Bhugaloo Aa, Abdullah Bjj, Siow Ys, Ng Kh
Department of Biomedical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Biomed Imaging Interv J. 2006 Apr;2(2):e12. doi: 10.2349/biij.2.2.e12. Epub 2006 Apr 1.
The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the specificity and sensitivity of diffusion weighted MR imaging (DWI) in the differentiation and characterisation between benign and malignant vertebral compression fractures compared with conventional T1 WI, T2 WI and fat suppressed contrast enhanced T1 WI in the Malaysian population.
Thirty five patients with 68 vertebral compression fractures were imaged using the conventional T1 WI, T2 WI, fat suppressed contrast enhanced T1-weighted, and steady state free precession diffusion-weighted (SSFP DWI) sequences on a 1.5 T MR scanner. Signal intensities were analysed qualitatively for all the sequences by comparison to adjacent normal marrow. A quantitative assessment of the signal intensity in the SSFP DWI was also performed.
T1 WI and T2 WI images are of limited diagnostic value because of the variability in signal intensities. Contrast enhanced images had sensitivity and specificity of 93% and 71%, respectively with a negative predictive value (NPV) of 93%. On diffusion-weighted MR imaging, sensitivity was 87% with specificity of 92%. The positive predicative value (PPV) and NPV were both 90%. The quantitative assessment of ratio revealed a statistical significant difference between the benign (0.96) and the malignant (1.73) group of lesion (Mann-Whitney U-test, p=0.0001).
We found that absence of contrast enhancement has a high NPV (90%) while SSFP DWI has both a high PPV (90%) and high NPV (90%) in detecting malignant vertebral compression fractures. Furthermore, in our study the ratio of lesion intensity technique offers an excellent criterion to differentiate between the benign and malignant lesions, and the presence of iso- or hypointensity of the collapsed vertebral bodies is suggestive of a benign lesion while hyperintensity is highly suggestive of malignancy. We also found that using the NLMR showed a statistical significant difference between the malignant and benign groups (p<0.0001) with osteoporotic and malignant lesions have mean values of 0.96 (SD 0.25) and 1.73 (SD 0.4) respectively.
本研究的主要目的是评估在马来西亚人群中,与传统的T1加权成像(T1WI)、T2加权成像(T2WI)及脂肪抑制对比增强T1加权成像相比,扩散加权磁共振成像(DWI)在鉴别良性与恶性椎体压缩性骨折中的特异性和敏感性。
对35例患有68处椎体压缩性骨折的患者,使用1.5T磁共振扫描仪,采用传统的T1WI、T2WI、脂肪抑制对比增强T1加权成像及稳态自由进动扩散加权成像(SSFP DWI)序列进行成像。通过与相邻正常骨髓比较,对所有序列的信号强度进行定性分析。同时对SSFP DWI中的信号强度进行定量评估。
由于信号强度的变异性,T1WI和T2WI图像的诊断价值有限。对比增强图像的敏感性和特异性分别为93%和71%,阴性预测值(NPV)为93%。在扩散加权磁共振成像中,敏感性为87%,特异性为92%。阳性预测值(PPV)和NPV均为90%。病变比值的定量评估显示,良性(0.96)和恶性(1.73)病变组之间存在统计学显著差异(曼-惠特尼U检验,p = 0.0001)。
我们发现无对比增强具有较高的NPV(90%),而SSFP DWI在检测恶性椎体压缩性骨折时具有较高的PPV(90%)和NPV(90%)。此外,在我们的研究中,病变强度比值技术为区分良性和恶性病变提供了一个很好的标准,塌陷椎体的等信号或低信号提示良性病变,而高信号高度提示恶性病变。我们还发现,使用归一化局部磁共振(NLMR)显示恶性组和良性组之间存在统计学显著差异(p < 0.0001),骨质疏松性病变和恶性病变的平均值分别为0.96(标准差0.25)和1.73(标准差0.4)。