Division of Cardiology, Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC 20010, USA.
EuroIntervention. 2011 Jun;7(2):225-33. doi: 10.4244/EIJV7I2A37.
Fractional flow reserve (FFR) of <0.8 or 0.75 is currently used to guide revascularisation in lesions with intermediate coronary stenosis. We assessed whether there is an intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) measurement that can reliably be used to predict when patients should undergo intervention.
The analysis included 92 intermediate lesions (84 patients) located in vessel diameters >2.5 mm. Positive FFR was considered present at <0.8 and 0.75. IVUS minimum lumen area (MLA) was correlated to the FFR findings in intermediate lesions with 40-70% stenosis. The mean FFR value was 0.89 ± 0.08. Twenty-four patients (26.1%) had FFR <0.8; 17 (18.5%) <0.75. Positive correlations between FFR and IVUS measurements included MLA (r = 0.34, p<0.001), minimum lumen diameter (MLD) (r=0.31, p=0.004), lesion length (r=-0.5, p<0.001), and area stenosis (r=-0.31, p=0.01). There was no significant correlation between FFR and quantitative coronary angiography in MLD (r=0.19, p=0.06), diameter stenosis (r=0.08, p=0.4), or lesion length (r=-0.14, p=0.17). A receiver operating characteristic curve identified MLA <2.8 mm2 (sensitivity 79.7%, specificity 80.3%) as the best threshold value for FFR <0.75; and MLA <3.2 mm2 as best for FFR <0.8 (sensitivity 69.2%, specificity 68.3%).
Anatomic measurements of intermediate coronary lesions obtained by IVUS show a moderate correlation to FFR values, although they differ according to vessel size. IVUS MLA may be used as an alternative to FFR when assessing the need for intervention in intermediate coronary lesion. Vessel size, however, should always be taken into account.
目前,分数血流储备(FFR)<0.8 或 0.75 用于指导有中度冠状动脉狭窄的病变血运重建。我们评估是否存在一种血管内超声(IVUS)测量方法,可以可靠地预测患者何时需要进行介入治疗。
该分析包括 92 个位于直径>2.5mm 的血管中的中度狭窄病变(84 例患者)。FFR<0.8 和 0.75 时被认为存在阳性 FFR。IVUS 最小管腔面积(MLA)与 40-70%狭窄的中度病变的 FFR 结果相关。平均 FFR 值为 0.89±0.08。24 例(26.1%)FFR<0.8;17 例(18.5%)FFR<0.75。FFR 与 IVUS 测量值之间存在正相关,包括 MLA(r=0.34,p<0.001)、最小管腔直径(MLD)(r=0.31,p=0.004)、病变长度(r=-0.5,p<0.001)和面积狭窄(r=-0.31,p=0.01)。FFR 与 MLD 的定量冠状动脉造影(r=0.19,p=0.06)、直径狭窄(r=0.08,p=0.4)或病变长度(r=-0.14,p=0.17)无显著相关性。ROC 曲线确定 MLA<2.8mm2(敏感度 79.7%,特异性 80.3%)为 FFR<0.75 的最佳阈值值;MLA<3.2mm2 为 FFR<0.8 的最佳阈值值(敏感度 69.2%,特异性 68.3%)。
IVUS 获得的中度冠状动脉病变的解剖学测量值与 FFR 值有中度相关性,尽管它们因血管大小而异。IVUS MLA 可替代 FFR 用于评估中度冠状动脉病变的介入治疗需求。然而,应始终考虑血管大小。