Leyh R G, Kallenbach K, Karck M, Hagl C, Fischer S, Haverich A
Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Hanover Medical School, Hanover, Germany.
Circulation. 2003 Sep 9;108 Suppl 1:II285-90. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000087429.48264.81.
Valve sparing aortic root reimplantation technique in patients with aortic root aneurysm have shown excellent mid-term results. In conjunction with the diameter of the aortic root the mechanical leaflet stress increase, which might have an impact on long-term aortic valve function after valve sparing aortic root reimplantation.
From July 1993 to October 2001, 168 patients with aortic root aneurysm underwent valve sparing aortic root reimplantation. Patients with type A aortic dissection were excluded. Thus, 123 patients were analyzed. We identified 47 patients with an preoperative aortic root diameter exceeding 60 mm (group A), 58 patients with an diameter between 50 and 60 mm (group B), and 18 patients with a diameter less than 50 mm (group C). The groups were compared regarding mortality, long-term survival, freedom from reoperation, freedom from severe and moderate aortic valve insufficiency (AI), and postoperative morbidity. Mean follow-up (group A 43+/-26 months, group B 40+/-25 months, group C 23+/-19 months; group C versus group A, P=0.005; group C versus group B, P=0.011) was shorter in group C. Perioperative mortality (group A 2.2%, group B 1.9%, group C 5.2%; P=ns) was comparable between the groups with each one patient. The 3-year survival for group A was 98+/-2%, for group B 96+/-3%, and for group C 100+/-0% (P=ns). Freedom from reoperation for group A was 98+/-2%, for group B 96+/-3%, and for group C 88+/-8% (P=ns). Four patients developed severe or moderate AI, thus freedom from severe and moderate AI for group A was 100+/-0%, for group B 88+/-8%, and for group C 94+/-5% (P=ns). During follow-up no thromboembolic or bleeding events were noticed.
Our data show that the preoperative diameter of the aortic root has no impact on the longevity of the repair. Thus, the reimplantation technique can be recommended for all patients presenting with an aortic root aneurysm and normal leaflets regardless of the aortic root diameter.
保留瓣膜的主动脉根部再植入技术应用于主动脉根部瘤患者已显示出良好的中期效果。随着主动脉根部直径增加,机械瓣叶应力会升高,这可能会对保留瓣膜的主动脉根部再植入术后的长期主动脉瓣功能产生影响。
1993年7月至2001年10月,168例主动脉根部瘤患者接受了保留瓣膜的主动脉根部再植入术。排除A型主动脉夹层患者。因此,对123例患者进行了分析。我们将47例术前主动脉根部直径超过60mm的患者分为A组,58例直径在50至60mm之间的患者分为B组,18例直径小于50mm的患者分为C组。比较了三组在死亡率、长期生存率、免于再次手术、免于严重和中度主动脉瓣关闭不全(AI)以及术后发病率方面的情况。C组的平均随访时间(A组43±26个月,B组40±25个月,C组23±19个月;C组与A组比较,P = 0.005;C组与B组比较,P = 0.011)较短。围手术期死亡率(A组2.2%,B组1.9%,C组5.2%;P = 无显著性差异)在每组各有1例患者的情况下,三组之间具有可比性。A组的3年生存率为98±2%,B组为96±3%,C组为100±0%(P = 无显著性差异)。A组免于再次手术的比例为98±2%,B组为96±3%,C组为88±8%(P = 无显著性差异)。4例患者出现严重或中度AI,因此A组免于严重和中度AI的比例为100±0%,B组为88±8%,C组为94±5%(P = 无显著性差异)。随访期间未发现血栓栓塞或出血事件。
我们的数据表明,主动脉根部的术前直径对修复的长期效果没有影响。因此,无论主动脉根部直径如何,对于所有患有主动脉根部瘤且瓣叶正常的患者,均可推荐采用再植入技术。