Suppr超能文献

在基于人群的慢性疾病研究中评估相对死亡率和超额死亡率,如终末期肾病。

Appraising relative and excess mortality in population-based studies of chronic diseases such as end-stage renal disease.

机构信息

Université Paris Descartes, Faculté de Médecine, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, Service de Biostatistique et d'Informatique Médicale, Paris, France;

出版信息

Clin Epidemiol. 2011;3:157-69. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S17349. Epub 2011 May 10.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Modeling excess and relative mortality represents two ways of considering general population mortality rates (ie, background mortality) in cohort studies. Excess mortality is obtained by subtracting the expected mortality from the observed mortality (additive hazard model). Relative mortality is obtained by dividing the observed mortality by the expected mortality (multiplicative hazard model). Our first objective was to compare the results of these two models in a population-based cohort including 5115 dialyzed patients older than 70 years (mean age 79 years, range 70-97 years). Our second objective was to explore an alternative model combining both excess and relative mortality.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Effects of covariates on excess mortality and relative mortality were assessed using a generalized linear model and a Cox model, respectively. The model, combining both excess and relative mortality, is derived from the Aalen model.

RESULTS

The effect of age and sex was different according to the additive or multiplicative model used, whereas the effect of the first modality of dialysis or the primary nephropathy was similar. Because there was no evidence of lack of fit, the choice of one of these two models was not obvious. The combined model showed that the two components, additive and multiplicative, had to be kept. In this case, the combined model led to results similar to the pure additive and multiplicative univariate models, except for the method of dialysis, which did not exert an effect on both excess and relative mortality.

CONCLUSION

We underlined the complementary interest of modeling excess and relative mortality in looking for factors associated with mortality related to end-stage renal disease. The combined model appeared attractive in offering the possibility of reducing the model to the most appropriate one. When both components have to be retained, it better describes the effect of covariates on excess and relative mortality.

摘要

目的

模型构建超额死亡率和相对死亡率是考虑队列研究中一般人群死亡率(即背景死亡率)的两种方法。超额死亡率是通过从观察死亡率中减去预期死亡率来获得的(加法风险模型)。相对死亡率是通过将观察死亡率除以预期死亡率来获得的(乘法风险模型)。我们的第一个目标是在一个基于人群的队列中比较这两种模型的结果,该队列包括 5115 名年龄大于 70 岁的透析患者(平均年龄 79 岁,范围 70-97 岁)。我们的第二个目标是探索一种结合超额死亡率和相对死亡率的替代模型。

患者和方法

使用广义线性模型和 Cox 模型分别评估协变量对超额死亡率和相对死亡率的影响。结合超额死亡率和相对死亡率的模型源自 Aalen 模型。

结果

年龄和性别对加法或乘法模型的影响不同,而透析的第一种方式或原发性肾病的影响相似。由于没有证据表明拟合不足,因此选择这两种模型之一并不明显。联合模型表明,两个组成部分,即加法和乘法,必须保留。在这种情况下,联合模型得出的结果与纯加法和乘法单变量模型相似,除了透析方法,它对超额死亡率和相对死亡率都没有影响。

结论

我们强调了在寻找与终末期肾病相关死亡率相关因素时,对超额死亡率和相对死亡率进行建模的互补性。联合模型在提供将模型简化为最合适模型的可能性方面具有吸引力。当两个组成部分都必须保留时,它可以更好地描述协变量对超额死亡率和相对死亡率的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bae8/3096516/d39acd293ce0/clep-3-157f1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验