• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

好奇心与医学教育。

Curiosity and medical education.

机构信息

Department of Family and Social Medicine, Montefiore MedicalCenter ⁄ Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 11542, USA.

出版信息

Med Educ. 2011 Jul;45(7):663-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.03944.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.03944.x
PMID:21649698
Abstract

CONTEXT

For doctors, curiosity is fundamental to understanding each patient's unique experience of illness, building respectful relationships with patients, deepening self-awareness, supporting clinical reasoning, avoiding premature closure and encouraging lifelong learning. Yet, curiosity has received limited attention in medical education and research, and studies from the fields of cognitive psychology and education suggest that common practices in medical education may inadvertently suppress curiosity.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to identify common barriers to and facilitators of curiosity and related habits of mind in the education of doctors.

METHODS

We conducted a theory-driven conceptual exploration and qualitative review of the literature.

RESULTS

Curiosity is related to inquisitiveness, reflection and mindfulness. Instructional practices can suppress curiosity by confusing haste with efficiency, neglecting negative emotions, promoting overconfidence and using teaching approaches that encourage passive learning. Curiosity tends to flourish in educational environments that promote the student's responsibility for his or her own learning, multiple perspectives and mindful reflection on both the subject and the learning process. Specific educational strategies that can support curiosity in classroom and clinical settings include the mindful pacing of teaching, modelling effective management of emotions, confronting uncertainty and overconfidence, using inquiry-based learning, helping students see familiar situations as novel, simultaneously considering multiple perspectives, and maximising the value of small-group discussions. Instructor attributes that contribute to the development of student curiosity include patience, a habit of inquiry, emotional candour, intellectual humility, transparency and recognition of the benefits to be gained in learning from peers.

CONCLUSIONS

Curiosity, inquisitiveness and related habits of mind can be supported in medical education through specific, evidence-based instructional approaches. Medical educators should balance the teaching of facts, techniques and protocols with approaches that help students cultivate and sustain curiosity and wonder in the context-rich, often ambiguous world of clinical medicine.

摘要

背景

对于医生来说,好奇心对于理解每个患者独特的疾病体验、与患者建立尊重的关系、加深自我意识、支持临床推理、避免过早下结论以及鼓励终身学习至关重要。然而,好奇心在医学教育和研究中受到的关注有限,认知心理学和教育学领域的研究表明,医学教育中的常见做法可能会无意中抑制好奇心。

目的

本研究旨在确定在医生教育中,好奇心的常见障碍和促进因素以及相关思维习惯。

方法

我们进行了理论驱动的概念探索和文献定性综述。

结果

好奇心与探究、反思和正念有关。教学实践可能会通过将匆忙与效率混淆、忽视负面情绪、促进过度自信以及使用鼓励被动学习的教学方法来抑制好奇心。在促进学生对自己学习负责、多种观点以及对学习过程和主题进行深思熟虑的反思的教育环境中,好奇心往往会蓬勃发展。在课堂和临床环境中支持好奇心的具体教育策略包括教学的正念 pacing、示范有效管理情绪、面对不确定性和过度自信、使用探究式学习、帮助学生将熟悉的情况视为新颖、同时考虑多种观点以及最大限度地提高小组讨论的价值。有助于培养学生好奇心的教师特质包括耐心、探究习惯、情感坦诚、知识谦逊、透明度和认识到从同伴学习中获益的重要性。

结论

在医学教育中,可以通过具体的、基于证据的教学方法来支持好奇心、探究和相关思维习惯。医学教育者应该在教授事实、技术和方案的同时,采用有助于学生在以临床为背景的丰富而常常模糊的医学世界中培养和维持好奇心和探索欲的方法。

