• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项使用左旋布比卡因和芬太尼的患者自控硬膜外镇痛(PCEA)与有无背景输注的随机对照试验。

A randomized control trial of patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) with and without a background infusion using levobupivacaine and fentanyl.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia and Resuscitation, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Minerva Anestesiol. 2011 Dec;77(12):1149-54. Epub 2011 May 30.

PMID:21623342
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Continuous infusion associated with patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) is used in many maternal units. This randomized controlled study evaluated the effect of a 10 mL/h background infusion associated with a 10 mL-20 minutes lockout time demand-only PCEA protocol using L-bupivacaine plus fentanyl in terms of local anaesthetic consumption, pain management and maternal satisfaction.

METHODS

Forty consenting parturients were randomly assigned to receive a 0.125% levobupivacaine plus 1.5 mcg/mL fentanyl PCEA (10 mL bolus with a 20 min lock time) with or without a 10 mL/h background infusion. The total volume of local anesthetic, the number of PCEA demand boluses, pain levels, delivery outcome and maternal satisfaction were evaluated.

RESULTS

The total volume of local anaesthetic was 35[20-120] mL in demand-only PCEA group versus 63.8[22.5-123] mL in PCEA plus background infusion group (P<0.001). This decrease in total volume was associated with an increase of self-administrated boluses in demand-only group (3.5[2-12] boluses, versus 1[0-3] bolus in PCEA plus background infusion group) (P<0.001). Pain scores were comparable between groups at any time of the study (P>0.05). Maternal satisfaction did not differ between groups (10[8-10] vs. 10[7-10]; P=0.11).

CONCLUSION

When a levobupivacaine plus fentanyl PCEA protocol with high volume boluses and long lockout interval is used for labour analgesia, the background infusion increased the total local anesthetic dose with no change in pain management and maternal satisfaction.

摘要

背景

在许多产妇单位中,连续输注与患者自控硬膜外镇痛(PCEA)联合使用。本随机对照研究评估了在使用 L-布比卡因加芬太尼的情况下,需求型 PCEA 方案(10 毫升推注,20 分钟锁定时间)中,添加 10 毫升/小时背景输注对局部麻醉药消耗、疼痛管理和产妇满意度的影响。

方法

40 名同意参与的产妇被随机分配接受 0.125%左旋布比卡因加 1.5 mcg/mL 芬太尼 PCEA(10 毫升推注,20 分钟锁定时间),或添加或不添加 10 毫升/小时背景输注。评估局部麻醉药的总用量、PCEA 需求推注的次数、疼痛程度、分娩结局和产妇满意度。

结果

需求型 PCEA 组的局部麻醉药总用量为 35[20-120]毫升,而 PCEA 加背景输注组为 63.8[22.5-123]毫升(P<0.001)。这种总用量的减少与需求型组自我管理推注次数的增加有关(3.5[2-12]次推注,而 PCEA 加背景输注组为 1[0-3]次推注)(P<0.001)。在研究的任何时间,两组的疼痛评分均无差异(P>0.05)。两组产妇满意度无差异(10[8-10]分 vs. 10[7-10]分;P=0.11)。

