• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

ADC 作为一种有用的诊断工具,可用于区分良性和恶性椎体骨髓病变和压缩性骨折:系统评价和荟萃分析。

ADC as a useful diagnostic tool for differentiating benign and malignant vertebral bone marrow lesions and compression fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.

Department of Radiology, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, 891 Dongnam-ro, Gangdong-gu, Seoul, 05278, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Eur Radiol. 2018 Jul;28(7):2890-2902. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5330-5. Epub 2018 Feb 15.

DOI:10.1007/s00330-018-5330-5
PMID:29450718
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess the sensitivity and specificity of quantitative assessment of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) for differentiating benign and malignant vertebral bone marrow lesions (BMLs) and compression fractures (CFs) METHODS: An electronic literature search of MEDLINE and EMBASE was conducted. Bivariate modelling and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic modelling were performed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of ADC for differentiating vertebral BMLs. Subgroup analysis was performed for differentiating benign and malignant vertebral CFs. Meta-regression analyses according to subject, study and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) characteristics were performed.

RESULTS

Twelve eligible studies (748 lesions, 661 patients) were included. The ADC exhibited a pooled sensitivity of 0.89 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.80-0.94) and a pooled specificity of 0.87 (95% CI 0.78-0.93) for differentiating benign and malignant vertebral BMLs. In addition, the pooled sensitivity and specificity for differentiating benign and malignant CFs were 0.92 (95% CI 0.82-0.97) and 0.91 (95% CI 0.87-0.94), respectively. In the meta-regression analysis, the DWI slice thickness was a significant factor affecting heterogeneity (p < 0.01); thinner slice thickness (< 5 mm) showed higher specificity (95%) than thicker slice thickness (81%).

CONCLUSIONS

Quantitative assessment of ADC is a useful diagnostic tool for differentiating benign and malignant vertebral BMLs and CFs.

KEY POINTS

• Quantitative assessment of ADC is useful in differentiating vertebral BMLs. • Quantitative ADC assessment for BMLs had sensitivity of 89%, specificity of 87%. • Quantitative ADC assessment for CFs had sensitivity of 92%, specificity of 91%. • The specificity is highest (95%) with thinner (< 5 mm) DWI slice thickness.

摘要

目的

评估表观扩散系数(ADC)定量评估鉴别良性和恶性椎体骨髓病变(BML)和压缩性骨折(CF)的敏感性和特异性。

方法

对 MEDLINE 和 EMBASE 进行电子文献检索。进行双变量建模和分层汇总受试者工作特征曲线建模,以评估 ADC 鉴别椎体 BML 的诊断性能。进行亚组分析以鉴别良性和恶性椎体 CF。根据研究对象、研究和弥散加权成像(DWI)特征进行荟萃回归分析。

结果

纳入 12 项符合条件的研究(748 个病变,661 例患者)。ADC 鉴别良性和恶性椎体 BML 的汇总敏感性为 0.89(95%置信区间 [CI] 0.80-0.94),特异性为 0.87(95% CI 0.78-0.93)。此外,ADC 鉴别良性和恶性 CF 的汇总敏感性和特异性分别为 0.92(95% CI 0.82-0.97)和 0.91(95% CI 0.87-0.94)。荟萃回归分析中,DWI 层厚是影响异质性的重要因素(p<0.01);较薄的层厚(<5mm)比较厚的层厚(81%)具有更高的特异性(95%)。

