• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于群体选择的 8 个批评意见。

Eight criticisms not to make about group selection.

机构信息

Center for Insect Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA.

出版信息

Evolution. 2011 Jun;65(6):1523-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01290.x. Epub 2011 Apr 3.

DOI:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01290.x
PMID:21644945
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3110649/
Abstract

Group selection, which was once widely rejected as a significant evolutionary force, is now accepted by all who seriously study the subject. There is still widespread confusion about group selection, however, not only among students and the general public, but among professional evolutionists who do not directly study the subject. We list eight criticisms that are frequently invoked against group selection, which can be permanently laid to rest based upon current knowledge. Experts will always find something to critique about group selection, as for any important subject, but these eight criticisms are not among them. Laying them to rest will enable authors to openly use the term group selection without being handicapped during the review process.

摘要

群体选择曾一度被广泛否定,认为其不是一种重要的进化力量,但现在所有认真研究这个课题的人都接受了这一观点。然而,对于群体选择,人们仍然存在广泛的困惑,不仅是学生和公众,甚至包括那些没有直接研究这个课题的专业进化生物学家。我们列出了八项经常被用来反对群体选择的批评意见,这些意见现在都可以根据现有知识得到永久性的解决。对于任何一个重要的课题,专家们总会发现一些可以批评的地方,但这八项批评并不在其中。解决这些批评意见将使作者能够在不影响评审过程的情况下,公开使用“群体选择”一词。

相似文献

1
Eight criticisms not to make about group selection.关于群体选择的 8 个批评意见。
Evolution. 2011 Jun;65(6):1523-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01290.x. Epub 2011 Apr 3.
2
Kin selection is the key to altruism.亲缘选择是利他行为的关键。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2006 Feb;21(2):57-60. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2005.11.020. Epub 2005 Dec 20.
3
Interacting phenotypes and the evolutionary process. III. Social evolution.相互作用的表型和进化过程。III. 社会进化。
Evolution. 2010 Sep;64(9):2558-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01012.x.
4
Group selection, altruism, reinforcement, and throwing in human evolution.群体选择、利他主义、强化以及人类进化中的投掷行为。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Sep;72(9):3748-52. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.9.3748.
5
Rationality and social behavior.理性与社会行为。
J Theor Biol. 2003 Oct 21;224(4):469-78. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(03)00194-2.
6
Joint evolution of multiple social traits: a kin selection analysis.多个社会特征的共同进化:亲缘选择分析。
Proc Biol Sci. 2010 Feb 7;277(1680):415-22. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.1480. Epub 2009 Oct 14.
7
Altruism researchers must cooperate.利他主义研究者必须合作。
Nature. 2010 Oct 7;467(7316):653-5. doi: 10.1038/467653a.
8
Altruism and fairness: Unnatural selection?利他主义和公平:非自然选择?
C R Biol. 2010 Feb;333(2):174-80. doi: 10.1016/j.crvi.2009.12.005. Epub 2010 Feb 10.
9
Origins of altruism diversity I: The diverse ecological roles of altruistic strategies and their evolutionary responses to local competition.利他主义多样性的起源 I:利他策略的多样化生态角色及其对局部竞争的进化反应。
Evolution. 2012 Aug;66(8):2484-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01630.x. Epub 2012 Apr 16.
10
Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence.文化群体选择在解释人类合作方面起着至关重要的作用:证据概述。
Behav Brain Sci. 2016 Jan;39:e30. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X1400106X. Epub 2014 Oct 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Evolutionary Implications of Self-Assembling Cybernetic Materials with Collective Problem-Solving Intelligence at Multiple Scales.具有多尺度集体问题解决智能的自组装控制论材料的进化意义。
Entropy (Basel). 2024 Jun 21;26(7):532. doi: 10.3390/e26070532.
2
Hierarchically embedded interaction networks represent a missing link in the study of behavioral and community ecology.分层嵌入的交互网络代表了行为生态学和群落生态学研究中缺失的环节。
Behav Ecol. 2020 Mar-Apr;31(2):279-286. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arz168. Epub 2019 Oct 11.
3
Hypotheses for the Evolution of Reduced Reactive Aggression in the Context of Human Self-Domestication.人类自我驯化背景下反应性攻击行为减少的进化假说。
Front Psychol. 2019 Aug 20;10:1914. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01914. eCollection 2019.
4
Hypocrisy and Corruption: How Disparities in Power Shape the Evolution of Social Control.虚伪与腐败:权力差异如何塑造社会控制的演变
Evol Psychol. 2018 Apr-Jun;16(2):1474704918756993. doi: 10.1177/1474704918756993.
5
Faith, Fact, and Behaviorism.信仰、事实与行为主义。
Behav Anal. 2013 Fall;36(2):229-238. doi: 10.1007/BF03392309.
6
Dopamine D4 receptor gene and religious affiliation correlate with dictator game altruism in males and not females: evidence for gender-sensitive gene × culture interaction.多巴胺D4受体基因与宗教信仰和男性而非女性的独裁者博弈利他行为相关:性别敏感的基因×文化相互作用的证据。
Front Neurosci. 2015 Sep 24;9:338. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2015.00338. eCollection 2015.
7
Pruitt & Goodnight reply.普鲁伊特和古德奈特回复。
Nature. 2015 Aug 27;524(7566):E4-5. doi: 10.1038/nature14597.
8
Questioning evidence of group selection in spiders.对蜘蛛群体选择证据的质疑。
Nature. 2015 Aug 27;524(7566):E1-3. doi: 10.1038/nature14595.
9
Evolution, epigenetics and cooperation.进化、表观遗传学与合作。
J Biosci. 2014 Apr;39(2):191-200. doi: 10.1007/s12038-013-9342-7.
10
Availability of public goods shapes the evolution of competing metabolic strategies.公共物品的可获得性塑造了竞争代谢策略的进化。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Aug 27;110(35):14302-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1308523110. Epub 2013 Aug 12.

