Laboratoire de Chimie Physique et Microbiologie pour l'Environnement, Nancy-Université, CNRS, Faculté de Pharmacie, 54250 Nancy, France.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011 Jul;77(14):4939-48. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00407-11. Epub 2011 May 27.
We compare for the first time the electrokinetic and aggregation properties of MS2 phage (pH 2.5 to 7, 1 to 100 mM NaNO(3) electrolyte concentration) with those of the corresponding virus-like particles (VLPs), which lack entirely the inner viral RNA component. In line with our previous work (J. Langlet, F. Gaboriaud, C. Gantzer, and J. F. L. Duval, Biophys. J. 94:3293-3312, 2008), it is found that modifying the content of RNA within the virus leads to very distinct electrohydrodynamic and aggregation profiles for MS2 and MS2 VLPs. Under the given pH and concentration conditions, MS2 VLPs exhibit electrophoretic mobility larger in magnitude than that of MS2, and both have similar isoelectric point (IEP) values (∼4). The electrokinetic results reflect a greater permeability of MS2 VLPs to electroosmotic flow, developed within/around these soft particles during their migration under the action of the applied electrical field. Results also support the presence of some remaining negatively charged component within the VLPs. In addition, MS2 phage systematically forms aggregates at pH values below the IEP, regardless of the magnitude of the solution ionic strength, whereas MS2 VLPs aggregate under the strict condition where the pH is relatively equal to the IEP at sufficiently low salt concentrations (<10 mM). It is argued that the stability of VLPs against aggregation and the differences between electrokinetics of MS2 and corresponding VLPs conform to recently developed formalisms for the stability and electrohydrodynamics of soft multilayered particles. The differences between the surface properties of these two kinds of particles reported here suggest that VLPs may not be appropriate for predicting the behavior of pathogenic viruses in aqueous media.
我们首次比较了 MS2 噬菌体(pH 2.5 到 7,1 到 100mMNaNO3 电解质浓度)与相应的病毒样颗粒(VLPs)的电动和聚集性质,后者完全缺乏内部病毒 RNA 成分。与我们之前的工作一致(J. Langlet、F. Gaboriaud、C. Gantzer 和 J. F. L. Duval,Biophys. J. 94:3293-3312, 2008),我们发现改变病毒内部 RNA 的含量会导致 MS2 和 MS2 VLPs 的电动和聚集特性非常不同。在给定的 pH 和浓度条件下,MS2 VLPs 的电泳迁移率比 MS2 大,且两者具有相似的等电点(IEP)值(∼4)。电动结果反映了 MS2 VLPs 对电渗流的更大渗透性,在应用电场作用下,这些软颗粒在迁移过程中会在这些软颗粒内/周围形成电渗流。结果还支持 VLPs 内仍存在一些带负电荷的成分。此外,MS2 噬菌体在 pH 值低于 IEP 值的情况下会系统地形成聚集体,而不管溶液离子强度的大小如何,而 MS2 VLPs 在 pH 值相对等于 IEP 值且盐浓度足够低(<10mM)的严格条件下才会聚集。有人认为,VLPs 对聚集的稳定性以及 MS2 和相应 VLPs 之间电动特性的差异符合最近提出的软多层颗粒稳定性和电动动力学理论。这里报道的这两种颗粒表面特性的差异表明,VLPs 可能不适合预测致病性病毒在水介质中的行为。