• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

1967 年至 1976 年间出生的所有 611654 名挪威人在 16-20 岁死于道路交通的社会不平等:多层次分析。

Social inequalities in road traffic deaths at age 16-20 years among all 611,654 Norwegians born between 1967 and 1976: a multilevel analysis.

机构信息

Department of Community Medicine, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Inj Prev. 2012 Feb;18(1):3-9. doi: 10.1136/ip.2011.031682. Epub 2011 May 23.

DOI:10.1136/ip.2011.031682
PMID:21606470
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3262988/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Road traffic injury is a major cause of death among youths.

AIMS

To estimate mortality differences in family socioeconomic position (SEP) and municipal disadvantage level.

METHODS

Data on all Norwegians born in 1967-76, gathered from national registries, were linked by a unique national identification number. The 611 654 participants were followed-up for 5 years from age 16 years. Parental education level, father's income level, and proportion of high-income earners in the municipality served as SEP indicators. Associations between SEP and road traffic deaths were analysed by multilevel Poisson regression. Results Road traffic deaths (n=676, rate 22.2 per 100 000 person-years) constituted a major cause of death, of which 91.9% were motor vehicle occupants. SEP distributions differed according to gender and type of motor vehicle crash (collision, non-collision). There was an inverse relationship between municipal proportions of high-income earners and mortality (population attributable fraction (PAF) 0.43, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.53) in all categories of gender-specific crash types. Family SEP gradients were not found except for male non-collision deaths, where increasing mortality was found in association with decreasing parental education level (PAF 0.94, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.99) and increasing paternal income (PAF 0.25, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.40).

CONCLUSION

The different SEP patterns for road traffic deaths across gender and motor vehicle crash type illustrate that heterogeneity of social inequalities in health can be found even within narrow age bands and for similar causes of death.

摘要

背景

道路交通伤害是年轻人死亡的主要原因之一。

目的

估计家庭社会经济地位(SEP)和城市不利程度的死亡率差异。

方法

通过唯一的国家身份识别号码,将所有出生于 1967-76 年的挪威人的数据从国家登记册中收集起来。611654 名参与者从 16 岁开始随访 5 年。父母的教育水平、父亲的收入水平以及城市中高收入者的比例作为 SEP 指标。通过多层次泊松回归分析 SEP 与道路交通死亡之间的关系。结果道路交通死亡(n=676,死亡率为 22.2/10 万人年)是主要死因,其中 91.9%是机动车乘员。SE 分布因性别和机动车碰撞类型(碰撞、非碰撞)而异。在所有性别特定碰撞类型中,城市高收入者比例与死亡率呈负相关(人群归因分数(PAF)为 0.43,95%CI 为 0.30-0.53)。除了男性非碰撞死亡外,未发现家庭 SEP 梯度,在这种情况下,死亡率随着父母教育水平的降低(PAF 为 0.94,95%CI 为 0.59-0.99)和父亲收入的增加(PAF 为 0.25,95%CI 为 0.06-0.40)而增加。