本文引用的文献

1
The role of multilevel selection in the evolution of sexual conflict in the water strider aquarius remigis.多水平选择在 Aquarius remigis 水黾性冲突进化中的作用。
Evolution. 2010 Nov;64(11):3183-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01087.x.
2
Population structure mediates sexual conflict in water striders.种群结构调节水黾的性冲突。
Science. 2009 Nov 6;326(5954):816. doi: 10.1126/science.1180183.
3
Did Darwin write the Origin backwards?达尔文是倒着写《物种起源》的吗?
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jun 16;106 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):10048-55. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0901109106. Epub 2009 Jun 15.
4
Darwin 200: The needs of the many.达尔文200:多数人的需求。
Nature. 2008 Nov 20;456(7220):296-9. doi: 10.1038/456296a.
5
Experimental studies of group selection: what do they tell us about group selection in nature?群体选择的实验研究:它们能告诉我们关于自然界中群体选择的哪些信息?
Am Nat. 1997 Jul;150 Suppl 1:S59-79. doi: 10.1086/286050.
6
A mechanism for the evolution of altruism among nonkin: positive assortment through environmental feedback.非亲属间利他行为的一种进化机制:通过环境反馈实现正向分类。
Am Nat. 2002 Aug;160(2):205-13. doi: 10.1086/341018.
7
Rethinking the theoretical foundation of sociobiology.重新思考社会生物学的理论基础。
Q Rev Biol. 2007 Dec;82(4):327-48. doi: 10.1086/522809.
8
Simple models of assortment through environmental feedback.通过环境反馈进行分类的简单模型。
Artif Life. 2007 Winter;13(1):1-9. doi: 10.1162/artl.2007.13.1.1.
9
Local migration promotes competitive restraint in a host-pathogen 'tragedy of the commons'.局部迁移在宿主-病原体“公地悲剧”中促进竞争抑制。
Nature. 2006 Jul 6;442(7098):75-8. doi: 10.1038/nature04864.
10
Know when to walk away: contingent movement and the evolution of cooperation.知道何时离开:偶然运动与合作的演变
J Theor Biol. 2004 Nov 21;231(2):249-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2004.06.020.