• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颈动脉血运重建内膜切除术与支架置入术试验:介入专家资质认证及导入期的最终结果。

The Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial: credentialing of interventionalists and final results of lead-in phase.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Millard Fillmore Hospital, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, USA.

出版信息

J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2010 Mar;19(2):153-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2010.01.001.

DOI:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2010.01.001
PMID:20189092
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2933081/
Abstract

The success of carotid artery stenting in preventing stroke requires a low risk of periprocedural stroke and death. A comprehensive training and credentialing process was prerequisite to the randomized Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST) to assemble a competent team of interventionalists with low periprocedural event rates. Interventionalists submitted cases to a multidisciplinary Interventional Management Committee. This committee evaluated 427 applicants. Of these, 238 (56%) were selected to participate in the training program and the lead-in phase, 73 (17%) who had clinical registry experience and satisfactory results with the devices used in CREST were exempt from training and were approved for the randomized phase, and 116 (27%) did not qualify for training. At 30 days in the lead-in study, stroke, myocardial infarction, or death occurred in 6.1% of symptomatic subjects and 4.8% of asymptomatic subjects. Stroke or death occurred in 5.8% of symptomatic subjects and 3.8% of asymptomatic subjects. Outcomes were better for younger subjects and varied by operator training. Based on experience, training, and lead-in results, the Interventional Management Committee selected 224 interventionalists to participate in the randomized phase of CREST. We believe that the credentialing and training of interventionalists participating in CREST have been the most rigorous reported to date for any randomized trial evaluating endovascular treatments. The study identified competent operators, which ensured that the randomized trial results fairly contrasted outcomes between endarterectomy and stenting.

摘要

颈动脉支架置入术预防中风的成功需要围手术期中风和死亡的风险低。全面的培训和认证过程是随机颈动脉血管重建内膜切除术与支架置入术试验(CREST)的先决条件,旨在组建一支具有低围手术期事件率的有能力的介入专家团队。介入专家向多学科介入管理委员会提交病例。该委员会评估了 427 名申请者。其中,238 名(56%)被选中参加培训计划和先导阶段,73 名(17%)有临床注册经验,并对 CREST 中使用的器械取得了满意的结果,免于培训,并被批准参加随机阶段,116 名(27%)不符合培训条件。在先导研究的 30 天内,症状性患者中有 6.1%和无症状患者中有 4.8%发生中风、心肌梗死或死亡。症状性患者中有 5.8%和无症状患者中有 3.8%发生中风或死亡。结果对于年轻患者更好,且因操作者的培训而异。根据经验、培训和先导结果,介入管理委员会选择了 224 名介入专家参加 CREST 的随机阶段。我们认为,参与 CREST 的介入专家的认证和培训是迄今为止任何评估血管内治疗的随机试验中最严格的。该研究确定了有能力的操作者,这确保了随机试验结果公平地对比了内膜切除术和支架置入术的结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54b6/2933081/0bcdea6f8f36/nihms169928f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54b6/2933081/d49eb0a68118/nihms169928f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54b6/2933081/90cacbe8aab5/nihms169928f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54b6/2933081/90d2177dae86/nihms169928f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54b6/2933081/0bcdea6f8f36/nihms169928f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54b6/2933081/d49eb0a68118/nihms169928f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54b6/2933081/90cacbe8aab5/nihms169928f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54b6/2933081/90d2177dae86/nihms169928f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54b6/2933081/0bcdea6f8f36/nihms169928f4.jpg

