Porostocky Peter, Chiba Noaki, Colacino Palma, Sadowski Dan, Singh Harminder
Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Gastroenterlogy, Universityof Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba.
Can J Gastroenterol. 2011 May;25(5):255-60. doi: 10.1155/2011/783706.
There are limited data regarding the use of sedation for colonoscopy and concomitant monitoring practices in different countries.
A survey was mailed to 445 clinician members of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology and 80 members of the Canadian Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons in May and June 2009.
Sixty-five per cent of Canadian Association of Gastroenterology members and 69% of Canadian Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons members responded with the full survey. Most endoscopists reported using sedation for more than 90% of colonoscopies. The most common sedation regimen was a combination of midazolam and fentanyl. Propofol, either alone or with another drug, was used in 12% of cases. A higher proportion (94%) of adult gastroenterologists who routinely used propofol were highly satisfied compared with those using other sedative agents (45%; P<0.001). Fifty per cent of adult gastroenterologists and 29% of surgeons who were not currently using propofol expressed interest in starting to use it for routine colonoscopies. Only a single nurse was present in the endoscopy room during colonoscopy performed by two-thirds of the endoscopists.
Results of the present survey suggest that gastroenterologists in Canada use sedation for colonoscopy in more than 90% of their patients. There was higher satisfaction among gastroenterologists who used propofol routinely for all colonoscopies. Most endoscopy rooms were staffed by a single nurse, which may limit further increases in the use of propofol. Further studies are needed to determine optimal staffing of endoscopy units with and without the use of propofol. Sedation practices of general surgery endoscopists need to be evaluated.
关于不同国家在结肠镜检查中使用镇静剂及同步监测方法的数据有限。
2009年5月和6月,向加拿大胃肠病学协会的445名临床医生成员以及加拿大结肠和直肠外科医生协会的80名成员邮寄了一份调查问卷。
65%的加拿大胃肠病学协会成员和69%的加拿大结肠和直肠外科医生协会成员回复了完整的调查问卷。大多数内镜医师报告称,超过90%的结肠镜检查使用了镇静剂。最常用的镇静方案是咪达唑仑和芬太尼联合使用。12%的病例单独使用丙泊酚或丙泊酚与其他药物联合使用。与使用其他镇静剂的成人胃肠病学家(45%)相比,常规使用丙泊酚的成人胃肠病学家中,有更高比例(94%)的人非常满意(P<0.001)。目前未使用丙泊酚的成人胃肠病学家中有50%、外科医生中有29%表示有兴趣开始在常规结肠镜检查中使用丙泊酚。三分之二的内镜医师在进行结肠镜检查时,内镜检查室中只有一名护士在场。
本次调查结果表明,加拿大的胃肠病学家在超过90%的患者结肠镜检查中使用了镇静剂。常规对所有结肠镜检查使用丙泊酚的胃肠病学家满意度更高。大多数内镜检查室只有一名护士值班,这可能会限制丙泊酚使用的进一步增加。需要进一步研究以确定在内镜检查科室使用和不使用丙泊酚时的最佳人员配置。普通外科内镜医师的镇静方法需要进行评估。