• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

咨询医院临床伦理委员会的障碍和促进因素。

Barriers and facilitators to consulting hospital clinical ethics committees.

机构信息

School of Nursing, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, Newfoundland, Canada.

出版信息

Nurs Ethics. 2011 Nov;18(6):767-80. doi: 10.1177/0969733011403808. Epub 2011 Jun 6.

DOI:10.1177/0969733011403808
PMID:21646320
Abstract

Hospitals in many countries have had clinical ethics committees for over 20 years. Despite this, there has been little research to evaluate these committees and growing evidence that they are underutilized. To address this gap, we investigated the question 'What are the barriers and facilitators nurses and physicians perceive in consulting their hospital ethics committee?' Thirty-four nurses, 10 nurse managers and 31 physicians working at four Canadian hospitals were interviewed using a semi-structured interview guide as part of a larger investigation. We used content analysis of the interview data related to barriers and facilitators to use of hospital ethics committees to identify nine categories of barriers and nine categories of facilitators. These categories as well as their subcategories are discussed and those specific to nurses or physicians are identified. The need to increase health professionals' use of clinical ethics committees through reducing barriers and maximizing facilitators is discussed.

摘要

许多国家的医院都设有临床伦理委员会已有 20 多年了。尽管如此,针对这些委员会的研究却很少,越来越多的证据表明这些委员会并未得到充分利用。为了弥补这一空白,我们调查了“护士和医生在咨询医院伦理委员会时,他们认为有哪些障碍和促进因素?”这一问题。作为一项更大规模调查的一部分,我们采访了四家加拿大医院的 34 名护士、10 名护士长和 31 名医生,使用半结构化访谈指南进行访谈。我们对与使用医院伦理委员会的障碍和促进因素相关的访谈数据进行了内容分析,以确定了 9 个类别的障碍因素和 9 个类别的促进因素。讨论了这些类别及其子类别,并确定了具体针对护士或医生的类别。讨论了通过减少障碍因素和最大化促进因素来增加卫生专业人员使用临床伦理委员会的必要性。

相似文献

1
Barriers and facilitators to consulting hospital clinical ethics committees.咨询医院临床伦理委员会的障碍和促进因素。
Nurs Ethics. 2011 Nov;18(6):767-80. doi: 10.1177/0969733011403808. Epub 2011 Jun 6.
2
Ethical conflicts with hospitals: the perspective of nurses and physicians.与医院的伦理冲突:护士和医生的观点。
Nurs Ethics. 2011 Nov;18(6):756-66. doi: 10.1177/0969733011401121. Epub 2011 Oct 5.
3
Barriers and challenges in clinical ethics consultations: the experiences of nine clinical ethics committees.临床伦理咨询中的障碍与挑战:九个临床伦理委员会的经验
Bioethics. 2009 Oct;23(8):460-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00664.x. Epub 2008 Jun 28.
4
Clinical ethical conflicts of nurses and physicians.护士和医师的临床伦理冲突。
Nurs Ethics. 2011 Jan;18(1):9-19. doi: 10.1177/0969733010385532.
5
A qualitative study of barriers and facilitators of the charge nurse role.对责任护士角色的障碍因素和促进因素的定性研究。
Nurs Leadersh Forum. 2003 Summer;7(4):157-64.
6
Physicians' and nurses' expectations and objections toward a clinical ethics committee.医生和护士对临床伦理委员会的期望与异议。
Nurs Ethics. 2013 Nov;20(7):771-83. doi: 10.1177/0969733013478308. Epub 2013 May 28.
7
Barriers to, and facilitators of post-operative pain management in Iranian nursing: a qualitative research study.伊朗护理中术后疼痛管理的障碍与促进因素:一项定性研究
Int Nurs Rev. 2008 Dec;55(4):468-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-7657.2008.00659.x.
8
Nurses' perceptions, understanding and experiences of health promotion.护士对健康促进的认知、理解与经验
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Jun;16(6):1039-49. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.01640.x.
9
Barriers and facilitators influencing the implementation of an interactive Internet-portal application for patient education in psychiatric hospitals.影响精神病医院交互式互联网门户应用程序用于患者教育实施的障碍与促进因素。
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Mar;70(3):412-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.11.002.
10
Impact of language barrier on acute care medical professionals is dependent upon role.语言障碍对急症医疗专业人员的影响取决于其角色。
J Prof Nurs. 2006 Nov-Dec;22(6):355-8. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2006.09.001.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying and Prioritizing Ethical Challenges in Clinical Services of Patients With Confirmed COVID-19 in Iran's Hospitals.识别并优先处理伊朗医院中确诊COVID-19患者临床服务中的伦理挑战。
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2024 Dec 13;11:23821205241307475. doi: 10.1177/23821205241307475. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
2
Challenges of hospital ethics committees: a phenomenological study.医院伦理委员会面临的挑战:一项现象学研究
J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2021 Dec 11;14:26. doi: 10.18502/jmehm.v14i26.8282. eCollection 2021.
3
Clinical ethics case consultation in a university department of cardiology and intensive care: a descriptive evaluation of consultation protocols.
心内科和重症监护病房临床伦理案例咨询:咨询协议的描述性评估。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Jul 23;22(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00668-6.
4
[The Tübingen Model "Ethics Consultants on the Ward": a pilot project to establish decentralized structures of clinical ethics consultation at a university hospital].[图宾根模式“病房伦理顾问”:在大学医院建立分散式临床伦理咨询结构的试点项目]
Ethik Med. 2021;33(2):257-274. doi: 10.1007/s00481-021-00635-0. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
5
Identifying disincentives to ethics consultation requests among physicians, advance practice providers, and nurses: a quality improvement all staff survey at a tertiary academic medical center.识别医生、高级实践提供者和护士提出伦理咨询请求的障碍:在一家三级学术医疗中心进行的全体员工质量改进调查。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Apr 13;22(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00613-7.
6
Making the (Business) Case for Clinical Ethics Support in the UK.为英国的临床伦理支持提出(商业)案例。
HEC Forum. 2021 Dec;33(4):371-391. doi: 10.1007/s10730-020-09416-6.
7
Evaluating assessment tools of the quality of clinical ethics consultations: a systematic scoping review from 1992 to 2019.评估临床伦理咨询质量的评估工具:1992年至2019年的系统综述。
BMC Med Ethics. 2020 Jul 1;21(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12910-020-00492-4.
8
Ethics of End of Life Decisions in Pediatrics: A Narrative Review of the Roles of Caregivers, Shared Decision-Making, and Patient Centered Values.儿科临终决策的伦理:关于照顾者角色、共同决策和以患者为中心价值观的叙述性综述
Behav Sci (Basel). 2018 Apr 26;8(5):42. doi: 10.3390/bs8050042.
9
Hospital/clinical ethics committees' notion: an overview.医院/临床伦理委员会的概念:概述
J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2016 Dec 18;9:17. eCollection 2016.