准确性。
World J Oncol. 2019 Dec;10(6):218-225. doi: 10.14740/wjon1230. Epub 2019 Dec 16.