• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用两种不同风险评估量表对急性护理中医院获得性压疮的发生率:一项回顾性研究的结果

Incidence of hospital-acquired pressure ulcers in acute care using two different risk assessment scales: results of a retrospective study.

作者信息

Jackson Stephanie Smith

机构信息

Sentara Norfolk General Hospital, Norfolk, VA 23507, USA.

出版信息

Ostomy Wound Manage. 2011 May;57(5):20-7.

PMID:21617261
Abstract

More than one million people develop pressure ulcers (PU) every year in the US - a major problem that leads to increased morbidity and mortality. A hospital-acquired PU (HAPU) is defined as any ulcer noted 24 or more hours after hospital admission. The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the incidence of HAPUs between two 1-year periods of time (March 1, 2007 through March 17, 2008 and March 18, 2008 through March 31, 2009) at an acute care facility. Records from all admitted adult medical-surgical and critical care patients along with routinely submitted quality control reports on patients who acquired PUs during hospitalization were reviewed and abstracted. A locally developed PU risk assessment instrument (SST) was used during the first time period and the Braden Scale (BS) was used during the second time period. The overall PU incidence was 368 in 41,840 patient admissions (8.80 per 1,000); 9.49 in the SST and 8.08 in the BS patient sample (P = 0.125). No significant differences in patient age, race, and PU severity or location were observed. However, the incidence of more severe ulcers (Stage III and Stage IV) was lower in the BS group (0.5667 in the SST group compared to 0.2419 per 1,000 admissions in the BS group) even though median patient length of stay was longer (28 days and 34 days in the SST and BS groups, respectively), suggesting that use of a valid and reliable PU risk assessment instrument may reduce the incidence of severe PUs. Study design and sample size limit the ability to generalize the results of this study. Controlled clinical studies comparing the effect of different PU risk assessment instruments on PU incidence are needed.

摘要

在美国,每年有超过100万人发生压疮(PU),这是一个导致发病率和死亡率上升的主要问题。医院获得性压疮(HAPU)被定义为入院24小时或更长时间后出现的任何溃疡。这项回顾性研究的目的是比较一家急症护理机构在两个1年期(2007年3月1日至2008年3月17日和2008年3月18日至2009年3月31日)之间HAPU的发生率。对所有入院的成人内科-外科和重症监护患者的记录以及关于住院期间发生压疮患者的常规提交的质量控制报告进行了审查和摘要。在第一个时间段使用了当地开发的压疮风险评估工具(SST),在第二个时间段使用了Braden量表(BS)。在41840例患者入院中,总体压疮发生率为368例(每1000例中有8.80例);SST患者样本中为9.49例,BS患者样本中为8.08例(P = 0.125)。在患者年龄、种族、压疮严重程度或部位方面未观察到显著差异。然而,更严重溃疡(III期和IV期)的发生率在BS组中较低(SST组中每1000例入院中有0.5667例,而BS组中每1000例入院中有0.2419例),尽管患者中位住院时间更长(SST组和BS组分别为28天和34天),这表明使用有效且可靠的压疮风险评估工具可能会降低严重压疮的发生率。研究设计和样本量限制了本研究结果的推广能力。需要进行对照临床研究来比较不同压疮风险评估工具对压疮发生率的影响。

相似文献

1
Incidence of hospital-acquired pressure ulcers in acute care using two different risk assessment scales: results of a retrospective study.使用两种不同风险评估量表对急性护理中医院获得性压疮的发生率:一项回顾性研究的结果
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2011 May;57(5):20-7.
2
Risk assessment study of the pressure ulcers in intensive care unit patients.重症监护病房患者压疮的风险评估研究
Eur J Intern Med. 2009 Jul;20(4):394-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2008.11.001. Epub 2008 Dec 6.
3
Prospective, nonrandomized controlled trials to compare the effect of a silk-like fabric to standard hospital linens on the rate of hospital-acquired pressure ulcers.前瞻性、非随机对照试验,比较丝绸样织物与标准医院床单对医院获得性压疮发生率的影响。
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2012 Oct;58(10):14-31.
4
A retrospective, nonrandomized, beforeand- after study of the effect of linens constructed of synthetic silk-like fabric on pressure ulcer incidence.一项关于合成丝样织物制成的床单对压疮发生率影响的回顾性、非随机、前后对照研究。
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2013 Apr;59(4):28-30, 32--34.
5
Heel pressure ulcers in orthopedic patients: a prospective study of incidence and risk factors in an acute care hospital.骨科患者足跟压疮:急性护理医院发病率及危险因素的前瞻性研究。
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2010 Feb 1;56(2):44-54.
6
The incidence of pressure ulcers in surgical patients: a sample hospital in Turkey.土耳其一家样本医院外科患者压疮的发生率
J Clin Nurs. 2006 Apr;15(4):413-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01369.x.
7
Building information for systematic improvement of the prevention of hospital-acquired pressure ulcers with statistical process control charts and regression.利用统计过程控制图和回归建立信息系统,以改善医院获得性压疮的预防。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Jun;21(6):473-80. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000340. Epub 2012 Mar 23.
8
Pressure ulcer risk assessment immediately after cardiac surgery--does it make a difference? A comparison of three pressure ulcer risk assessment instruments within a cardiac surgery population.心脏手术后立即进行压疮风险评估——会有不同吗?心脏手术人群中三种压疮风险评估工具的比较。
Nurs Crit Care. 2007 Jan-Feb;12(1):42-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-5153.2006.00198.x.
9
Pressure ulcers, hospital complications, and disease severity: impact on hospital costs and length of stay.压疮、医院并发症与疾病严重程度:对医院成本和住院时间的影响。
Adv Wound Care. 1999 Jan-Feb;12(1):22-30.
10
Pressure ulcers in German nursing homes and acute care hospitals: prevalence, frequency, and ulcer characteristics.德国养老院和急症护理医院中的压疮:患病率、发生频率及溃疡特征。
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2006 Feb;52(2):20-33.

引用本文的文献

1
The Incidence of Pressure Ulcers in Surgical Patients: A Systematic Review.外科患者压疮的发生率:一项系统评价。
Int Wound J. 2025 Aug;22(8):e70738. doi: 10.1111/iwj.70738.
2
Organisation of health services for preventing and treating pressure ulcers.预防和治疗压疮的卫生服务组织。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Dec 9;12(12):CD012132. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012132.pub2.
3
Understanding the Hawthorne effect in wound research-A scoping review.理解创面研究中的霍桑效应:范围综述。
Int Wound J. 2018 Dec;15(6):1010-1024. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12968. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
4
A prediction model for adverse outcome in hospitalized patients with diabetes.糖尿病住院患者不良结局的预测模型。
Diabetes Care. 2013 Nov;36(11):3566-72. doi: 10.2337/dc13-0452. Epub 2013 Sep 11.
5
CMS' Hospital-Acquired Conditions for the Neurohospitalist.医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)针对神经科住院医师的医院获得性疾病情况
Neurohospitalist. 2012 Jan;2(1):18-27. doi: 10.1177/1941874411426887.