结论

ADC 定量评估是鉴别良性和恶性椎体 BML 和 CF 的有用诊断工具。

相似文献

1
ADC as a useful diagnostic tool for differentiating benign and malignant vertebral bone marrow lesions and compression fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.ADC 作为一种有用的诊断工具,可用于区分良性和恶性椎体骨髓病变和压缩性骨折:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Radiol. 2018 Jul;28(7):2890-2902. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5330-5. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
2
Accuracy of quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging for differentiating benign and malignant pancreatic lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.定量扩散加权成像鉴别良恶性胰腺病变的准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Radiol. 2021 Oct;31(10):7746-7759. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-07880-3. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
3
Diagnostic performance of dual-energy CT for the detection of bone marrow oedema: a systematic review and meta-analysis.双能 CT 检测骨髓水肿的诊断性能:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Radiol. 2018 Oct;28(10):4182-4194. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5411-5. Epub 2018 Apr 20.
4
Perfusion MRI as a diagnostic biomarker for differentiating glioma from brain metastasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.灌注 MRI 作为鉴别脑胶质瘤与脑转移瘤的诊断生物标志物:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Radiol. 2018 Sep;28(9):3819-3831. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5335-0. Epub 2018 Apr 4.
5
Transabdominal ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound for diagnosis of gallbladder polyps.经腹超声和内镜超声用于胆囊息肉的诊断。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 15;8(8):CD012233. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012233.pub2.
6
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
7
Head-To-Head Comparison Between High- and Standard-b-Value DWI for Detecting Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.高 b 值与标准 b 值弥散加权成像检测前列腺癌的头对头比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Jan;210(1):91-100. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.18480. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
8
Magnetic resonance perfusion for differentiating low-grade from high-grade gliomas at first presentation.首次就诊时磁共振灌注成像用于鉴别低级别与高级别胶质瘤
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 22;1(1):CD011551. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011551.pub2.
9
Guaiac-based faecal occult blood tests versus faecal immunochemical tests for colorectal cancer screening in average-risk individuals.基于愈创木脂的粪便潜血试验与粪便免疫化学试验用于一般风险人群结直肠癌筛查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 6;6(6):CD009276. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009276.pub2.
10
Thoracic imaging tests for the diagnosis of COVID-19.用于 COVID-19 诊断的胸部影像学检查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 16;5(5):CD013639. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013639.pub5.

引用本文的文献

1
Diffusion weighted imaging in musculoskeletal system: where are we now?肌肉骨骼系统中的扩散加权成像:我们目前处于什么阶段?
BJR Open. 2025 Jul 22;7(1):tzaf019. doi: 10.1093/bjro/tzaf019. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Assessment of chemical-shift and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in differentiating malignant and benign vertebral lesions in oncologic patients. A single institution experience.评估化学位移和弥散加权磁共振成像在区分恶性和良性肿瘤患者椎体病变中的作用。单机构经验。
Radiol Oncol. 2024 Oct 4;58(4):527-534. doi: 10.2478/raon-2024-0049. eCollection 2024 Dec 1.
3
Review of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging in multiple myeloma.