相似文献

1
The Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial: credentialing of interventionalists and final results of lead-in phase.颈动脉血运重建内膜切除术与支架置入术试验:介入专家资质认证及导入期的最终结果。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2010 Mar;19(2):153-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2010.01.001.
2
Credentialing of surgeons as interventionalists for carotid artery stenting: experience from the lead-in phase of CREST.外科医生作为颈动脉支架置入介入专家的资质认定:来自CREST导入阶段的经验
J Vasc Surg. 2004 Nov;40(5):952-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2004.08.039.
3
The Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy vs. Stenting Trial completes randomization: lessons learned and anticipated results.颈动脉血运重建内膜切除术与支架置入术试验完成随机分组:经验教训及预期结果
J Vasc Surg. 2009 Nov;50(5):1224-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.09.003.
4
Differential outcomes of carotid stenting and endarterectomy performed exclusively by vascular surgeons in the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST).颈动脉内膜切除术与血管外科医生实施的颈动脉支架置入术的疗效差异:颈动脉血运重建内膜切除术与支架置入术试验(CREST)。
J Vasc Surg. 2013 Feb;57(2):303-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.09.014. Epub 2012 Dec 20.
5
Complication rates and center enrollment volume in the carotid revascularization endarterectomy versus stenting trial.颈动脉血管重建术内膜切除术与支架置入术试验中的并发症发生率及中心入组数量
Stroke. 2014 Nov;45(11):3320-4. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.006228. Epub 2014 Sep 25.
6
International carotid stenting study: protocol for a randomised clinical trial comparing carotid stenting with endarterectomy in symptomatic carotid artery stenosis.国际颈动脉支架置入术研究:一项比较有症状颈动脉狭窄患者颈动脉支架置入术与动脉内膜切除术的随机临床试验方案。
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2004;18(1):69-74. doi: 10.1159/000078753. Epub 2004 Jun 1.
7
Factors influencing credentialing of interventionists in the CREST-2 trial.影响 CREST-2 试验介入治疗师认证的因素。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Mar;71(3):854-861. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.05.035. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
8
Immediate and remote results of using carotid endarterectomy and stenting of internal carotid arteries.颈动脉内膜切除术和颈内动脉支架置入术的近期和远期效果。
Angiol Sosud Khir. 2013;19(2):102-10, 93-100.
9
Influence of multiple stents on periprocedural stroke after carotid artery stenting in the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stent Trial (CREST).颈动脉内膜切除术与支架置入术治疗颈动脉狭窄试验(CREST)中,颈动脉支架置入术后多发性支架对围手术期卒中的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Mar;69(3):800-806. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.06.221. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
10
Does sex matter? Thirty-day stroke and death rates after carotid artery stenting in women versus men: results from the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST) lead-in phase.性别有影响吗?女性与男性颈动脉支架置入术后30天的中风和死亡率:来自颈动脉血运重建内膜切除术与支架置入试验(CREST)导入期的结果。
Stroke. 2009 Apr;40(4):1140-7. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.541847. Epub 2009 Feb 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Intraprocedural and Delayed Plaque Protrusion in Carotid Artery Stenting Using a Dual-Layer Metallic Stent.使用双层金属支架进行颈动脉支架置入术中及术后延迟性斑块突出
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2024 Oct 29;3(11):102285. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2024.102285. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
Current Status of Carotid Artery Stenting.颈动脉支架置入术的现状
Interv Radiol (Higashimatsuyama). 2023 Feb 9;9(3):122-126. doi: 10.22575/interventionalradiology.2022-0020. eCollection 2024 Nov 1.
3
Socioeconomic status as a predictor of post-operative mortality and outcomes in carotid artery stenting vs. carotid endarterectomy.

