• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响下颌后缩和下颌前突患者颏部偏斜的颌面特征。

Maxillofacial characteristics affecting chin deviation between mandibular retrusion and prognathism patients.

机构信息

Case School of Dental Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

Angle Orthod. 2011 Nov;81(6):988-93. doi: 10.2319/112210-681.1. Epub 2011 Jun 7.

DOI:10.2319/112210-681.1
PMID:21649508
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8903842/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine and compare the maxillofacial characteristics affecting chin deviation three-dimensionally in facial asymmetry patients with mandibular retrusion and mandibular prognathism.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Maxillofacial computed tomography (CT) scan data were obtained from 48 orthognathic surgery patients (24 cases of mandibular retrusion and 24 cases of mandibular prognathism) with facial asymmetry. Although chin deviation was assessed on the basis of the ANS-to-menton line on frontal cephalograms, its contributing factors were evaluated on three-dimensional CT images. Maxillary height, ramus length, frontal ramal inclination, lateral ramal inclination, mandibular body length, and body height were defined on each side, and right-left differences were calculated and analyzed.

RESULTS

In an assessment of chin deviation, subjects in this study showed predominantly left side deviation regardless of the group, and the degree of menton deviation did not reveal significant differences between groups. In a comparison of right-left differences in contributing factors, all values were noted to be greater in the retrusion group, except for body height, which showed no difference between chin-deviated and contralateral sides. In particular, ramus length presented a statistically significant difference between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Based on the same degree of chin deviation in mandibular prognathism and retrusion in this study, results of right-left differences in contributing factors indicate that chin deviations are expressed easily in mandibular prognathism, whereas they occur only with significant right-left differences in relevant maxillofacial structures in individuals with mandibular retrusion.

摘要

目的

研究并比较下颌后缩和下颌前突的面部不对称患者中影响颏部偏斜的三维颌面特征。

材料和方法

从 48 例接受正颌手术的面部不对称患者(24 例下颌后缩,24 例下颌前突)中获取颌面计算机断层扫描(CT)数据。尽管颏部偏斜是基于侧位头颅定位片的 ANS 至颏下连线来评估的,但在三维 CT 图像上评估了其影响因素。在每一侧定义了上颌高度、下颌升支长度、前升支倾斜度、侧升支倾斜度、下颌体长度和体高度,并计算和分析了左右差异。

结果

在评估颏部偏斜时,无论组别如何,本研究的受试者均表现为明显的左侧偏斜,且颏部偏斜程度在组间无显著差异。在比较影响因素的左右差异时,除了下颌体高度,所有值在后退组中均较大,而在颏部偏斜侧和对侧之间无差异。特别是下颌升支长度在两组之间存在统计学差异。

结论

在本研究中,下颌前突和后退的颏部偏斜程度相同的情况下,影响因素的左右差异结果表明,下颌前突容易表现出颏部偏斜,而下颌后缩的患者只有在相关颌面结构存在明显的左右差异时才会出现。

