Suppr超能文献

关于群体选择的 8 个批评意见。

Eight criticisms not to make about group selection.

机构信息

Center for Insect Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA.

出版信息

Evolution. 2011 Jun;65(6):1523-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01290.x. Epub 2011 Apr 3.

Abstract

Group selection, which was once widely rejected as a significant evolutionary force, is now accepted by all who seriously study the subject. There is still widespread confusion about group selection, however, not only among students and the general public, but among professional evolutionists who do not directly study the subject. We list eight criticisms that are frequently invoked against group selection, which can be permanently laid to rest based upon current knowledge. Experts will always find something to critique about group selection, as for any important subject, but these eight criticisms are not among them. Laying them to rest will enable authors to openly use the term group selection without being handicapped during the review process.

摘要

群体选择曾一度被广泛否定,认为其不是一种重要的进化力量,但现在所有认真研究这个课题的人都接受了这一观点。然而,对于群体选择,人们仍然存在广泛的困惑,不仅是学生和公众,甚至包括那些没有直接研究这个课题的专业进化生物学家。我们列出了八项经常被用来反对群体选择的批评意见,这些意见现在都可以根据现有知识得到永久性的解决。对于任何一个重要的课题,专家们总会发现一些可以批评的地方,但这八项批评并不在其中。解决这些批评意见将使作者能够在不影响评审过程的情况下,公开使用“群体选择”一词。

相似文献

1
Eight criticisms not to make about group selection.关于群体选择的 8 个批评意见。
Evolution. 2011 Jun;65(6):1523-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01290.x. Epub 2011 Apr 3.
2
Kin selection is the key to altruism.亲缘选择是利他行为的关键。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2006 Feb;21(2):57-60. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2005.11.020. Epub 2005 Dec 20.
5
Rationality and social behavior.理性与社会行为。
J Theor Biol. 2003 Oct 21;224(4):469-78. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(03)00194-2.
6
Joint evolution of multiple social traits: a kin selection analysis.多个社会特征的共同进化:亲缘选择分析。
Proc Biol Sci. 2010 Feb 7;277(1680):415-22. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.1480. Epub 2009 Oct 14.
7
Altruism researchers must cooperate.利他主义研究者必须合作。
Nature. 2010 Oct 7;467(7316):653-5. doi: 10.1038/467653a.
8
Altruism and fairness: Unnatural selection?利他主义和公平:非自然选择?
C R Biol. 2010 Feb;333(2):174-80. doi: 10.1016/j.crvi.2009.12.005. Epub 2010 Feb 10.

引用本文的文献

5
Faith, Fact, and Behaviorism.信仰、事实与行为主义。
Behav Anal. 2013 Fall;36(2):229-238. doi: 10.1007/BF03392309.
7
Pruitt & Goodnight reply.普鲁伊特和古德奈特回复。
Nature. 2015 Aug 27;524(7566):E4-5. doi: 10.1038/nature14597.
8
Questioning evidence of group selection in spiders.对蜘蛛群体选择证据的质疑。
Nature. 2015 Aug 27;524(7566):E1-3. doi: 10.1038/nature14595.
9
Evolution, epigenetics and cooperation.进化、表观遗传学与合作。
J Biosci. 2014 Apr;39(2):191-200. doi: 10.1007/s12038-013-9342-7.
10
Availability of public goods shapes the evolution of competing metabolic strategies.公共物品的可获得性塑造了竞争代谢策略的进化。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Aug 27;110(35):14302-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1308523110. Epub 2013 Aug 12.

本文引用的文献

3
Did Darwin write the Origin backwards?达尔文是倒着写《物种起源》的吗?
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jun 16;106 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):10048-55. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0901109106. Epub 2009 Jun 15.
4
Darwin 200: The needs of the many.达尔文200:多数人的需求。
Nature. 2008 Nov 20;456(7220):296-9. doi: 10.1038/456296a.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验