Forage Improvement Division, The Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation, Ardmore, OK 73401, USA.
Theor Appl Genet. 2011 Aug;123(4):667-79. doi: 10.1007/s00122-011-1617-5. Epub 2011 May 31.
Segregation distortion (SD) is often observed in plant populations; its presence can affect mapping and breeding applications. To investigate the prevalence of SD in diploid alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.), we developed two unrelated segregating F(1) populations and one F(2) population. We genotyped all populations with SSR markers and assessed SD at each locus in each population. The three maps were syntenic and largely colinear with the Medicago truncatula genome sequence. We found genotypic SD for 24 and 34% of markers in the F(1) populations and 68% of markers in the F(2) population; distorted markers were identified on every linkage group. The smaller percentage of genotypic SD in the F(1) populations could be because they were non-inbred and/or due to non-fully informative markers. For the F(2) population, 60 of 90 mapped markers were distorted, and they clustered into eight segregation distortion regions (SDR). Most SDR identified in the F(1) populations were also identified in the F(2) population. Genotypic SD was primarily due to zygotic rather than allelic distortion, suggesting zygotic not gametic selection is the main cause of SD. On the F(2) linkage map, distorted markers in all SDR except two showed heterozygote excess. The severe SD in the F(2) population likely biased genetic distances among markers and possibly also marker ordering and could affect QTL mapping of agronomic traits. To reduce the effects of SD and non-fully informative markers, we suggest constructing linkage maps and conducting QTL mapping in advanced generation populations.
植物群体中经常观察到分离失真(SD);其存在会影响作图和育种应用。为了研究二倍体紫花苜蓿(Medicago sativa L.)中 SD 的流行程度,我们开发了两个不相关的分离 F(1)群体和一个 F(2)群体。我们使用 SSR 标记对所有群体进行了基因型分析,并评估了每个群体中每个位点的 SD。这三个图谱与 Medicago truncatula 基因组序列是同源的,并且在很大程度上是共线性的。我们发现 F(1)群体中 24%和 34%的标记存在基因型 SD,F(2)群体中 68%的标记存在基因型 SD;在每个连锁群上都鉴定到了失真标记。F(1)群体中基因型 SD 的比例较小可能是因为它们是非自交的,或者是由于非完全信息标记。对于 F(2)群体,90 个映射标记中有 60 个标记发生了扭曲,并聚类成 8 个分离失真区域(SDR)。在 F(1)群体中鉴定到的大多数 SDR 也在 F(2)群体中鉴定到。基因型 SD 主要是由于合子而不是等位基因的扭曲,这表明合子而不是配子选择是 SD 的主要原因。在 F(2)连锁图谱上,除了两个之外,所有 SDR 中的扭曲标记都表现出杂合子过剩。F(2)群体中严重的 SD 可能会使标记间的遗传距离产生偏差,可能还会影响标记排序,并影响农艺性状的 QTL 作图。为了减少 SD 和非完全信息标记的影响,我们建议在高级世代群体中构建连锁图谱和进行 QTL 作图。