相似文献

1
Maxillofacial characteristics affecting chin deviation between mandibular retrusion and prognathism patients.影响下颌后缩和下颌前突患者颏部偏斜的颌面特征。
Angle Orthod. 2011 Nov;81(6):988-93. doi: 10.2319/112210-681.1. Epub 2011 Jun 7.
2
Relationship between the masticatory muscles and mandibular skeleton in mandibular prognathism with and without asymmetry.伴有或不伴有不对称的下颌前突患者咀嚼肌与下颌骨骨骼之间的关系
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007 Aug;65(8):1538-43. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2006.09.024.
3
Three-dimensional computed tomography analysis of mandibular morphology in patients with facial asymmetry and mandibular prognathism.面部不对称和下颌前突患者下颌形态的三维 CT 分析。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Nov;138(5):540.e1-8; discussion 540-1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.04.025.
4
Morphologic relationship between the cranial base and the mandible in patients with facial asymmetry and mandibular prognathism.颅底和面骨不对称及下颌前突患者的颅底与下颌之间的形态关系。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Sep;144(3):330-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.03.024.
5
Comprehending the three-dimensional mandibular morphology of facial asymmetry patients with mandibular prognathism.理解下颌前突的面部不对称患者的下颌三维形态。
Prog Orthod. 2017 Dec 15;18(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s40510-017-0197-6.
6
Tooth axis and skeletal structures in mandibular molar vertical sections in jaw deformity with facial asymmetry using MPR images.使用多平面重组(MPR)图像分析面部不对称性颌骨畸形患者下颌磨牙垂直截面中的牙轴与骨骼结构。
Bull Tokyo Dent Coll. 2007 Nov;48(4):171-6. doi: 10.2209/tdcpublication.48.171.
7
Does skeletal surgery for asymmetric mandibular prognathism influence the soft tissue contour and thickness?不对称性下颌前突的骨骼手术会影响软组织轮廓和厚度吗?
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Sep;71(9):1577-87. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2013.04.008. Epub 2013 Jun 22.
8
Three-dimensional evaluation of mandibular asymmetry: a new classification and three-dimensional cephalometric analysis.下颌不对称的三维评估:一种新分类及三维头影测量分析
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Aug;47(8):1043-1051. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2018.03.021. Epub 2018 Apr 8.
9
Evaluation and comparison of postero-anterior cephalograms and cone-beam computed tomography images for the detection of mandibular asymmetry.评估和比较前后位头颅侧位片和锥形束 CT 图像在检测下颌骨不对称中的应用。
Eur J Orthod. 2013 Feb;35(1):45-50. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjr045. Epub 2011 Mar 31.
10
Morphologic evaluation and classification of facial asymmetry using 3-dimensional computed tomography.使用三维计算机断层扫描对面部不对称进行形态学评估和分类。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 May;70(5):1161-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.02.135. Epub 2011 Jul 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Chin asymmetry perception among orthodontists, general dentists, and laypersons.正畸医生、普通牙医和外行人对下巴不对称的认知。
J Orthod Sci. 2025 Jun 10;14:19. doi: 10.4103/jos.jos_168_23. eCollection 2025.
2
Decoding Facial Dissymmetry: A Comparative Morphological Study on Human Skulls and Facial Structures.解读面部不对称:关于人类头骨和面部结构的比较形态学研究
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2025 Feb 19;13(2):e6514. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006514. eCollection 2025 Feb.
3
Facial asymmetry of the hard and soft tissues in skeletal Class I, II, and III patients.骨骼 I 类、II 类和 III 类患者的硬组织和软组织的面部不对称。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 29;14(1):4966. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-55107-4.
4
Skeletal structure of asymmetric mandibular prognathism and retrognathism.不对称下颌前突与后缩的骨骼结构
Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 Aug 9;45(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s40902-023-00393-7.
5
3-dimensional analysis of hard- and soft-tissue symmetry in a Chinese population.中国人颌面软硬组织对称性的三维分析
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Jun 29;23(1):432. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03163-z.
6
Comparison of Mandibular Volume and Linear Measurements in Patients with Mandibular Asymmetry.下颌不对称患者下颌体积与线性测量的比较。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Apr 3;13(7):1331. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13071331.
7
Is the pattern of mandibular asymmetry in mild craniofacial microsomia comparable to non-syndromic class II asymmetry?轻度颅面骨发育不全的下颌骨不对称模式是否与非综合征性 II 类不对称相似?
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Jun;26(6):4603-4613. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04429-6. Epub 2022 Feb 26.
8
Transverse Asymmetries of the Maxilla Even in Healthy and Apparently Symmetrical Subjects.上颌骨的横向不对称性:即使在健康且表面对称的受试者中也是如此。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 8;18(2):446. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18020446.
9
Comparison of maxillomandibular asymmetries in adult patients presenting different sagittal jaw relationships.不同矢状颌关系成年患者的上颌下颌不对称性比较。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2019 Sep 5;24(4):54-62. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.24.4.054-062.oar.
10
Laterality and Left-sidedness in the Nose, Face, and Body: A New Finding.鼻子、面部和身体的偏侧性与左侧性:一项新发现。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017 Dec 28;5(12):e1590. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001590. eCollection 2017 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program.使用正畸容积再现程序构建的锥形束CT衍生三维图像的线性准确性和可靠性。
Angle Orthod. 2008 May;78(3):387-95. doi: 10.2319/122106-52.1.
2
Asymmetry of the face in orthodontic patients.正畸患者面部的不对称。
Angle Orthod. 2008 May;78(3):421-6. doi: 10.2319/022107-85.1.
3
Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography imaging of the temporomandibular joint: comparisons with panoramic radiology and linear tomography.锥形束计算机断层扫描对颞下颌关节成像的准确性:与全景放射摄影和线性断层扫描的比较。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Oct;132(4):429-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.10.032.
4
Mandibular asymmetry in different occlusion patterns.不同咬合模式下的下颌不对称。
Angle Orthod. 2007 Sep;77(5):803-7. doi: 10.2319/092506-392.
5
Skeletodental factors affecting chin point deviation in female patients with class III malocclusion and facial asymmetry: a three-dimensional analysis using computed tomography.影响Ⅲ类错牙合畸形及面部不对称女性患者颏点偏移的骨骼牙齿因素:基于计算机断层扫描的三维分析
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007 Nov;104(5):628-39. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.03.002. Epub 2007 Jul 25.
6
Geometric accuracy of a newly developed cone-beam device for maxillofacial imaging.一种新开发的用于颌面成像的锥形束设备的几何精度。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007 Oct;104(4):551-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.02.021. Epub 2007 Jul 5.
7
Accuracy of measurements of mandibular anatomy in cone beam computed tomography images.锥形束计算机断层扫描图像中下颌骨解剖结构测量的准确性。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007 Apr;103(4):534-42. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.04.008. Epub 2006 Aug 4.
8
Maxillofacial 3-dimensional image analysis for the diagnosis of facial asymmetry.用于面部不对称诊断的颌面三维图像分析
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Dec;130(6):779-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.02.021.
9
Accuracy of three-dimensional measurements using cone-beam CT.使用锥形束CT进行三维测量的准确性。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2006 Nov;35(6):410-6. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/20987648.
10
Three-dimensional cephalometry: spiral multi-slice vs cone-beam computed tomography.三维头影测量术:螺旋多层与锥形束计算机断层扫描
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Sep;130(3):410-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.11.035.