• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Designing payment for Collaborative Care for Depression in primary care.设计初级保健中协作式抑郁症护理的支付方式。
Health Serv Res. 2011 Oct;46(5):1436-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01272.x. Epub 2011 May 24.
2
Collaborative treatment of late-life depression in primary care (GermanIMPACT): study protocol of a cluster-randomized controlled trial.初级保健中晚期抑郁症的联合治疗(GermanIMPACT):一项整群随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2014 Sep 6;15:351. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-351.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
The Costs and Cost-effectiveness of Collaborative Care for Adolescents With Depression in Primary Care Settings: A Randomized Clinical Trial.协作式护理治疗青少年抑郁症的成本和成本效益:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Pediatr. 2016 Nov 1;170(11):1048-1054. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.1721.
5
Long-term cost effects of collaborative care for late-life depression.老年抑郁症协作护理的长期成本效应
Am J Manag Care. 2008 Feb;14(2):95-100.
6
Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of collaborative care for depression in UK primary care (CADET): a cluster randomised controlled trial.英国初级保健中抑郁症协作护理的临床疗效和成本效益(CADET):一项整群随机对照试验
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Feb;20(14):1-192. doi: 10.3310/hta20140.
7
CollAborative care for Screen-Positive EldeRs with major depression (CASPER plus): a multicentred randomised controlled trial of clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness.伴有重度抑郁症的 Screen-Positive 老年人的协作式护理(CASPER plus):一项针对临床效果和成本效益的多中心随机对照试验。
Health Technol Assess. 2017 Nov;21(67):1-252. doi: 10.3310/hta21670.
8
A budget impact analysis of telemedicine-based collaborative care for depression.基于远程医疗的协作式抑郁症管理的预算影响分析。
Med Care. 2011 Sep;49(9):872-80. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31821d2b35.
9
Clinical effectiveness of collaborative care for depression in UK primary care (CADET): cluster randomised controlled trial.协作式护理在英国初级医疗保健中治疗抑郁症的临床效果(CADET):群组随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2013 Aug 19;347:f4913. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f4913.
10
Cost-effectiveness of a primary care depression intervention.基层医疗中抑郁症干预措施的成本效益
J Gen Intern Med. 2003 Jun;18(6):432-41. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20611.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Design of a Payment Decision-Support Tool for Coordinated Specialty Care for Early Psychosis.早期精神病协调专科护理支付决策支持工具的设计
Psychiatr Serv. 2021 Feb 1;72(2):180-185. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.202000129. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
2
Financing for Collaborative Care - A Narrative Review.协作式照护的融资——一篇叙述性综述
Curr Treat Options Psychiatry. 2018 Sep;5(3):334-344. doi: 10.1007/s40501-018-0150-4. Epub 2018 Jul 6.
3
Integrated Care for Depression in Older Primary Care Patients.老年初级保健患者抑郁的综合护理。
Can J Psychiatry. 2018 Jul;63(7):439-446. doi: 10.1177/0706743718760292. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
4
Value-based payment in implementing evidence-based care: the Mental Health Integration Program in Washington state.实施循证护理中的基于价值的支付:华盛顿州的心理健康整合项目。
Am J Manag Care. 2017 Jan;23(1):48-53.
5
Antidepressant Prescribing in Primary Care to Older Adults Without Major Depression.基层医疗中对无重度抑郁症的老年人开具抗抑郁药的情况。
Psychiatr Serv. 2017 May 1;68(5):449-455. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201600197. Epub 2017 Jan 3.
6
Enablers and barriers to implementing collaborative care for anxiety and depression: a systematic qualitative review.实施焦虑症和抑郁症协作护理的促进因素与障碍:一项系统性定性综述
Implement Sci. 2016 Dec 28;11(1):165. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0519-y.
7
Partnering with health system operations leadership to develop a controlled implementation trial.与医疗系统运营领导层合作开展一项对照实施试验。
Implement Sci. 2016 Feb 24;11:22. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0385-7.
8
Unpacking Collaborative Care for Depression: Examining Two Essential Tasks for Implementation.剖析抑郁症的协作式护理:审视实施的两项关键任务。
Psychiatr Serv. 2016 Apr 1;67(4):418-24. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201400577. Epub 2015 Nov 16.
9
Incentives and disincentives for the treatment of depression and anxiety: a scoping review.激励和抑制抑郁和焦虑治疗的因素:范围综述。
Can J Psychiatry. 2014 Jul;59(7):385-92. doi: 10.1177/070674371405900706.
10
VA health service utilization for homeless and low-income Veterans: a spotlight on the VA Supportive Housing (VASH) program in greater Los Angeles.VA 卫生服务在无家可归和低收入退伍军人中的利用:聚焦于大洛杉矶地区的 VA 保障性住房(VASH)计划。
Med Care. 2014 May;52(5):454-61. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000112.

