• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用技术改进 STEM 学生观念的形成性评估:建立国家网络。

Harnessing technology to improve formative assessment of student conceptions in STEM: forging a national network.

机构信息

Division of Science and Mathematics Education, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.

出版信息

CBE Life Sci Educ. 2011 Summer;10(2):149-55. doi: 10.1187/cbe.11-03-0019.

DOI:10.1187/cbe.11-03-0019
PMID:21633063
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3105921/
Abstract

Concept inventories, consisting of multiple-choice questions designed around common student misconceptions, are designed to reveal student thinking. However, students often have complex, heterogeneous ideas about scientific concepts. Constructed-response assessments, in which students must create their own answer, may better reveal students' thinking, but are time- and resource-intensive to evaluate. This report describes the initial meeting of a National Science Foundation-funded cross-institutional collaboration of interdisciplinary science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education researchers interested in exploring the use of automated text analysis to evaluate constructed-response assessments. Participants at the meeting shared existing work on lexical analysis and concept inventories, participated in technology demonstrations and workshops, and discussed research goals. We are seeking interested collaborators to join our research community.

摘要

概念清单由围绕常见学生误解设计的多项选择题组成,旨在揭示学生的思维。然而,学生对科学概念往往有复杂、多样的想法。在需要学生自己创造答案的建构反应评估中,可能会更好地揭示学生的思维,但评估起来既费时又费资源。本报告描述了一个由美国国家科学基金会资助的跨机构合作的初步会议,该合作由对探索使用自动化文本分析来评估建构反应评估感兴趣的跨学科科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)教育研究人员组成。会议参与者分享了关于词汇分析和概念清单的现有工作,参加了技术演示和研讨会,并讨论了研究目标。我们正在寻找有兴趣的合作者加入我们的研究社区。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18b9/3105921/e361d5faae42/149fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18b9/3105921/e361d5faae42/149fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18b9/3105921/e361d5faae42/149fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Harnessing technology to improve formative assessment of student conceptions in STEM: forging a national network.利用技术改进 STEM 学生观念的形成性评估:建立国家网络。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2011 Summer;10(2):149-55. doi: 10.1187/cbe.11-03-0019.
2
CREATE cornerstone: introduction to scientific thinking, a new course for STEM-interested freshmen, demystifies scientific thinking through analysis of scientific literature.创建基石:科学思维导论,一门面向对 STEM 感兴趣的新生的新课程,通过分析科学文献来揭开科学思维的神秘面纱。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2013 Spring;12(1):59-72. doi: 10.1187/cbe.12-11-0201.
3
Science education. Increasing persistence of college students in STEM.科学教育。提高大学生在 STEM 领域的坚持度。
Science. 2013 Sep 27;341(6153):1455-6. doi: 10.1126/science.1240487.
4
Connected While Distant: Networking CUREs Across Classrooms to Create Community and Empower Students.远程相联:通过联网将 CUREs 拓展至不同课堂,以构建社区并赋能学生。
Integr Comp Biol. 2021 Oct 4;61(3):934-943. doi: 10.1093/icb/icab146.
5
Developmental science concepts guide effective support of underrepresented STEM students.发展科学概念指导对代表性不足的STEM学生的有效支持。
Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2019 Sep;47(5):506-512. doi: 10.1002/bmb.21292. Epub 2019 Aug 24.
6
Breaking Down Silos Working Meeting: An Approach to Fostering Cross-Disciplinary STEM-DBER Collaborations through Working Meetings.打破壁垒专题工作会议:通过专题工作会议促进跨学科 STEM-DBER 合作的方法。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2019 Sep;18(3):mr3. doi: 10.1187/cbe.19-03-0064.
7
Is it the intervention or the students? using linear regression to control for student characteristics in undergraduate STEM education research.是干预还是学生?在本科 STEM 教育研究中使用线性回归控制学生特征。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2014 Spring;13(1):41-8. doi: 10.1187/cbe-13-07-0136.
8
An exploration of the relationship between active learning and student motivation in STEM: a mixed methods study.主动学习与 STEM 学生动机关系的探索:混合方法研究。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2024 Sep 1;48(3):621-638. doi: 10.1152/advan.00247.2022. Epub 2024 Jun 27.
9
Improving Underrepresented Minority Student Persistence in STEM.提高少数族裔学生在STEM领域的留存率。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2016 fall;15(3). doi: 10.1187/cbe.16-01-0038.
10
Fine-Tuning Summer Research Programs to Promote Underrepresented Students' Persistence in the STEM Pathway.优化暑期研究项目以促进未被充分代表的学生在STEM领域的持续发展。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2016 Fall;15(3). doi: 10.1187/cbe.16-01-0046.

