EMGO Institute, VU University Medical Center , Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
J Palliat Med. 2011 Jul;14(7):852-63. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2010.0356. Epub 2011 May 25.
Although spiritual caregiving is a key domain of palliative care, it lacks a clear definition, which impedes both caregiving and research in this domain. The aim of this study was to conceptualize spirituality by identifying dimensions, based on instruments measuring spirituality in end-of-life populations. A systematic literature review was conducted. Literature published between 1980 and 2009, focussing on instruments measuring spirituality at the end of life was collected from the PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and PsycINFO databases. Inclusion criteria were: (1) the studies provide empirical data collected with an instrument measuring spirituality or aspects of spirituality at the end of life; (2) the data report on a (subgroup) of an end-of-life population, and (3) the instrument is available in the public domain. Content validity was assessed according to a consensus-based method. From the items of the instruments, three investigators independently derived dimensions of spirituality at the end of life. In 36 articles that met the inclusion criteria we identified 24 instruments. Nine instruments with adequate content validity were used to identify dimensions of spirituality. To adequately represent the items of the instruments and to describe the relationships between the dimensions, a model defining spirituality was constructed. The model distinguishes the dimensions of Spiritual Well-being (e.g., peace), Spiritual Cognitive Behavioral Context (Spiritual Beliefs, Spiritual Activities, and Spiritual Relationships), and Spiritual Coping, and also indicates relationships between the dimensions. This model may help researchers to plan studies and to choose appropriate outcomes, and assist caregivers in planning spiritual care.
尽管精神关怀是姑息治疗的一个重要领域,但它缺乏明确的定义,这既妨碍了该领域的护理工作,也妨碍了该领域的研究。本研究的目的是通过确定在生命末期人群中测量灵性的工具来确定灵性的维度。进行了系统的文献回顾。从 PubMed、Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature(CINAHL)和 PsycINFO 数据库中收集了 1980 年至 2009 年间发表的、专注于生命末期测量灵性的工具的文献,这些文献都符合以下纳入标准:(1)研究提供了使用测量灵性或生命末期灵性方面的工具收集的实证数据;(2)数据报告了生命末期人群的一个(亚组);(3)该工具可在公共领域获得。根据共识方法评估内容效度。从工具的项目中,三位研究者独立得出生命末期灵性的维度。在符合纳入标准的 36 篇文章中,我们确定了 24 种工具。使用具有足够内容效度的 9 种工具来确定灵性的维度。为了充分代表工具的项目并描述维度之间的关系,构建了一个定义灵性的模型。该模型区分了精神幸福感(例如,平静)、精神认知行为背景(精神信仰、精神活动和精神关系)和精神应对的维度,并表明了维度之间的关系。该模型可以帮助研究人员规划研究并选择合适的结果,还可以帮助护理人员规划精神关怀。