Sheffield Health and Social Care NHS Foundation Trust, Community Mental Health Team, Sheffield, UK.
Br J Gen Pract. 2011 May;61(586):e279-89. doi: 10.3399/bjgp11X572472.
The National Institute for Health and clinical Excellence (NICE) depression guideline (2004) and the updated Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) (2006) in general practice have introduced the concepts of screening severity assessment, for example using the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9), and 'stepped care' for depression.
To explore primary care practitioner perspectives on the clinical utility of the NICE guideline and the impact of the QOF on diagnosis and management of depression in routine practice.
Qualitative study using focus groups from four multidisciplinary practice teams with diverse populations in south Yorkshire.
Four focus groups were conducted, using a topic guide and audiotaping. There were 38 participants: GPs, nurses, doctors in training, mental health workers, and a manager. Data analysis was iterative and thematic.
The NICE guideline, with its embedded principles of holism and evidence-based practice, was viewed positively but its impact was compromised by resource and practitioner barriers to implementation. The perceived imposition of the screening questions and severity assessments (PHQ-9) with no responsive training had required practitioners to work hard to minimise negative impacts on their work, for example: constantly adapting consultations to tick boxes; avoiding triggering open displays of distress without the time to offer appropriate care; positively managing how their patients were labelled. Further confusion was experienced around the evolving content of psychological interventions for depression.
Organisational barriers to the implementation of the NICE guideline and the limited scope of the QOF highlight the need for policy makers to work more effectively with the complex realities of general practice in order to systematically improve the quality and delivery of 'managed' care for depression.
国家卫生与临床卓越研究所(NICE)的抑郁指南(2004 年)和一般实践中的更新后的质量和结果框架(QOF)(2006 年)引入了筛查严重程度评估的概念,例如使用患者健康问卷 9(PHQ-9)和“分级护理”治疗抑郁症。
探讨初级保健医生对 NICE 指南的临床实用性以及 QOF 对常规实践中抑郁症诊断和管理的影响的看法。
在南约克郡的四个多学科实践团队中,使用焦点小组进行了定性研究,这些团队的人群各异。
进行了 4 次焦点小组讨论,使用主题指南和录音。有 38 名参与者:全科医生、护士、受训医生、心理健康工作者和经理。数据分析是迭代和主题式的。
NICE 指南及其固有的整体和循证实践原则受到了积极的评价,但由于资源和从业者实施障碍,其影响受到了损害。对筛查问题和严重程度评估(PHQ-9)的感知强加,而没有相应的培训,要求从业者努力减少对其工作的负面影响,例如:不断调整咨询以满足框框要求;避免在没有时间提供适当护理的情况下触发明显的痛苦表现;积极管理患者的标签。围绕不断发展的抑郁症心理干预内容,还出现了进一步的困惑。
实施 NICE 指南的组织障碍和 QOF 的有限范围突出表明,政策制定者需要更有效地与一般实践的复杂现实合作,以系统地提高“管理”抑郁症护理的质量和交付。