本文引用的文献

1
Solid bone tumors of the spine: Diagnostic performance of apparent diffusion coefficient measured using diffusion-weighted MRI using histology as a reference standard.脊柱骨肿瘤:以组织学为参考标准的磁共振扩散加权成像测量表观扩散系数的诊断性能。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018 Apr;47(4):1034-1042. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25826. Epub 2017 Jul 29.
2
Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of focal vertebral bone marrow lesions: initial experience of the differentiation of nodular hyperplastic hematopoietic bone marrow from malignant lesions.局灶性椎体骨髓病变的体素内不相干运动扩散加权磁共振成像:结节性增生性造血骨髓与恶性病变鉴别的初步经验
Skeletal Radiol. 2017 May;46(5):675-683. doi: 10.1007/s00256-017-2603-z. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
3
全身磁共振成像在多发性骨髓瘤中的应用评价。
Jpn J Radiol. 2024 Dec;42(12):1381-1391. doi: 10.1007/s11604-024-01635-y. Epub 2024 Aug 1.
4
Multiparametric quantification of T1 and T2 relaxation time of bone metastasis in comparison with red or fatty bone marrow using magnetic resonance fingerprinting.利用磁共振指纹技术对骨转移瘤 T1 和 T2 弛豫时间进行多参数定量分析,并与红骨髓或黄骨髓进行比较。
Skeletal Radiol. 2024 Jun;53(6):1071-1080. doi: 10.1007/s00256-023-04521-2. Epub 2023 Dec 2.
5
Neoplastic and Non-Neoplastic Vertebral Marrow Pathologies: Can the Conventional and Advanced MRI Sequences Provide a Definitive Answer?肿瘤性和非肿瘤性椎体骨髓病变:传统和先进的MRI序列能否提供明确答案?
Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2023 Oct 5;33(4):438-439. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1775571. eCollection 2023 Oct.
6
A 3D Radiomics-Based Artificial Neural Network Model for Benign Versus Malignant Vertebral Compression Fracture Classification in MRI.基于 3D 放射组学的人工神经网络模型在 MRI 中用于良恶性椎体压缩性骨折分类。
J Digit Imaging. 2023 Aug;36(4):1565-1577. doi: 10.1007/s10278-023-00847-4. Epub 2023 May 30.
7
Deep learning-based artificial intelligence model for classification of vertebral compression fractures: A multicenter diagnostic study.基于深度学习的人工智能模型在椎体压缩性骨折分类中的应用:一项多中心诊断研究。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Mar 22;14:1025749. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1025749. eCollection 2023.
8
Application of Machine Learning for Differentiating Bone Malignancy on Imaging: A Systematic Review.机器学习在影像学上鉴别骨恶性肿瘤的应用:一项系统综述。
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Mar 18;15(6):1837. doi: 10.3390/cancers15061837.
9
Advances in Bone Marrow Imaging: Strengths and Limitations from a Clinical Perspective.骨髓成像的进展:从临床角度看优势和局限性。
Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2023 Feb;27(1):3-21. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1761612. Epub 2023 Mar 3.
10
[Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Spine].[脊柱的扩散加权磁共振成像]
Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe Chi. 2020 Jan;81(1):58-69. doi: 10.3348/jksr.2020.81.1.58. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
Single-Shot Echo-Planar Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging at 3T and 1.5T for Differentiation of Benign Vertebral Fracture Edema and Tumor Infiltration.3T和1.5T单次激发回波平面扩散加权磁共振成像用于鉴别良性椎体骨折水肿和肿瘤浸润
Korean J Radiol. 2016 Sep-Oct;17(5):590-7. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2016.17.5.590. Epub 2016 Aug 23.
4
Successful Publication of Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Studies Evaluating Diagnostic Test Accuracy.评估诊断试验准确性研究的系统评价和Meta分析的成功发表。
Korean J Radiol. 2016 Jan-Feb;17(1):5-6. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2016.17.1.5. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
5
Standard-b-value vs low-b-value DWI for differentiation of benign and malignant vertebral fractures: a meta-analysis.标准b值与低b值扩散加权成像在鉴别良性和恶性椎体骨折中的应用:一项荟萃分析
Br J Radiol. 2016;89(1058):20150384. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20150384. Epub 2015 Nov 27.
6
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Studies Evaluating Diagnostic Test Accuracy: A Practical Review for Clinical Researchers-Part II. Statistical Methods of Meta-Analysis.评估诊断试验准确性的研究的系统评价与Meta分析:临床研究者实用综述 - 第二部分。Meta分析的统计方法
Korean J Radiol. 2015 Nov-Dec;16(6):1188-96. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2015.16.6.1188. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
7
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Studies Evaluating Diagnostic Test Accuracy: A Practical Review for Clinical Researchers-Part I. General Guidance and Tips.评估诊断试验准确性研究的系统评价与Meta分析:临床研究者实用综述——第一部分。一般指南与提示
Korean J Radiol. 2015 Nov-Dec;16(6):1175-87. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2015.16.6.1175. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
8
Physiological Background of Differences in Quantitative Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Between Acute Malignant and Benign Vertebral Body Fractures: Correlation of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient With Quantitative Perfusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using the 2-Compartment Exchange Model.急性恶性与良性椎体骨折之间定量扩散加权磁共振成像差异的生理背景:基于双室交换模型的表观扩散系数与定量灌注磁共振成像的相关性
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2015 Sep-Oct;39(5):643-8. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000281.
9
Differentiation between focal malignant marrow-replacing lesions and benign red marrow deposition of the spine with T2*-corrected fat-signal fraction map using a three-echo volume interpolated breath-hold gradient echo Dixon sequence.使用三回波呼吸门控梯度回波 Dixon 序列的 T2*-校正脂肪信号分数图对脊柱局灶性恶性骨髓替代病变与良性红骨髓沉积进行鉴别诊断。
Korean J Radiol. 2014 Nov-Dec;15(6):781-91. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2014.15.6.781. Epub 2014 Nov 7.
10
Quantitative evaluation of benign and malignant vertebral fractures with diffusion-weighted MRI: what is the optimum combination of b values for ADC-based lesion differentiation with the single-shot turbo spin-echo sequence?扩散加权 MRI 对良恶性椎体骨折的定量评估:单次激发快速自旋回波序列基于 ADC 值的病变鉴别最佳 b 值组合是什么?
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Sep;203(3):582-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.11632.