结论

道路交通死亡在性别和机动车碰撞类型方面的不同 SEP 模式表明,即使在狭窄的年龄组内,甚至在类似的死亡原因中,健康方面的社会不平等也存在异质性。

相似文献

1
Social inequalities in road traffic deaths at age 16-20 years among all 611,654 Norwegians born between 1967 and 1976: a multilevel analysis.1967 年至 1976 年间出生的所有 611654 名挪威人在 16-20 岁死于道路交通的社会不平等:多层次分析。
Inj Prev. 2012 Feb;18(1):3-9. doi: 10.1136/ip.2011.031682. Epub 2011 May 23.
2
Road Traffic Accidents and Disparities in Child Mortality.道路交通事故与儿童死亡率差异。
Pediatrics. 2020 Nov;146(5). doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-3009. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
3
Individual and areal risk factors for road traffic injury deaths: nationwide study in South Korea.个体和区域道路交通伤害死亡风险因素:韩国全国性研究。
Asia Pac J Public Health. 2010 Jul;22(3):320-31. doi: 10.1177/1010539510361514.
4
Childhood socioeconomic position and cause-specific mortality in early adulthood.儿童期社会经济地位与成年早期特定病因死亡率
Am J Epidemiol. 2007 Jan 1;165(1):85-93. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwj352. Epub 2006 Oct 13.
5
Road traffic injury mortality and morbidity by country development status, 2011-2017.2011-2017 年按国家发展状况划分的道路交通伤害死亡率和发病率。
Chin J Traumatol. 2021 Mar;24(2):88-93. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2021.01.007. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
6
Road traffic mortality in China: analysis of national surveillance data from 2006 to 2016.中国道路交通死亡率:2006 年至 2016 年国家监测数据分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2019 May;4(5):e245-e255. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(19)30057-X.
7
Socioeconomic aspects of the circumstances and consequences of car crashes among young adults.年轻成年人车祸情况及后果的社会经济方面
Soc Sci Med. 2005 Jan;60(2):287-95. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.05.006.
8
Estimating the drink driving attributable fraction of road traffic deaths in Mexico.估算墨西哥道路交通死亡事件中与酒后驾车相关的比例。
Addiction. 2018 May;113(5):828-835. doi: 10.1111/add.14153. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
9
Effects of long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution on respiratory and cardiovascular mortality in the Netherlands: the NLCS-AIR study.长期暴露于交通相关空气污染对荷兰呼吸道和心血管疾病死亡率的影响:荷兰长期队列空气污染研究(NLCS-AIR研究)
Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2009 Mar(139):5-71; discussion 73-89.
10
Epidemiologic study of traffic crash mortality among motorcycle users in Iran (2011-2017).伊朗摩托车使用者交通事故死亡率的流行病学研究(2011 - 2017年)
Chin J Traumatol. 2020 Aug;23(4):219-223. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2020.05.008. Epub 2020 May 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Trends in traffic accident mortality and social inequalities in Ecuador from 2011 to 2022.厄瓜多尔 2011 年至 2022 年交通事故死亡率趋势及社会不平等状况
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jul 21;24(1):1951. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19494-7.
2
Inequalities in Violent Death across Income Levels among Young Males and Females in Countries of the Americas.美洲国家中不同收入水平的年轻男性和女性在暴力死亡方面的不平等。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 24;20(7):5256. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20075256.
3
A retrospective cohort study on the aetiology and characteristics of maxillofacial fractures presenting to a tertiary centre in the UK.