本文引用的文献

1
Does sex matter? Thirty-day stroke and death rates after carotid artery stenting in women versus men: results from the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST) lead-in phase.性别有影响吗?女性与男性颈动脉支架置入术后30天的中风和死亡率:来自颈动脉血运重建内膜切除术与支架置入试验(CREST)导入期的结果。
Stroke. 2009 Apr;40(4):1140-7. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.541847. Epub 2009 Feb 10.
2
Differences in complication rates among the centres in the SPACE study.SPACE研究中各中心并发症发生率的差异。
Neuroradiology. 2008 Dec;50(12):1049-53. doi: 10.1007/s00234-008-0459-6. Epub 2008 Sep 23.
3
社会经济地位作为颈动脉支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术术后死亡率及预后的预测因素
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Feb 7;11:1286100. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1286100. eCollection 2024.
4
Six-year outcomes of carotid artery stenting performed with multidisciplinary management in a single center.单中心多学科管理下颈动脉支架置入术的 6 年结果。
Anatol J Cardiol. 2021 Jun;25(6):385-394. doi: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2020.20420.
5
Improving Quality of Carotid Interventions: Identifying Hospital-Level Structural Factors that can Improve Outcomes.提高颈动脉介入治疗质量:确定能够改善治疗效果的医院层面结构因素。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2021 Apr;72:589-600. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.09.066. Epub 2020 Nov 21.
6
Staged angioplasty versus regular carotid artery stenting in patients with carotid artery stenosis at high risk of hyperperfusion: a randomised clinical trial.高灌注风险颈动脉狭窄患者的分期血管成形术与常规颈动脉支架置入术比较:一项随机临床试验。
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2021 Mar;6(1):95-102. doi: 10.1136/svn-2020-000391. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
7
Long-term Outcomes of Carotid Artery Stenting: A Single-center Experience.颈动脉支架置入术的长期疗效:单中心经验。
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2020 Mar 15;60(3):121-125. doi: 10.2176/nmc.oa.2019-0192. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
8
Quality Assurance for Carotid Stenting in the CREST-2 Registry.颈动脉支架置入术的质量保证:CREST-2 注册研究
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Dec 24;74(25):3071-3079. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.10.032.
9
Factors influencing credentialing of interventionists in the CREST-2 trial.影响 CREST-2 试验介入治疗师认证的因素。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Mar;71(3):854-861. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.05.035. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
10
Comorbidities and Health-Related Quality of Life Following Revascularization for Asymptomatic Critical Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis Treated with Carotid Endarterectomy or Angioplasty with Stenting.无症状性重度颈内动脉狭窄患者行颈动脉内膜切除术或血管成形术加支架置入后伴发疾病及健康相关生活质量。
Med Sci Monit. 2019 Jun 26;25:4734-4743. doi: 10.12659/MSM.916407.
Carotid angioplasty and stenting in octogenarians: is it safe?
八旬老人的颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术:安全吗?
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Sep 1;72(3):309-317. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21574.
4
Carotid artery stenting in elderly patients: importance of case selection.老年患者的颈动脉支架置入术:病例选择的重要性。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Sep 1;72(3):318-324. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21620.
5
Carotid artery stent placement is safe in the very elderly (> or =80 years).在高龄(≥80岁)患者中,颈动脉支架置入术是安全的。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Sep 1;72(3):303-308. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21635.
6
Treatment of asymptomatic carotid disease with stenting: pro.无症状性颈动脉疾病的支架置入治疗:赞成方。
Semin Vasc Surg. 2008 Jun;21(2):95-9. doi: 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2008.03.005.
7
Clinical and angiographic risk factors for stroke and death within 30 days after carotid endarterectomy and stent-protected angioplasty: a subanalysis of the SPACE study.颈动脉内膜切除术和支架置入血管成形术后30天内发生卒中及死亡的临床和血管造影危险因素:SPACE研究的亚组分析
Lancet Neurol. 2008 Mar;7(3):216-22. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70024-3. Epub 2008 Jan 31.
8
The CAPTURE registry: predictors of outcomes in carotid artery stenting with embolic protection for high surgical risk patients in the early post-approval setting.CAPTURE注册研究:早期批准后使用栓子保护装置对高手术风险患者进行颈动脉支架置入术的预后预测因素。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007 Dec 1;70(7):1025-33. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21359.
9
The CAPTURE registry: results of carotid stenting with embolic protection in the post approval setting.CAPTURE注册研究:批准后应用栓子保护装置行颈动脉支架置入术的结果
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007 Feb 15;69(3):341-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21050.
10
Endarterectomy versus stenting in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis.有症状的重度颈动脉狭窄患者行内膜切除术与支架置入术的比较
N Engl J Med. 2006 Oct 19;355(16):1660-71. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa061752.