• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

归纳推理中规则获取和规则遵循的机制。

Mechanisms of rule acquisition and rule following in inductive reasoning.

机构信息

Cognitive Neuroscience Sector, International School for Advanced Studies, 34136 Trieste, Italy.

出版信息

J Neurosci. 2011 May 25;31(21):7763-74. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4579-10.2011.

DOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4579-10.2011
PMID:21613489
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6633120/
Abstract

Despite the recent interest in the neuroanatomy of inductive reasoning processes, the regional specificity within prefrontal cortex (PFC) for the different mechanisms involved in induction tasks remains to be determined. In this study, we used fMRI to investigate the contribution of PFC regions to rule acquisition (rule search and rule discovery) and rule following. Twenty-six healthy young adult participants were presented with a series of images of cards, each consisting of a set of circles numbered in sequence with one colored blue. Participants had to predict the position of the blue circle on the next card. The rules that had to be acquired pertained to the relationship among succeeding stimuli. Responses given by subjects were categorized in a series of phases either tapping rule acquisition (responses given up to and including rule discovery) or rule following (correct responses after rule acquisition). Mid-dorsolateral PFC (mid-DLPFC) was active during rule search and remained active until successful rule acquisition. By contrast, rule following was associated with activation in temporal, motor, and medial/anterior prefrontal cortex. Moreover, frontopolar cortex (FPC) was active throughout the rule acquisition and rule following phases before a rule became familiar. We attributed activation in mid-DLPFC to hypothesis generation and in FPC to integration of multiple separate inferences. The present study provides evidence that brain activation during inductive reasoning involves a complex network of frontal processes and that different subregions respond during rule acquisition and rule following phases.

摘要

尽管最近人们对归纳推理过程的神经解剖学产生了兴趣,但前额叶皮层(PFC)中与归纳任务相关的不同机制的区域特异性仍有待确定。在这项研究中,我们使用 fMRI 来研究 PFC 区域对规则获取(规则搜索和规则发现)和规则遵循的贡献。26 名健康的年轻成年参与者被呈现一系列卡片图像,每张卡片上都有一组按顺序编号的圆圈,其中一个圆圈被涂成蓝色。参与者必须预测下一张卡片上蓝色圆圈的位置。必须获取的规则与后继刺激之间的关系有关。受试者的反应被分为一系列阶段,要么是在规则获取期间(规则发现之前和包括规则发现的反应),要么是在规则遵循期间(规则获取后的正确反应)。背外侧前额叶皮层(mid-DLPFC)在规则搜索期间活跃,并在成功获取规则后仍然活跃。相比之下,规则遵循与颞叶、运动和内侧/前前额叶皮层的激活有关。此外,额极皮层(FPC)在规则获取和规则遵循阶段之前一直活跃,直到规则变得熟悉。我们将 mid-DLPFC 的激活归因于假设生成,将 FPC 的激活归因于多个单独推断的整合。本研究提供的证据表明,归纳推理过程中的大脑激活涉及到一个复杂的额叶过程网络,并且不同的子区域在规则获取和规则遵循阶段都会做出反应。