本文引用的文献

1
Long-term cost effects of collaborative care for late-life depression.老年抑郁症协作护理的长期成本效应
Am J Manag Care. 2008 Feb;14(2):95-100.
2
Systematic review of multifaceted interventions to improve depression care.改善抑郁症护理的多方面干预措施的系统评价
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2007 Mar-Apr;29(2):91-116. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2006.12.003.
3
Collaborative care for depression: a cumulative meta-analysis and review of longer-term outcomes.抑郁症的协作护理:一项累积荟萃分析及长期结局综述
Arch Intern Med. 2006 Nov 27;166(21):2314-21. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.21.2314.
4
Funding mechanisms for depression care management: opportunities and challenges.抑郁症护理管理的资金机制:机遇与挑战。
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2006 Jul-Aug;28(4):278-88. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2006.03.006.
5
Transforming mental health care at the interface with general medicine: report for the presidents commission.在与普通医学的交叉领域转变精神卫生保健:给总统委员会的报告
Psychiatr Serv. 2006 Jan;57(1):37-47. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.57.1.37.
6
Cost-effectiveness of improving primary care treatment of late-life depression.改善老年抑郁症初级护理治疗的成本效益。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005 Dec;62(12):1313-20. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.62.12.1313.
7
Moving beyond round pegs and square holes: restructuring Medicare to improve chronic care.
Ann Intern Med. 2005 Sep 20;143(6):439-45. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-143-6-200509200-00008.
8
Disease management programs for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.抑郁症疾病管理项目:随机对照试验的系统评价与荟萃分析
Med Care. 2004 Dec;42(12):1211-21. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200412000-00008.
9
Confronting the barriers to chronic care management in Medicare.应对医疗保险中慢性病管理的障碍。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2003 Jan-Jun;Suppl Web Exclusives:W3-37-53. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.w3.37.
10
Implementing a disease management intervention for depression in primary care: a random work sampling study.在初级保健中实施抑郁症疾病管理干预措施:一项随机工作抽样研究。
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2003 Jul-Aug;25(4):238-45. doi: 10.1016/s0163-8343(03)00023-9.

设计初级保健中协作式抑郁症护理的支付方式。

Designing payment for Collaborative Care for Depression in primary care.

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Weill Cornell Medical College, 402 E 67th St., New York, NY 10065, USA.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2011 Oct;46(5):1436-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01272.x. Epub 2011 May 24.

DOI:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01272.x
PMID:21609327
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3168701/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To design a bundled case rate for Collaborative Care for Depression (CCD) that aligns incentives with evidence-based depression care in primary care.

DATA SOURCES

A clinical information system used by all care managers in a randomized controlled trial of CCD for older primary care patients.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted an empirical investigation of factors accounting for variation in CCD resource use over time and across patients. CCD resource use at the patient-episode and patient-month levels was measured by number of care manager contacts and direct patient contact time and analyzed with count data (Poisson or negative binomial) models.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Episode-level resource use varies substantially with patient's time in the program. Monthly use declines sharply in the first 6 months regardless of treatment response or remission status, but it remains stable afterwards. An adjusted episode or monthly case rate design better matches payment with variation in resource use compared with a fixed design.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings lend support to an episode payment adjusted by number of months receiving CCD and a monthly payment adjusted by the ordinal month. Nonpayment tools including program certification and performance evaluation and reward systems are needed to fully align incentives.

摘要

目的

设计协同护理治疗抑郁症(CCD)的捆绑病例付费方案,使激励机制与初级保健中的循证抑郁症护理相协调。

数据来源

在一项针对老年初级保健患者的 CCD 的随机对照试验中,所有护理经理使用的临床信息系统。

研究设计

我们对导致 CCD 资源使用随时间和患者变化的因素进行了实证调查。通过护理经理的接触次数和直接与患者接触的时间,以患者-发病次数和患者-月为单位来衡量 CCD 资源的使用情况,并使用计数数据(泊松或负二项式)模型进行分析。

主要发现

发病次数水平的资源使用随患者在项目中的时间而有很大差异。无论治疗反应或缓解状态如何,在最初的 6 个月内,每月的使用量都会急剧下降,但此后保持稳定。与固定设计相比,调整后的发病次数或每月病例付费设计更能使支付与资源使用的变化相匹配。

结论

我们的研究结果为按接受 CCD 的月数调整的发病次数付费和按序月数调整的每月付费提供了支持。需要非支付工具,包括项目认证和绩效评估以及奖励系统,以充分调整激励机制。