• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颈动脉支架置入术和内膜切除术治疗心肌梗死:来自颈动脉血运重建内膜切除术与支架置入术试验的结果。

Myocardial infarction after carotid stenting and endarterectomy: results from the carotid revascularization endarterectomy versus stenting trial.

机构信息

Mayo Clinic, Griffin 3rd Floor, 4500 San Pablo Rd, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.

出版信息

Circulation. 2011 Jun 7;123(22):2571-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.008250. Epub 2011 May 23.

DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.008250
PMID:21606394
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3173718/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy Versus Stenting Trial (CREST) found a higher risk of stroke after carotid artery stenting and a higher risk of myocardial infarction (MI) after carotid endarterectomy.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Cardiac biomarkers and ECGs were performed before and 6 to 8 hours after either procedure and if there was clinical evidence of ischemia. In CREST, MI was defined as biomarker elevation plus either chest pain or ECG evidence of ischemia. An additional category of biomarker elevation with neither chest pain nor ECG abnormality was prespecified (biomarker+ only). Crude mortality and risk-adjusted mortality for MI and biomarker+ only were assessed during follow-up. Among 2502 patients, 14 MIs occurred in carotid artery stenting and 28 MIs in carotid endarterectomy (hazard ratio, 0.50; 95% confidence interval, 0.26 to 0.94; P=0.032) with a median biomarker ratio of 40 times the upper limit of normal. An additional 8 carotid artery stenting and 12 carotid endarterectomy patients had biomarker+ only (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% confidence interval, 0.27 to 1.61; P=0.36), and their median biomarker ratio was 14 times the upper limit of normal. Compared with patients without biomarker elevation, mortality was higher over 4 years for those with MI (hazard ratio, 3.40; 95% confidence interval, 1.67 to 6.92) or biomarker+ only (hazard ratio, 3.57; 95% confidence interval, 1.46 to 8.68). After adjustment for baseline risk factors, both MI and biomarker+ only remained independently associated with increased mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients randomized to carotid endarterectomy versus carotid artery stenting, both MI and biomarker+ only were more common with carotid endarterectomy. Although the levels of biomarker elevation were modest, both events were independently associated with increased future mortality and remain an important consideration in choosing the mode of carotid revascularization or medical therapy.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL: http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00004732.

摘要

背景

颈动脉血管重建内膜切除术与支架置入术试验(CREST)发现颈动脉支架置入术后中风风险较高,颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)后心肌梗死(MI)风险较高。

方法和结果

在两种手术前 6 至 8 小时以及存在缺血临床证据时进行心脏生物标志物和心电图检查。在 CREST 中,MI 的定义是生物标志物升高,同时出现胸痛或心电图缺血证据。还预设了另一个生物标志物升高而无胸痛或心电图异常的类别(仅生物标志物升高)。在随访期间评估了 MI 和仅生物标志物升高的粗死亡率和风险调整死亡率。在 2502 例患者中,14 例颈动脉支架置入术发生 MI,28 例颈动脉内膜切除术发生 MI(风险比,0.50;95%置信区间,0.26 至 0.94;P=0.032),中位生物标志物比值为正常上限的 40 倍。另外有 8 例颈动脉支架置入术和 12 例颈动脉内膜切除术患者仅生物标志物升高(风险比,0.66;95%置信区间,0.27 至 1.61;P=0.36),其中位生物标志物比值为正常上限的 14 倍。与无生物标志物升高的患者相比,4 年内发生 MI(风险比,3.40;95%置信区间,1.67 至 6.92)或仅生物标志物升高(风险比,3.57;95%置信区间,1.46 至 8.68)的患者死亡率更高。在校正基线风险因素后,MI 和仅生物标志物升高仍然与死亡率增加独立相关。

结论

在随机分配至颈动脉内膜切除术与颈动脉支架置入术的患者中,颈动脉内膜切除术更常见 MI 和仅生物标志物升高。尽管生物标志物升高水平适中,但两种事件均与未来死亡率增加独立相关,在选择颈动脉血运重建或药物治疗方式时仍然是一个重要考虑因素。

临床试验注册

网址:http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov。唯一标识符:NCT00004732。