相似文献

1
Mechanisms of rule acquisition and rule following in inductive reasoning.归纳推理中规则获取和规则遵循的机制。
J Neurosci. 2011 May 25;31(21):7763-74. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4579-10.2011.
2
Different strategies in solving series completion inductive reasoning problems: an fMRI and computational study.解决数列完成归纳推理问题的不同策略:一项功能磁共振成像和计算研究。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2014 Aug;93(2):253-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2014.05.006. Epub 2014 May 16.
3
Disentangling the prefrontal network for rule selection by means of a non-verbal variant of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test.通过威斯康星卡片分类测试的非语言变体来解析前额叶网络进行规则选择的机制。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2009 May;30(5):1734-43. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20637.
4
Prefrontal and parietal activity is modulated by the rule complexity of inductive reasoning and can be predicted by a cognitive model.前额叶和顶叶的活动受归纳推理规则复杂性的调节,并且可以通过一个认知模型进行预测。
Neuropsychologia. 2015 Jan;66:67-74. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.10.015. Epub 2014 Oct 22.
5
Dissociable roles of medial and lateral PFC in rule learning.内侧和外侧前额叶皮质在规则学习中的不同作用。
Brain Behav. 2016 Aug 19;6(11):e00551. doi: 10.1002/brb3.551. eCollection 2016 Nov.
6
Separable neural mechanisms contribute to feedback processing in a rule-learning task.可分离的神经机制有助于规则学习任务中的反馈处理。
Neuropsychologia. 2008 Jan 15;46(1):117-26. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.08.009. Epub 2007 Aug 22.
7
Common and dissociable neural correlates associated with component processes of inductive reasoning.与归纳推理的组成过程相关的常见和可分离的神经关联。
Neuroimage. 2011 Jun 15;56(4):2292-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.03.020. Epub 2011 Mar 22.
8
Frontal networks for learning and executing arbitrary stimulus-response associations.用于学习和执行任意刺激-反应关联的额叶网络。
J Neurosci. 2005 Mar 9;25(10):2723-32. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3697-04.2005.
9
The role of frontopolar cortex in subgoal processing during working memory.额极皮质在工作记忆中次级目标加工中的作用。
Neuroimage. 2002 Mar;15(3):523-36. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2001.1019.
10
The interaction of process and domain in prefrontal cortex during inductive reasoning.归纳推理过程中前额叶皮层内过程与领域的相互作用。
Neuropsychologia. 2015 Jan;67:91-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.12.010. Epub 2014 Dec 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Partially dissociative role of the left inferior frontal gyrus and left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in reasoning.左侧额下回和左侧背外侧前额叶皮质在推理中的部分解离作用。
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 2;19(12):e0312919. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312919. eCollection 2024.
2
Abnormalities of cerebral blood flow and the regional brain function in Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and multimodal neuroimaging meta-analysis.帕金森病中脑血流和局部脑功能异常:系统评价与多模态神经影像学荟萃分析
Front Neurol. 2023 Dec 7;14:1289934. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1289934. eCollection 2023.
3
Neural activity and network analysis for understanding reasoning using the matrix reasoning task.使用矩阵推理任务理解推理的神经活动和网络分析。
Cogn Process. 2023 Nov;24(4):585-594. doi: 10.1007/s10339-023-01152-2. Epub 2023 Aug 19.
4
Baseline Differences in Anxiety Affect Attention and tDCS-Mediated Learning.焦虑的基线差异影响注意力和经颅直流电刺激介导的学习。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Mar 3;15:541369. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.541369. eCollection 2021.
5
Emergence of abstract rules in the primate brain.灵长类大脑中抽象规则的出现。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2020 Nov;21(11):595-610. doi: 10.1038/s41583-020-0364-5. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
6
The neurocognitive gains of diagnostic reasoning training using simulated interactive veterinary cases.使用模拟互动兽医病例进行诊断推理训练的神经认知增益。
Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 27;9(1):19878. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56404-z.
7
Decoding rule search domain in the left inferior frontal gyrus.左侧下额前回的解码规则搜索域。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 16;13(3):e0194054. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194054. eCollection 2018.
8
Neural substrates of motor and cognitive dysfunctions in SCA2 patients: A network based statistics analysis.脊髓小脑共济失调2型(SCA2)患者运动和认知功能障碍的神经基质:基于网络的统计分析
Neuroimage Clin. 2017 Mar 25;14:719-725. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2017.03.009. eCollection 2017.
9
Brain networks for visual creativity: a functional connectivity study of planning a visual artwork.视觉创造力的大脑网络:规划视觉艺术作品的功能连接研究。
Sci Rep. 2016 Dec 19;6:39185. doi: 10.1038/srep39185.
10
Dissociable roles of medial and lateral PFC in rule learning.内侧和外侧前额叶皮质在规则学习中的不同作用。
Brain Behav. 2016 Aug 19;6(11):e00551. doi: 10.1002/brb3.551. eCollection 2016 Nov.

本文引用的文献

1
Lateral prefrontal cortex subregions make dissociable contributions during fluid reasoning.外侧前额叶皮层的不同亚区在流畅推理中发挥着不同的作用。
Cereb Cortex. 2011 Jan;21(1):1-10. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhq085. Epub 2010 May 18.
2
Frontal cortex and the discovery of abstract action rules.额叶皮质与抽象动作规则的发现。
Neuron. 2010 Apr 29;66(2):315-26. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.03.025.
3
Two views of brain function.两种大脑功能观。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2010 Apr;14(4):180-90. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.01.008. Epub 2010 Mar 4.
4
How green is the grass on the other side? Frontopolar cortex and the evidence in favor of alternative courses of action.对岸的草有多绿?额极皮质与支持其他行动方案的证据。
Neuron. 2009 Jun 11;62(5):733-43. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.05.014.
5
Left, but not right, rostrolateral prefrontal cortex meets a stringent test of the relational integration hypothesis.左侧而非右侧的喙外侧前额叶皮层符合关系整合假说的严格测试。
Neuroimage. 2009 May 15;46(1):338-42. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.01.064. Epub 2009 Feb 11.
6
Disentangling the prefrontal network for rule selection by means of a non-verbal variant of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test.通过威斯康星卡片分类测试的非语言变体来解析前额叶网络进行规则选择的机制。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2009 May;30(5):1734-43. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20637.
7
Age-related alterations in default mode network: impact on working memory performance.与年龄相关的默认模式网络改变:对工作记忆表现的影响。
Neurobiol Aging. 2010 May;31(5):839-52. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2008.05.022. Epub 2008 Jul 31.
8
The target selective neural response--similarity, ambiguity, and learning effects.目标选择性神经反应——相似性、模糊性和学习效应。
PLoS One. 2008 Jun 25;3(6):e2520. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002520.
9
Anterior prefrontal function and the limits of human decision-making.前额叶前部功能与人类决策的局限性。
Science. 2007 Oct 26;318(5850):594-8. doi: 10.1126/science.1142995.
10
Functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence for a hierarchical organization of the prefrontal cortex.前额叶皮质分层组织的功能磁共振成像证据。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 Dec;19(12):2082-99. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.12.2082.