引用本文的文献

1
Paired Multiple-Choice Questions Reveal Students' Incomplete Statistical Thinking about Variation during Data Analysis.配对选择题揭示了学生在数据分析过程中对变异的不完整统计思维。
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2021 May 31;22(2). doi: 10.1128/jmbe.00112-21. eCollection 2021 Fall.
2
Development of the Biological Variation In Experimental Design And Analysis (BioVEDA) assessment.生物实验设计与分析(BioVEDA)评估的发展。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 20;15(7):e0236098. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236098. eCollection 2020.
3
Through the Eyes of Faculty: Using Personas as a Tool for Learner-Centered Professional Development.

本文引用的文献

1
The Genetics Concept Assessment: a new concept inventory for gauging student understanding of genetics.《遗传学概念评估》:一种用于衡量学生对遗传学理解的新概念量表。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2008 Winter;7(4):422-30. doi: 10.1187/cbe.08-08-0045.
2
Assessing students' ability to trace matter in dynamic systems in cell biology.评估学生追踪细胞生物学动态系统中物质的能力。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2006 Winter;5(4):323-31. doi: 10.1187/cbe.06-02-0142.
从教师视角出发:以人物角色为工具,推动以学习者为中心的专业发展。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2019 Dec;18(4):ar62. doi: 10.1187/cbe.19-06-0114.
4
Characterizing Students' Ideas about the Effects of a Mutation in a Noncoding Region of DNA.描述学生对 DNA 非编码区域中突变的影响的想法。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2019 Jun;18(2):ar18. doi: 10.1187/cbe.18-09-0173.
5
EcoEvo-MAPS: An Ecology and Evolution Assessment for Introductory through Advanced Undergraduates.生态进化地图集:适用于本科入门到高级阶段的生态学和进化学评估。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2018 Jun;17(2):ar18. doi: 10.1187/cbe.17-02-0037.
6
A Faculty Professional Development Model That Improves Student Learning, Encourages Active-Learning Instructional Practices, and Works for Faculty at Multiple Institutions.一种能够提高学生学习效果、鼓励主动学习教学实践且适用于多所院校教师的教师专业发展模式。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2018 Jun;17(2):es5. doi: 10.1187/cbe.17-12-0260.
7
What Motivates Biology Instructors to Engage and Persist in Teaching Professional Development?什么激励生物学教师参与并坚持教学专业发展?
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2017 Fall;16(3). doi: 10.1187/cbe.16-08-0241.
8
Small Changes: Using Assessment to Direct Instructional Practices in Large-Enrollment Biochemistry Courses.小改变:利用评估指导大规模生物化学课程的教学实践。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2017 Spring;16(1). doi: 10.1187/cbe.16-06-0191.
9
Teaching Genetics: Past, Present, and Future.遗传学教学:过去、现在与未来
Genetics. 2016 Sep;204(1):5-10. doi: 10.1534/genetics.116.187138.
10
What are they thinking? Automated analysis of student writing about acid-base chemistry in introductory biology.他们在想什么?关于基础生物学中酸碱化学的学生写作的自动化分析。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2012 Fall;11(3):283-93. doi: 10.1187/cbe.11-08-0084.