本文引用的文献

1
Socioeconomic status and risk of car crash injury, independent of place of residence and driving exposure: results from the DRIVE Study.社会经济地位与车祸受伤风险的关系,独立于居住地和驾驶暴露:DRIVE 研究结果。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2010 Nov;64(11):998-1003. doi: 10.1136/jech.2009.091496. Epub 2009 Oct 12.
2
Suicide in young Norwegians in a life course perspective: population-based cohort study.从人生历程角度看挪威年轻人的自杀问题:基于人群的队列研究。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2010 May;64(5):407-12. doi: 10.1136/jech.2008.083485. Epub 2009 Aug 13.
3
How do car crashes happen among young drivers aged 18-20 years? Typical circumstances in relation to license status, alcohol impairment and injury consequences.
一项关于英国一家三级医疗中心收治的颌面骨折病因及特征的回顾性队列研究。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022 Apr 12;77:103622. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103622. eCollection 2022 May.
4
Injury Prevention and long-term Outcomes following Trauma-the IPOT project: a protocol for prospective nationwide registry-based studies in Norway.创伤后预防和长期结局-IPOT 项目:挪威全国基于注册的前瞻性研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 May 18;11(5):e046954. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046954.
5
Association of Social Determinants of Health and Road Traffic Deaths: A Systematic Review.健康的社会决定因素与道路交通死亡的关联:一项系统综述
Bull Emerg Trauma. 2020 Oct;8(4):211-217. doi: 10.30476/beat.2020.86574.
6
Socio-Demographic Determinants of Road Traffic Fatalities in Women of Reproductive Age in the Republic of Georgia: Evidence from the National Reproductive Age Mortality Study (2014).格鲁吉亚共和国育龄女性道路交通死亡的社会人口学决定因素:来自全国育龄期死亡率研究(2014年)的证据
Int J Womens Health. 2020 Jul 13;12:527-537. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S244437. eCollection 2020.
7
Analysis and identification of the hidden relationships between effective factors in the mortality rate caused by road accidents: A case study of Fars Province, Iran.道路交通事故死亡率相关影响因素间隐藏关系的分析与识别:以伊朗法尔斯省为例
Chin J Traumatol. 2019 Aug;22(4):233-239. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2018.11.004. Epub 2019 May 22.
8
Evaluating the impact of an injury prevention measure regarding different sociodemographic factors.评估一项伤害预防措施对不同社会人口学因素的影响。
J Inj Violence Res. 2018 Jan;10(1):25-33. doi: 10.5249/jivr.v10i1.952. Epub 2017 Dec 4.
9
Association between trauma and socioeconomic deprivation: a registry-based, Scotland-wide retrospective cohort study of 9,238 patients.创伤与社会经济贫困之间的关联:一项基于登记处的全苏格兰范围的回顾性队列研究,涉及9238名患者。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016 Jul 7;24:90. doi: 10.1186/s13049-016-0275-7.
10
Does transport time help explain the high trauma mortality rates in rural areas? New and traditional predictors assessed by new and traditional statistical methods.转运时间能否解释农村地区创伤死亡率居高不下的现象?采用新的和传统的统计方法评估新的和传统的预测因素。
Inj Prev. 2015 Dec;21(6):367-73. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2014-041473. Epub 2015 May 13.
18-20 岁年轻驾驶员发生车祸的原因是什么?与驾照状况、酒精摄入和伤害后果相关的典型情况。
Accid Anal Prev. 2009 Jul;41(4):734-8. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.03.012. Epub 2009 Apr 17.
4
Social determinants of child and adolescent traffic-related and intentional injuries: a multilevel study in Stockholm County.儿童和青少年交通相关及故意伤害的社会决定因素:斯德哥尔摩县的一项多层次研究
Soc Sci Med. 2009 May;68(10):1826-34. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.02.050. Epub 2009 Apr 6.
5
IQ in early adulthood, socioeconomic position, and unintentional injury mortality by middle age: a cohort study of more than 1 million Swedish men.成年早期的智商、社会经济地位与中年时的非故意伤害死亡率:一项针对100多万瑞典男性的队列研究。
Am J Epidemiol. 2009 Mar 1;169(5):606-15. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwn381. Epub 2009 Jan 15.
6
Next steps in understanding the multilevel determinants of health.了解健康的多层次决定因素的后续步骤。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2008 Nov;62(11):957-9. doi: 10.1136/jech.2007.064311.
7
The area-based social patterning of injuries among 10 to 19 year olds. Changes over time in the Stockholm County.10至19岁青少年伤害的区域社会模式。斯德哥尔摩县随时间的变化。
BMC Public Health. 2008 Apr 23;8:131. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-131.
8
Trends in young driver risk and countermeasures in European countries.欧洲国家年轻驾驶员风险趋势及应对措施
J Safety Res. 2007;38(2):245-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2007.03.006. Epub 2007 Apr 4.
9
Parent involvement in novice teen driving: rationale, evidence of effects, and potential for enhancing graduated driver licensing effectiveness.父母对青少年新手驾驶的参与:理论依据、效果证据以及增强分级驾驶员执照有效性的潜力。
J Safety Res. 2007;38(2):193-202. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2007.02.007. Epub 2007 Mar 26.
10
Reducing inequalities from injuries in Europe.减少欧洲地区伤害方面的不平等现象。
Lancet. 2006 Dec 23;368(9554):2243-50. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68895-8.