• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国麻醉研究人员的文献计量学研究

Bibliometrics of anaesthesia researchers in the UK.

机构信息

Division of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre Campus, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK.

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 2011 Sep;107(3):351-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer124. Epub 2011 May 26.

DOI:10.1093/bja/aer124
PMID:21622666
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Bibliometrics provide surrogate measures of the quality and quantity of research undertaken by departments and individuals. Previous reports have suggested that academic anaesthesia research in the UK is in decline. We wished to provide a comprehensive description of current and historical published output of UK anaesthesia researchers.

METHODS

Bibliometric indices (Web of Science(®)) were calculated for anaesthesia researchers in the UK for the whole period covered by the database, and for 2004-8. A parallel search was made using the Scholarometer™ tool, which parses output from Google Scholar™. Calculated indices included total number of publications; total number of citations; citations per paper; h-index; g-index; and modified impact index.

RESULTS

One hundred and four individuals and 23 academic departments were identified. Median values (inter-quartile range) for the indices were: total papers 57 (24-95) (individuals for the whole period), 11 (6-20) (individuals 2004-8), 50 (30-70) (departments 2004-8); total number of citations 571 (175-1328), 93 (38-207), 383 (239-845); h-index 13 (8-20), 6 (3-8), 11 (9-14). Four departments were ranked in the top 5 for all indices.

CONCLUSIONS

The general distribution of bibliometric data is similar to that seen in other specialities in Europe and North America. Four departments contribute to more than 50% of published anaesthesia research output in this data set. These data provide useful comparative tools for individuals, departments, and national bodies.

摘要

背景

文献计量学提供了部门和个人所进行研究的质量和数量的替代衡量标准。先前的报告表明,英国的学术麻醉研究正在下降。我们希望提供英国麻醉研究人员当前和历史上发表成果的全面描述。

方法

为英国麻醉研究人员计算了整个数据库和 2004-2008 年期间的文献计量学指标(Web of Science(®))。使用 Scholarometer™工具进行了平行搜索,该工具解析了来自 Google Scholar™的输出。计算的指标包括出版物总数;总引用数;每篇论文的引用数;h 指数;g 指数;和修正影响指数。

结果

确定了 104 名个人和 23 个学术部门。指数的中位数(四分位数范围)为:总论文 57(24-95)(整个时期的个人),11(6-20)(2004-2008 年的个人),11(6-20)(2004-2008 年的个人),11(6-20)(2004-2008 年的个人),11(6-20)(2004-2008 年的个人),11(6-20)(2004-2008 年的个人),11(6-20)(2004-2008 年的个人),11(6-20)(2004-2008 年的个人),11(6-20)(2004-2008 年的个人);总引用数 571(175-1328),93(38-207),383(239-845);h 指数 13(8-20),6(3-8),11(9-14)。有四个部门在所有指标中排名前 5 位。

结论

文献计量学数据的总体分布与欧洲和北美的其他专业相似。有四个部门贡献了本数据集发表的麻醉研究成果的 50%以上。这些数据为个人、部门和国家机构提供了有用的比较工具。

