Janssens Pim M W, Nap Annemiek W, Bancsi Laszlo F J M M
Department of Clinical Chemistry and Haematology/Semen Bank, Rijnstate, Wagnerlaan 55, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Hum Fertil (Camb). 2011 Jun;14(2):106-14. doi: 10.3109/14647273.2011.577886.
The introduction of legislation in the Netherlands in 2004 enabling donor offspring to identify and make contact with their donors has led to a need to reconsider the number of offspring that an individual semen donor may produce. To this end, we made a survey on the limits for offspring per donor in 29 different countries, distinguishing between systems with anonymous and open-identity sperm donation. We counted donations as individual offspring conceived, or as the number of women/families helped, by a single donor. The interests of the various participants in gamete donation in open-identity and anonymous systems are considered with some of the basic assumptions and interactions between the different parties that might be used to formulate reasonable guidelines. A number of recommendations are made.
2004年荷兰出台的一项立法允许捐赠者的后代识别并与他们的捐赠者取得联系，这使得有必要重新考虑单个精液捐赠者可能生育的后代数量。为此，我们对29个不同国家每个捐赠者的后代数量限制进行了调查，区分了匿名精子捐赠系统和公开身份精子捐赠系统。我们将捐赠计算为单个捐赠者使妇女受孕的后代数量，或其帮助的妇女/家庭数量。本文考虑了公开身份和匿名系统中配子捐赠各方参与者的利益，并探讨了不同参与方之间的一些基本假设和相互作用，这些可用于制定合理的指导方针。我们还提出了一些建议。