相似文献

1
Curiosity and medical education.好奇心与医学教育。
Med Educ. 2011 Jul;45(7):663-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.03944.x.
2
Curiosity.好奇心。
Minn Med. 1999 Mar;82(3):10-2, 49.
3
Curiosity: a best practice in education.
Med Educ. 2011 Jul;45(7):654-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04017.x.
4
Perspective: The doctor as performer: a proposal for change based on a performance studies paradigm.观点:医生作为表演者:基于表演研究范式的变革建议。
Acad Med. 2010 Jan;85(1):159-63. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181c427eb.
5
[Empathy-building of physicians. Part II--Early exposure of students to patient's situation].[医生的同理心培养。第二部分——让学生尽早接触患者情况]
Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2010 Oct;29(172):282-6.
6
Medical students, intellectual curiosity, and algorithmic medicine: reflections of a teacher.医学生、求知欲与循证医学:一位教师的思考
Coron Artery Dis. 2009 Nov;20(7):477-8. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0b013e328330d34c.
7
Faculty-development activity to promote effective communication between instructors and students.促进教师与学生之间有效沟通的教师发展活动。
Clin Teach. 2010 Jun;7(2):121-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-498X.2010.00340.x.
8
An untapped potential: Curiosity in medical school.未被开发的潜力:医学专业学生的好奇心。
Med Teach. 2024 Jul;46(7):939-947. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2023.2288546. Epub 2023 Dec 4.
9
[Empathy-building of physicians. Part I--A review of applied methods].[医生的同理心培养。第一部分——应用方法综述]
Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2010 Oct;29(172):277-81.
10
The mentored clinical casebook project at Harvard Medical School.哈佛医学院的临床案例手册指导项目。
Acad Med. 2007 May;82(5):516-20. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31803eaed9.

引用本文的文献

1
Harnessing storytelling with medical students and community members to build curiosity and trust: A mixed methods evaluation of a pilot intervention.利用与医学生和社区成员的故事讲述来培养好奇心和信任:一项试点干预措施的混合方法评估
PEC Innov. 2025 Jul 9;7:100420. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2025.100420. eCollection 2025 Dec.
2
Curious About Curiosity: Preliminary Validity Evidence for a Multidimensional Curiosity Scale in Medical Students.对好奇心的好奇:医学生多维好奇心量表的初步效度证据
Med Sci Educ. 2024 Dec 3;35(2):837-846. doi: 10.1007/s40670-024-02242-2. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3
What Should Primary Prevention in Burnout Look Like? Promoting Attributes, Roles and Social Networks with Instrumental Outcomes.
职业倦怠的一级预防应该是什么样的?通过工具性结果促进特质、角色和社交网络。
Med Sci Educ. 2025 Jan 10;35(2):1093-1100. doi: 10.1007/s40670-024-02276-6. eCollection 2025 Apr.
4
The effect of a provisional diagnosis on intern diagnostic reasoning: a mixed methods study.临时诊断对实习医生诊断推理的影响:一项混合方法研究。
Diagnosis (Berl). 2025 Jan 1;12(2):208-216. doi: 10.1515/dx-2024-0097. eCollection 2025 May 1.
5
Physicians have feelings: illuminating the relationship between emotional valence, clinical reasoning and context specificity.医生有情感:阐明情感效价、临床推理和情境特异性之间的关系。
Med Educ Online. 2024 Dec 31;29(1):2404299. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2024.2404299. Epub 2024 Sep 23.
6
The curious physician: exploring the role of curiosity in professionalism, patient care, and well-being.好奇的医生:探索好奇心在专业精神、患者护理和健康中的作用。
Ann Med. 2024 Dec;56(1):2392887. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2392887. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
7
Systematic Curiosity as an Integrative Tool for Human Flourishing: A Conceptual Review and Framework.作为促进人类繁荣的综合工具的系统性好奇心:概念性综述与框架
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2024 Dec;58(4):1876-1894. doi: 10.1007/s12124-024-09856-6. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
8
Reflective practice is a prerequisite for One Health development.反思性实践是“同一个健康”发展的前提条件。
One Health Outlook. 2024 Jul 2;6(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s42522-024-00106-8.
9
Storylines of family medicine IV: perspectives on practice-lenses of appreciation.家庭医学叙事 IV:实践视角——欣赏之镜。
Fam Med Community Health. 2024 Apr 12;12(Suppl 3):e002791. doi: 10.1136/fmch-2024-002791.
10
Twelve tips for promoting professionalism through reflective small group learning.通过反思性小组学习提升专业素养的十二条建议。
MedEdPublish (2016). 2017 Mar 6;6:43. doi: 10.15694/mep.2017.000043. eCollection 2017.