相似文献

1
Bibliometrics of anaesthesia researchers in the UK.英国麻醉研究人员的文献计量学研究
Br J Anaesth. 2011 Sep;107(3):351-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer124. Epub 2011 May 26.
2
Bibliometric analysis of anaesthesia journal editorial board members: correlation between journal impact factor and the median h-index of its board members.麻醉学期刊编委会成员的文献计量学分析:期刊影响因子与编委中位 h 指数的相关性。
Br J Anaesth. 2011 Sep;107(3):357-61. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer191. Epub 2011 Jun 23.
3
Analysis of the distribution and scholarly output from National Institute of Academic Anaesthesia (NIAA) research grants.分析国家学术麻醉研究所(NIAA)研究资助的分布和学术成果。
Anaesthesia. 2018 Jun;73(6):679-691. doi: 10.1111/anae.14277. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
4
Scientific output quality of 40 globally top-ranked medical researchers in the field of osteoporosis.骨质疏松症领域全球排名前 40 位的医学研究人员的科研产出质量。
Arch Osteoporos. 2018 Mar 26;13(1):35. doi: 10.1007/s11657-018-0446-4.
5
Bibliometric evaluation of pediatric neurosurgery in North America.北美小儿神经外科的文献计量学评估
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2014 Dec;14(6):695-703. doi: 10.3171/2014.8.PEDS1488. Epub 2014 Oct 3.
6
h-Indices in a university department of anaesthesia: an evaluation of their feasibility, reliability, and validity as an assessment of academic performance.麻醉学系的 h 指数:评估其作为学术表现评估的可行性、可靠性和有效性。
Br J Anaesth. 2011 Mar;106(3):325-30. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq403. Epub 2011 Jan 21.
7
The academic productivity and impact of the University of Toronto Neurosurgery Program as assessed by manuscripts published and their number of citations.多伦多大学神经外科项目的学术产出及影响力,通过已发表的手稿及其被引用次数来评估。
J Neurosurg. 2015 Sep;123(3):561-70. doi: 10.3171/2014.12.JNS142553. Epub 2015 Jun 26.
8
Bibliometric indices: defining academic productivity and citation rates of researchers, departments and journals.文献计量指标:定义研究人员、部门和期刊的学术生产力和引文率。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2018 Feb;10(2):102-106. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013265. Epub 2017 Aug 20.
9
Academic impact rankings of neurosurgical units in the U.K. and Ireland, as assessed with the h-index.通过h指数评估的英国和爱尔兰神经外科单位的学术影响力排名。
Br J Neurosurg. 2015;29(5):637-43. doi: 10.3109/02688697.2015.1039488. Epub 2015 May 21.
10
An analysis of publication productivity for 1225 academic neurosurgeons and 99 departments in the United States.对美国 1225 名学术神经外科医生和 99 个部门的出版物生产力进行分析。
J Neurosurg. 2014 Mar;120(3):746-55. doi: 10.3171/2013.11.JNS131708. Epub 2013 Dec 20.

引用本文的文献

1
The Impact of Fellowship Training on Peer-Reviewed Publication Productivity in Academic Anesthesiologists as Evaluated by the h-Index.以h指数评估专科培训对学术麻醉医师同行评审出版物产出的影响
Adv Cancer Educ Qual Improv. 2025 Jun;1(1). doi: 10.52519/aceqi.25.1.1.a8.
2
Hot spots and frontiers in bone-tendon interface research: a bibliometric analysis and visualization from 2000 to 2023.骨-肌腱界面研究的热点与前沿:2000年至2023年的文献计量分析与可视化
Front Surg. 2024 Jan 24;10:1326564. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1326564. eCollection 2023.
3
Bibliometric Evaluation of the 100 Top-Cited Articles on Anesthesiology.
麻醉学领域100篇高被引论文的文献计量学评价
Cureus. 2023 Dec 22;15(12):e50959. doi: 10.7759/cureus.50959. eCollection 2023 Dec.
4
Bibliometric analysis of recent research on the association between TRPV1 and inflammation.TRPV1 与炎症相关性的研究进展的文献计量分析。
Channels (Austin). 2023 Dec;17(1):2189038. doi: 10.1080/19336950.2023.2189038.
5
Use of the bibliometric in rare diseases: taking Wilson disease personally.应用文献计量学于罕见病:以个体为中心看肝豆状核变性。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2022 Jul 29;17(1):297. doi: 10.1186/s13023-022-02459-7.
6
Academic Publication of Anesthesiology From a Bibliographic Perspective From 1999 to 2018: Comparative Analysis Using Subject-Field Dataset and Department Dataset.从文献计量学角度看1999年至2018年麻醉学的学术出版物:使用学科领域数据集和部门数据集的比较分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Sep 29;8:658833. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.658833. eCollection 2021.
7
[On the quality of bibliometric analyses].[论文献计量分析的质量]
Anaesthesist. 2021 Oct;70(10):863-865. doi: 10.1007/s00101-021-01030-6. Epub 2021 Aug 30.
8
Research Output from the Irish Paediatric Hospitals in the Field of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Over 10 Years: A Bibliometric Analysis.爱尔兰儿科医院在麻醉与重症监护领域10年的研究产出:一项文献计量分析
Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2020 Jun;48(3):223-228. doi: 10.5152/TJAR.2019.06787. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
9
[A bibliometric analysis of the field of anesthesia during 2009-2018].[2009 - 2018年麻醉领域的文献计量分析]
Braz J Anesthesiol. 2020 Mar-Apr;70(2):140-152. doi: 10.1016/j.bjan.2020.02.003. Epub 2020 May 22.
10
Analysis of the distribution and scholarly output from National Institute of Academic Anaesthesia (NIAA) research grants.分析国家学术麻醉研究所(NIAA)研究资助的分布和学术成果。
Anaesthesia. 2018 Jun;73(6):679-691. doi: 10.1111/anae.14277. Epub 2018 Mar 30.