相似文献

1
Myocardial infarction after carotid stenting and endarterectomy: results from the carotid revascularization endarterectomy versus stenting trial.颈动脉支架置入术和内膜切除术治疗心肌梗死:来自颈动脉血运重建内膜切除术与支架置入术试验的结果。
Circulation. 2011 Jun 7;123(22):2571-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.008250. Epub 2011 May 23.
2
Anesthetic type and risk of myocardial infarction after carotid endarterectomy in the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST).颈动脉血运重建内膜切除术与支架置入术试验(CREST)中颈动脉内膜切除术后的麻醉类型与心肌梗死风险
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Jul;64(1):3-8.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.01.047. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
3
Periprocedural Stroke and Myocardial Infarction as Risks for Long-Term Mortality in CREST.围手术期卒中与心肌梗死作为CREST研究中长期死亡率的风险因素
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018 Nov;11(11):e004663. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.004663.
4
Age and outcomes after carotid stenting and endarterectomy: the carotid revascularization endarterectomy versus stenting trial.颈动脉支架置入术与内膜切除术的年龄与结局:颈动脉血运重建内膜切除术与支架置入术试验。
Stroke. 2011 Dec;42(12):3484-90. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.624155. Epub 2011 Oct 6.
5
The Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST): stenting versus carotid endarterectomy for carotid disease.颈动脉血运重建内膜切除术与支架置入术试验(CREST):颈动脉疾病的支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术比较。
Stroke. 2010 Oct;41(10 Suppl):S31-4. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.595330.
6
Differential outcomes of carotid stenting and endarterectomy performed exclusively by vascular surgeons in the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST).颈动脉内膜切除术与血管外科医生实施的颈动脉支架置入术的疗效差异:颈动脉血运重建内膜切除术与支架置入术试验(CREST)。
J Vasc Surg. 2013 Feb;57(2):303-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.09.014. Epub 2012 Dec 20.
7
Influence of sex on outcomes of stenting versus endarterectomy: a subgroup analysis of the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST).性别对支架置入与内膜切除术治疗效果的影响:Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial(CREST)的亚组分析。
Lancet Neurol. 2011 Jun;10(6):530-7. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70080-1. Epub 2011 May 5.
8
Time From Symptoms to Carotid Endarterectomy or Stenting and Perioperative Risk.从出现症状到进行颈动脉内膜切除术或支架置入术的时间及围手术期风险。
Stroke. 2015 Dec;46(12):3540-2. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.011123. Epub 2015 Oct 22.
9
Complication rates and center enrollment volume in the carotid revascularization endarterectomy versus stenting trial.颈动脉血管重建术内膜切除术与支架置入术试验中的并发症发生率及中心入组数量
Stroke. 2014 Nov;45(11):3320-4. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.006228. Epub 2014 Sep 25.
10
Temporal Changes in Periprocedural Events in the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy Versus Stenting Trial.颈动脉血运重建内膜切除术与支架置入术试验中围手术期事件的时间变化
Stroke. 2015 Aug;46(8):2183-9. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.008898. Epub 2015 Jul 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Manual Sustained Inflation vs Stepwise PEEP on Pulmonary and Cerebral Outcomes in Carotid Endarterectomy Patients.颈动脉内膜切除术患者中手动持续膨胀与逐步 PEEP 对肺和脑结局的影响。
Med Sci Monit. 2024 Oct 8;30:e944936. doi: 10.12659/MSM.944936.
2
Cost-effectiveness of carotid artery stenting vs endarterectomy: A simulation.颈动脉支架置入术与动脉内膜切除术的成本效益:一项模拟研究。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2023 Feb;32(2):106908. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2022.106908. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
3
Carotid artery stenting prior to coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with carotid stenosis: Clinical outcomes.

