Suppr超能文献

直接美学修复材料在固化后的颜色差异,并与比色板进行比较。

The color differences of direct esthetic restorative materials after setting and compared with a shade guide.

机构信息

Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Atatürk University, 25240, Erzurum, Turkey.

出版信息

J Am Dent Assoc. 2011 Jun;142(6):658-65. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2011.0249.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The authors conducted a study to evaluate esthetic restorative materials' color differences after setting and color matching between set materials and a shade guide.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The authors evaluated 13 resin-based composites, one silorane-based composite, two polyacid-modified resin composites and one conventional glass ionomer cement. They measured the color parameters of the samples, which were 8 millimeters in diameter and 1.5 mm in thickness, before and after they were set according to the Commission International de l'Eclairage (CIE) Lab* color scale relative to standard illumination against a white background by means of a dental colorimeter. They also compared the final colors of the restorative materials with a shade guide.

RESULTS

Color difference values for each restorative material ranged from 3.25 to 14.04. With the exception of Fuji IX (GC, Tokyo), Filtek P60 (3M ESPE) and Te-Econom (Ivoclar Vivadent), the restorative materials exhibited a perceptible color change after setting. Color difference values between the set materials and the shade guide tabs ranged from 1.86 to 11.83. With the exception of Filtek Supreme XT (3M ESPE) and Fuji IX, the materials exhibited a perceptible difference.

CONCLUSION

Most of the materials tested exhibited a significant color change after polymerization and did not match the shade guide tab after undergoing light curing.

摘要

背景

作者进行了一项研究,以评估凝固后和凝固材料与比色板之间的颜色匹配的美学修复材料的颜色差异。

材料和方法

作者评估了 13 种树脂基复合材料、1 种硅烷树脂基复合材料、2 种聚酸改性树脂复合材料和 1 种传统玻璃离子水门汀。他们使用牙科比色计,根据国际照明委员会(CIE)Lab*颜色标度,对直径为 8 毫米、厚度为 1.5 毫米的样本进行测量,在白色背景下对样本进行标准照明,记录样本在凝固前后的颜色参数。他们还将修复材料的最终颜色与比色板进行了比较。

结果

每种修复材料的色差值范围为 3.25 至 14.04。除了 Fuji IX(GC,东京)、Filtek P60(3M ESPE)和 Te-Econom(Ivoclar Vivadent)外,其余修复材料在凝固后都表现出明显的颜色变化。凝固材料与比色板标签之间的色差值范围为 1.86 至 11.83。除了 Filtek Supreme XT(3M ESPE)和 Fuji IX 外,其余材料都表现出明显的差异。

结论

大多数测试材料在聚合后都表现出显著的颜色变化,并且在光固化后与比色板标签不匹配。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验