• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

股血管闭合装置在 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的安全性和有效性。

Safety and efficacy of femoral vascular closure devices in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

机构信息

Interventional Cardiology Unit, Department of Cardiology, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 2011 Jun;161(6):1207-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.03.009. Epub 2011 May 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.ahj.2011.03.009
PMID:21641370
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The use of vascular closure devices (VCDs) for the reduction of access site complications following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains controversial. Patients undergoing primary PCI for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are at high risk of femoral artery complications. A lack of information exists regarding the use of VCDs in this group of patients because they have been routinely excluded from randomized trials. This study sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the routine use of VCDs after primary PCI.

METHODS

A total of 558 consecutive patients undergoing primary PCI for STEMI via femoral route were studied for in-hospital outcomes through a prospective registry from January 2003 to December 2008. The primary end point was the presence of major vascular complication (MVC) defined as a composite of fatal access site bleeding, access site complication requiring interventional or surgical correction, or access site bleeding with ≥3 g/dL drop in hemoglobin or requiring blood transfusion.

RESULTS

Of the total patients, 464 (83.2%) received a VCD; and manual compression was used in 94 patients (16.8%). Major vascular complication occurred in 5.2% of patients. The risk of MVC was significantly lower with VCDs compared with manual compression (4.3% vs 9.6%, P = .036). Multivariable logistic regression analysis determined that VCD use remained an independent predictor of lower rate of MVC (odds ratio 0.38, 95% CI 0.17-0.91).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of VCDs in patients undergoing primary PCI for STEMI is safe and is associated with lower rates of MVC compared with manual compression.

摘要

背景

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后使用血管闭合装置(VCD)减少介入部位并发症仍存在争议。接受急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)的患者行直接 PCI 术时,股动脉并发症风险较高。由于这些患者通常被排除在随机试验之外,因此缺乏关于使用 VCD 的信息。本研究旨在评估直接 PCI 术后常规使用 VCD 的安全性和疗效。

方法

2003 年 1 月至 2008 年 12 月,通过前瞻性登记研究,对 558 例连续接受股动脉途径直接 PCI 术治疗的 STEMI 患者进行了住院期间结局评估。主要终点是主要血管并发症(MVC)的发生,定义为致命性入路部位出血、需要介入或手术矫正的入路部位并发症或血红蛋白下降≥3 g/dL 并需要输血的入路部位出血的复合终点。

结果

在所有患者中,464 例(83.2%)接受了 VCD,94 例(16.8%)采用了手动压迫。5.2%的患者发生主要血管并发症。与手动压迫相比,VCD 降低 MVC 的风险显著(4.3%比 9.6%,P=0.036)。多变量逻辑回归分析确定,VCD 使用仍然是 MVC 发生率较低的独立预测因素(比值比 0.38,95%置信区间 0.17-0.91)。

结论

在接受直接 PCI 术治疗的 STEMI 患者中,使用 VCD 是安全的,与手动压迫相比,VCD 可降低 MVC 的发生率。

相似文献

1
Safety and efficacy of femoral vascular closure devices in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction.股血管闭合装置在 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的安全性和有效性。
Am Heart J. 2011 Jun;161(6):1207-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.03.009. Epub 2011 May 11.
2
Closure device or manual compression in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized comparison.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者使用闭合装置或手动压迫的随机对照比较
J Invasive Cardiol. 2010 Dec;22(12):562-6.
3
Vascular closure devices: is the case closed?
J Invasive Cardiol. 2010 Dec;22(12):568-70.
4
Radial vs femoral approach with StarClose clip placement for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. RADIAMI II: a prospective, randomised, single centre trial.桡动脉入路与 StarClose 夹放置在 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的比较。RADIAMI II:一项前瞻性、随机、单中心试验。
Kardiol Pol. 2011;69(8):763-71.
5
Bleeding and vascular complications at the femoral access site following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI): an evaluation of hemostasis strategies.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后股动脉穿刺部位的出血和血管并发症:止血策略的评估
J Invasive Cardiol. 2012 Jul;24(7):328-34.
6
Effects of pretreatment with clopidogrel on nonemergent percutaneous coronary intervention after fibrinolytic administration for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a Clopidogrel as Adjunctive Reperfusion Therapy-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (CLARITY-TIMI) 28 study.氯吡格雷预处理对ST段抬高型心肌梗死溶栓治疗后非急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的影响:氯吡格雷作为辅助再灌注治疗-心肌梗死溶栓(CLARITY-TIMI)28研究。
Am Heart J. 2008 Jan;155(1):133-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.08.034. Epub 2007 Nov 19.
7
Routine thrombectomy in percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: a randomized, controlled trial.急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的常规血栓切除术:一项随机对照试验。
Circulation. 2006 Jul 4;114(1):40-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.595660. Epub 2006 Jun 26.
8
Early discharge is feasible following primary percutaneous coronary intervention with transradial stent implantation under platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockade. Results of the AGGRASTENT Trial.在血小板糖蛋白IIb/IIIa受体阻滞剂作用下经桡动脉支架植入进行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后早期出院是可行的。AGGRASTENT试验结果
J Invasive Cardiol. 2005 Oct;17(10):512-7.
9
Clinical benefits of adjunctive tirofiban therapy in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.替罗非班辅助治疗对接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的临床益处。
Coron Artery Dis. 2008 Jun;19(4):271-7. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0b013e3282f487e0.
10
Primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: changing patterns of vascular access, radial versus femoral artery.急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死的直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:血管入路的变化模式,桡动脉与股动脉对比
Heart. 2009 Oct;95(19):1612-8. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2009.170233. Epub 2009 Jul 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Feasibility and clinical benefits of the double-ProGlide technique for hemostasis after cryoballoon atrial fibrillation ablation with uninterrupted oral anticoagulants.双ProGlide技术用于在不间断口服抗凝剂治疗的冷冻球囊房颤消融术后止血的可行性及临床益处。
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2023 Apr 28;20(4):268-275. doi: 10.26599/1671-5411.2023.04.004.
2
Restrictive and liberal red cell transfusion strategies in adult patients: reconciling clinical data with best practice.成年患者的限制性与宽松性红细胞输注策略:使临床数据与最佳实践相协调
Crit Care. 2015 May 5;19(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0912-y.
3
Access and hemostasis: femoral and popliteal approaches and closure devices-why, what, when, and how?
入路与止血:股动脉和腘动脉入路及闭合装置——为何、是什么、何时以及如何?
Semin Intervent Radiol. 2014 Dec;31(4):353-60. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1393972.
4
Comparison of the performance of the CRUSADE, ACUITY-HORIZONS, and ACTION bleeding risk scores in STEMI undergoing primary PCI: insights from a cohort of 1391 patients.比较 CRUSADE、ACUITY-HORIZONS 和 ACTION 出血风险评分在 STEMI 患者行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的表现:来自 1391 例患者队列的研究结果。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2013 Mar;2(1):19-26. doi: 10.1177/2048872612469885.