Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Atatürk University, 25240, Erzurum, Turkey.
J Am Dent Assoc. 2011 Jun;142(6):658-65. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2011.0249.
The authors conducted a study to evaluate esthetic restorative materials' color differences after setting and color matching between set materials and a shade guide.
The authors evaluated 13 resin-based composites, one silorane-based composite, two polyacid-modified resin composites and one conventional glass ionomer cement. They measured the color parameters of the samples, which were 8 millimeters in diameter and 1.5 mm in thickness, before and after they were set according to the Commission International de l'Eclairage (CIE) Lab* color scale relative to standard illumination against a white background by means of a dental colorimeter. They also compared the final colors of the restorative materials with a shade guide.
Color difference values for each restorative material ranged from 3.25 to 14.04. With the exception of Fuji IX (GC, Tokyo), Filtek P60 (3M ESPE) and Te-Econom (Ivoclar Vivadent), the restorative materials exhibited a perceptible color change after setting. Color difference values between the set materials and the shade guide tabs ranged from 1.86 to 11.83. With the exception of Filtek Supreme XT (3M ESPE) and Fuji IX, the materials exhibited a perceptible difference.
Most of the materials tested exhibited a significant color change after polymerization and did not match the shade guide tab after undergoing light curing.
作者进行了一项研究,以评估凝固后和凝固材料与比色板之间的颜色匹配的美学修复材料的颜色差异。
作者评估了 13 种树脂基复合材料、1 种硅烷树脂基复合材料、2 种聚酸改性树脂复合材料和 1 种传统玻璃离子水门汀。他们使用牙科比色计,根据国际照明委员会(CIE)Lab*颜色标度,对直径为 8 毫米、厚度为 1.5 毫米的样本进行测量,在白色背景下对样本进行标准照明,记录样本在凝固前后的颜色参数。他们还将修复材料的最终颜色与比色板进行了比较。
每种修复材料的色差值范围为 3.25 至 14.04。除了 Fuji IX(GC,东京)、Filtek P60(3M ESPE)和 Te-Econom(Ivoclar Vivadent)外,其余修复材料在凝固后都表现出明显的颜色变化。凝固材料与比色板标签之间的色差值范围为 1.86 至 11.83。除了 Filtek Supreme XT(3M ESPE)和 Fuji IX 外,其余材料都表现出明显的差异。
大多数测试材料在聚合后都表现出显著的颜色变化,并且在光固化后与比色板标签不匹配。