结论

当使用高容量推注和长锁定间隔的左旋布比卡因加芬太尼 PCEA 方案进行分娩镇痛时,背景输注增加了总局部麻醉药剂量,但疼痛管理和产妇满意度没有变化。

相似文献

1
A randomized control trial of patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) with and without a background infusion using levobupivacaine and fentanyl.一项使用左旋布比卡因和芬太尼的患者自控硬膜外镇痛(PCEA)与有无背景输注的随机对照试验。
Minerva Anestesiol. 2011 Dec;77(12):1149-54. Epub 2011 May 30.
2
Patient-controlled epidural technique improves analgesia for labor but increases cesarean delivery rate compared with the intermittent bolus technique.与间断推注技术相比,患者自控硬膜外技术可改善分娩镇痛,但会增加剖宫产率。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2004 Jul;48(6):732-7. doi: 10.1111/j.0001-5172.2004.00413.x.
3
A comparison of a basal infusion with automated mandatory boluses in parturient-controlled epidural analgesia during labor.分娩期间产妇自控硬膜外镇痛中基础输注与自动强制推注的比较。
Anesth Analg. 2007 Mar;104(3):673-8. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000253236.89376.60.
4
Obstetric outcomes and maternal satisfaction in nulliparous women using patient-controlled epidural analgesia.产妇自控硬膜外镇痛用于初产妇的产科结局和产妇满意度。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Sep;205(3):271.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.06.041. Epub 2011 Jun 17.
5
A double-blind randomized controlled trial of patient-controlled epidural analgesia with or without a background infusion following initial spinal analgesia for labor pain.在初始脊髓镇痛用于分娩疼痛后,进行有或无背景输注的患者自控硬膜外镇痛的双盲随机对照试验。
Int J Obstet Anesth. 2009 Jan;18(1):28-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2008.06.006. Epub 2008 Nov 20.
6
Comparison of continuous background infusion plus demand dose and demand-only parturient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) using ropivacaine combined with sufentanil for labor and delivery.使用罗哌卡因联合舒芬太尼进行持续背景输注加按需剂量与单纯按需产妇自控硬膜外镇痛(PCEA)用于分娩镇痛的比较。
Int J Obstet Anesth. 2005 Apr;14(2):114-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2004.12.005.
7
Programmed intermittent epidural bolus versus continuous epidural infusion for labor analgesia: the effects on maternal motor function and labor outcome. A randomized double-blind study in nulliparous women.程控间歇性硬膜外推注与连续硬膜外输注用于分娩镇痛:对产妇运动功能和分娩结局的影响。一项在初产妇中进行的随机双盲研究。
Anesth Analg. 2011 Oct;113(4):826-31. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31822827b8. Epub 2011 Jul 25.
8
A randomized controlled trial of three patient-controlled epidural analgesia regimens for labor.三种用于分娩的患者自控硬膜外镇痛方案的随机对照试验。
Anesth Analg. 2008 Dec;107(6):1968-72. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181887ffb.
9
Epidural labor analgesia: continuous infusion versus patient-controlled epidural analgesia with background infusion versus without a background infusion.硬膜外分娩镇痛:持续输注与背景输注的患者自控硬膜外镇痛对比以及与无背景输注的对比。
J Pain. 2007 Dec;8(12):970-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2007.07.002. Epub 2007 Aug 7.
10
I.V. paracetamol as an adjunct to patient-controlled epidural analgesia with levobupivacaine and fentanyl in labour: a randomized controlled study.静脉注射对乙酰氨基酚作为左旋布比卡因和芬太尼患者自控硬膜外镇痛在分娩中的辅助手段:一项随机对照研究。
Br J Anaesth. 2016 Nov;117(5):617-622. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew311.

引用本文的文献

1
Pain management during labor: use of intermittent drug delivery devices for improvement of obstetric and neonatal outcome and reduction of healthcare burden: A large non-inferiority randomized clinical trial.分娩期间的疼痛管理:使用间歇性给药装置改善产科和新生儿结局并减轻医疗负担:一项大型非劣效性随机临床试验
J Anesth Analg Crit Care. 2021 Sep 1;1(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s44158-021-00003-w.
2
Comparison of different delivery modalities of epidural analgesia and intravenous analgesia in labour: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.分娩时硬膜外镇痛与静脉镇痛不同给药方式的比较:一项系统评价与网状Meta分析
Can J Anaesth. 2023 Mar;70(3):406-442. doi: 10.1007/s12630-022-02389-9. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
3
Effectiveness of Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesia (PCIA) with Sufentanil Background Infusion for Post-Cesarean Analgesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
舒芬太尼背景输注的患者自控静脉镇痛(PCIA)用于剖宫产术后镇痛的有效性:一项随机对照试验。
J Pain Res. 2022 May 6;15:1355-1364. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S363743. eCollection 2022.
4
Parturient Controlled Epidural Analgesia with and without Basal Infusion of Ropivacaine and Fentanyl: A Randomized Trial.分娩期产妇自控硬膜外镇痛联合与不联合罗哌卡因和芬太尼持续输注的随机试验
Anesth Essays Res. 2020 Jul-Sep;14(3):390-394. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_116_20. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
5
Patient intermittent epidural boluses (PIEB) plus very low continuous epidural infusion (CEI) versus patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) plus continuous epidural infusion (CEI) in primiparous labour: a randomized trial.产妇硬膜外间断推注(PIEB)加非常低浓度持续硬膜外输注(CEI)与产妇自控硬膜外镇痛(PCEA)加持续硬膜外输注(CEI)用于初产妇分娩:一项随机试验。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2019 Oct;33(5):879-885. doi: 10.1007/s10877-018-0229-x. Epub 2018 Nov 30.