本文引用的文献

1
Association of myocardial enzyme elevation and survival following coronary artery bypass graft surgery.心肌酶升高与冠状动脉旁路移植术后生存的关系。
JAMA. 2011 Feb 9;305(6):585-91. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.99.
2
Carotid-artery stenting in stroke prevention.颈动脉支架置入术预防卒中
N Engl J Med. 2010 Jul 1;363(1):80-2. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1005220. Epub 2010 May 26.
3
Stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis.颈动脉狭窄的血管内支架成形术与颈动脉内膜切除术治疗的比较。
颈动脉支架置入术在颈动脉狭窄患者冠状动脉旁路移植术前的应用:临床结果。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2023 Feb;29(1):30-36. doi: 10.1177/15910199221067665. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
4
Lessons From ACST-2.ACST-2 研究的启示。
Stroke. 2022 Apr;53(4):e145-e149. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.037269. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
5
Treatment of carotid stenosis in asymptomatic, nonoctogenarian, standard risk patients with stenting versus endarterectomy trials.无症状、非 80 岁以上、标准风险的颈动脉狭窄患者支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术治疗的临床试验。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Apr;75(4):1276-1283.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.10.020. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
6
Risk Factors of Cerebral Infarction and Myocardial Infarction after Carotid Endarterectomy Analyzed by Machine Learning.机器学习分析颈动脉内膜切除术后脑梗死和心肌梗死的危险因素。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2020 Nov 12;2020:6217392. doi: 10.1155/2020/6217392. eCollection 2020.
7
Transcarotid Artery Revascularization Results in Low Rates of Periprocedural Neurologic Events, Myocardial Infarction, and Death.经颈动脉血管重建术可降低围手术期神经事件、心肌梗死和死亡的发生率。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2020 Jan 15;22(1):3. doi: 10.1007/s11886-020-1256-z.
8
The SAPPHIRE criteria, history of myocardial infarction and diabetes predict adverse outcomes following carotid endarterectomy similar to stenting.SAPPHIRE 标准、心肌梗死病史和糖尿病与支架置入术类似,可预测颈动脉内膜切除术的不良结局。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2020 May;109(5):589-598. doi: 10.1007/s00392-019-01546-3. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
9
Comparison of Long Term Prognosis between Carotid Endarterectomy versus Stenting; A Korean Population-Based Study Using National Insurance Data.颈动脉内膜切除术与支架置入术的长期预后比较;一项基于韩国人群的利用国民保险数据的研究。
Neurointervention. 2019 Sep;14(2):82-90. doi: 10.5469/neuroint.2019.00115. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
10
Subclinical left ventricular dysfunction assessed by two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography in asymptomatic patients with carotid stenosis.二维斑点追踪超声心动图评估无症状颈动脉狭窄患者的亚临床左心室功能障碍。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Dec;35(12):2205-2212. doi: 10.1007/s10554-019-01677-8. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
N Engl J Med. 2010 Jul 1;363(1):11-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0912321. Epub 2010 May 26.
4
Carotid artery stenting compared with endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis (International Carotid Stenting Study): an interim analysis of a randomised controlled trial.症状性颈动脉狭窄患者颈动脉支架置入术与内膜切除术的比较(国际颈动脉支架研究):一项随机对照试验的中期分析。
Lancet. 2010 Mar 20;375(9719):985-97. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60239-5. Epub 2010 Feb 25.
5
The Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial: credentialing of interventionalists and final results of lead-in phase.颈动脉血运重建内膜切除术与支架置入术试验:介入专家资质认证及导入期的最终结果。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2010 Mar;19(2):153-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2010.01.001.
6
Short term and intermediate term comparison of endarterectomy versus stenting for carotid artery stenosis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled clinical trials.颈动脉狭窄内膜切除术与支架置入术的短期和中期比较:随机对照临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2010 Feb 12;340:c467. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c467.
7
Design of the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy vs. Stenting Trial (CREST).颈动脉血运重建内膜切除术与支架置入术试验(CREST)的设计。
Int J Stroke. 2010 Feb;5(1):40-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2009.00405.x.
8
Carotid artery stenting: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials.颈动脉支架置入术:随机临床试验的系统评价
Vasa. 2009 Nov;38(4):281-91. doi: 10.1024/0301-1526.38.4.281.
9
Relation of cardiac troponin I measurements at 24 and 48 hours to magnetic resonance-determined infarct size in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction.24 小时和 48 小时时肌钙蛋白 I 测量值与 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者磁共振确定的梗死面积的关系。
Am J Cardiol. 2009 Dec 1;104(11):1472-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.07.019. Epub 2009 Oct 14.
10
Usefulness of peak troponin-T to predict infarct size and long-term outcome in patients with first acute myocardial infarction after primary percutaneous coronary intervention.首次急性心肌梗死后接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者中,肌钙蛋白T峰值预测梗死面积及长期预后的价值。
Am J Cardiol. 2009 Mar 15;103(6):779-84. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.11.031. Epub 2009 Jan 24.