• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

学前和学龄儿童皮亚杰守恒数量任务的功能磁共振成像研究:新皮亚杰方法。

Functional magnetic resonance imaging study of Piaget's conservation-of-number task in preschool and school-age children: a neo-Piagetian approach.

机构信息

Centre for Imaging Neurosciences and Applications to PathologieS (CI-NAPS), CNRS, Universities of Caen and Paris Descartes (Alliance for Higher Education and Research Sorbonne Paris Cité), 75005 Paris, France.

出版信息

J Exp Child Psychol. 2011 Nov;110(3):332-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2011.04.008. Epub 2011 Jun 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.jecp.2011.04.008
PMID:21636095
Abstract

Jean Piaget's theory is a central reference point in the study of logico-mathematical development in children. One of the most famous Piagetian tasks is number conservation. Failures and successes in this task reveal two fundamental stages in children's thinking and judgment, shifting at approximately 7 years of age from visuospatial intuition to number conservation. In the current study, preschool children (nonconservers, 5-6 years of age) and school-age children (conservers, 9-10 years of age) were presented with Piaget's conservation-of-number task and monitored by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). The cognitive change allowing children to access conservation was shown to be related to the neural contribution of a bilateral parietofrontal network involved in numerical and executive functions. These fMRI results highlight how the behavioral and cognitive stages Piaget formulated during the 20th century manifest in the brain with age.

摘要

让·皮亚杰的理论是儿童数理逻辑发展研究的一个重要参考点。最著名的皮亚杰任务之一是数量守恒。在这项任务中的失败和成功揭示了儿童思维和判断的两个基本阶段,大约在 7 岁时从视觉空间直觉转变为数量守恒。在当前的研究中,学前儿童(非守恒者,5-6 岁)和学龄儿童(守恒者,9-10 岁)接受了皮亚杰的数量守恒任务,并通过功能磁共振成像(fMRI)进行监测。证明使儿童能够获得守恒的认知变化与涉及数字和执行功能的双侧顶叶-额叶网络的神经贡献有关。这些 fMRI 结果强调了 20 世纪皮亚杰制定的行为和认知阶段如何随着年龄的增长在大脑中表现出来。

相似文献

1
Functional magnetic resonance imaging study of Piaget's conservation-of-number task in preschool and school-age children: a neo-Piagetian approach.学前和学龄儿童皮亚杰守恒数量任务的功能磁共振成像研究:新皮亚杰方法。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2011 Nov;110(3):332-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2011.04.008. Epub 2011 Jun 1.
2
Ethical views and considerations.伦理观点和考虑因素。
Handb Clin Neurol. 2020;173:15-21. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64150-2.00003-4.
3
[Cognitive functions, their development and modern diagnostic methods].[认知功能、其发展及现代诊断方法]
Przegl Lek. 2006;63 Suppl 1:29-34.
4
Cross-cultural investigations.跨文化调查。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1996;61(1-2):131-55.
5
Mapping numerical processing, reading, and executive functions in the developing brain: an fMRI meta-analysis of 52 studies including 842 children.在发展中的大脑中映射数字处理、阅读和执行功能:一项包含 842 名儿童的 52 项研究的 fMRI 元分析。
Dev Sci. 2010 Nov;13(6):876-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00938.x.
6
Incorporating Piaget's theories into behavior management techniques for the child dental patient.将皮亚杰的理论融入儿童牙科患者的行为管理技巧中。
Gen Dent. 2000 Jan-Feb;48(1):74-6.
7
Adult brains don't fully overcome biases that lead to incorrect performance during cognitive development: an fMRI study in young adults completing a Piaget-like task.一项针对完成类似皮亚杰任务的年轻人的功能磁共振成像研究表明,成人大脑无法完全克服在认知发展过程中导致错误表现的偏差。
Dev Sci. 2009 Mar;12(2):326-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00785.x.
8
The foundation of Piaget's theories: mental and physical action.皮亚杰理论的基础:心理和身体行为。
Adv Child Dev Behav. 1999;27:221-46. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2407(08)60140-8.
9
Scalp topography of event-related brain potentials and cognitive transition during childhood.儿童期事件相关脑电位的头皮地形图与认知转变
Child Dev. 1993 Jun;64(3):769-88.
10
Cognitive abilities of preschool children: implications for nurses working with young children.学龄前儿童的认知能力:对从事幼儿护理工作的护士的启示。
J Pediatr Nurs. 1991 Aug;6(4):230-5.

引用本文的文献

1
How learning influences non-symbolic numerical processing: effects of feedback in the dot comparison task.学习如何影响非符号数字处理:点比较任务中的反馈效应。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jan 30;14:1287429. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1287429. eCollection 2023.
2
Draw me a brain: The use of drawing as a tool to examine children's developing knowledge about the "black box".为我画一个大脑:将绘画作为一种工具来考察儿童对“黑匣子”的认知发展。
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 13;13:951784. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.951784. eCollection 2022.
3
Persistence of the "Moving Things Are Alive" Heuristic into Adulthood: Evidence from EEG.
成年后“动的东西就是活的”启发式的持续存在:来自 EEG 的证据。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2021 Sep;20(3):ar45. doi: 10.1187/cbe.19-11-0244.
4
Investigating the Dimensionality of Early Numeracy Using the Bifactor Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling Framework.使用双因素探索性结构方程建模框架研究早期算术能力的维度
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 22;12:680124. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.680124. eCollection 2021.
5
Inhibiting the Whole Number Bias in a Fraction Comparison Task: An Event-Related Potential Study.抑制分数比较任务中的整数偏差:一项事件相关电位研究。
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2020 Mar 6;13:245-255. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S240263. eCollection 2020.
6
Evidence for a visuospatial bias in decimal number comparison in adolescents and in adults.证据表明,青少年和成年人在十进制数比较中存在视空间偏向。
Sci Rep. 2019 Oct 14;9(1):14770. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-51392-6.
7
Inhibitory control and decimal number comparison in school-aged children.学龄儿童的抑制控制与十进制数字比较
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 20;12(11):e0188276. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188276. eCollection 2017.
8
Neural Correlates of Reward Processing in Typical and Atypical Development.典型与非典型发育中奖励处理的神经关联
Child Neurol Open. 2016 Sep 15;3:2329048X16667350. doi: 10.1177/2329048X16667350. eCollection 2016 Jan-Dec.
9
Embodied Action Improves Cognition in Children: Evidence from a Study Based on Piagetian Conservation Tasks.具身行动改善儿童认知:基于皮亚杰守恒任务的一项研究证据
Front Psychol. 2016 Mar 21;7:393. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00393. eCollection 2016.
10
Evidence for an inhibitory-control theory of the reasoning brain.推理大脑的抑制控制理论的证据。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Mar 23;9:148. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00148. eCollection 2015.