Suppr超能文献

综合神经肌肉抑制技术对非特异性颈部疼痛患者上斜方肌触发点的疗效:一项随机对照试验。

The efficacy of an integrated neuromuscular inhibition technique on upper trapezius trigger points in subjects with non-specific neck pain: a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Nagrale Amit V, Glynn Paul, Joshi Aakanksha, Ramteke Gopichand

机构信息

Escorts Physical Therapy College, Dhamtari, India.

出版信息

J Man Manip Ther. 2010 Mar;18(1):37-43. doi: 10.1179/106698110X12595770849605.

Abstract

Currently, large levels of practice variability exist regarding the clinical deactivation of trigger points. Manual physical therapy has been identified as a potential means of resolving active trigger points; however, to date the ideal treatment approach has yet to be elucidated. The purpose of this clinical trial was to compare the effects of two manual treatment regimens on individuals with upper trapezius trigger points. Sixty patients, 19-38 years of age with non-specific neck pain and upper trapezius trigger points, were randomized into one of two, 4 week physical therapy programs. One group received muscle energy techniques while the second group received an integrated neuromuscular inhibition technique (INIT) consisting of muscle energy techniques, ischemic compression, and strain-counterstrain (SCS). Outcomes including a visual analog pain scale (VAS), the neck disability index (NDI), and lateral cervical flexion range of motion (ROM) were collected at baseline, 2 and 4 weeks after the initiation of therapy. Results revealed large pre-post-effect sizes within the INIT group (Cohen's d  =  0.97, 0.94 and 0.97). Additionally, significantly greater improvements in pain and neck disability and lateral cervical flexion ROM were detected in favor of the INIT group (0.29-0.57, 0.57-1.12 and 0.29-0.57) at a 95% CI respectively. The findings of this study indicate the potential benefit of an integrated approach in deactivating upper trapezius trigger points. Further research should be performed to investigate the long-term benefits of the current treatment approach.

摘要

目前,在触发点的临床失活方面存在很大程度的实践差异。手法物理治疗已被确定为解决活跃触发点的一种潜在方法;然而,迄今为止,理想的治疗方法尚未阐明。这项临床试验的目的是比较两种手法治疗方案对患有上斜方肌触发点的个体的效果。60名年龄在19 - 38岁之间、患有非特异性颈部疼痛和上斜方肌触发点的患者被随机分为两个为期4周的物理治疗方案之一。一组接受肌肉能量技术,而第二组接受综合神经肌肉抑制技术(INIT),该技术包括肌肉能量技术、缺血性压迫和应变 - 反应变(SCS)。在基线、治疗开始后2周和4周收集包括视觉模拟疼痛量表(VAS)、颈部残疾指数(NDI)和颈椎侧屈活动范围(ROM)等结果。结果显示INIT组内前后效应量较大(科恩d值分别为0.97、0.94和0.97)。此外,在95%置信区间,分别检测到INIT组在疼痛、颈部残疾和颈椎侧屈ROM方面有显著更大的改善(分别为0.29 - 0.57、0.57 - 1.12和0.29 - 0.57)。本研究结果表明综合方法在使上斜方肌触发点失活方面的潜在益处。应进行进一步研究以调查当前治疗方法的长期益处。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

4
Massage for neck pain.颈部疼痛按摩。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Feb 28;2(2):CD004871. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004871.pub5.

本文引用的文献

4
Evaluation and treatment of posterior neck pain in family practice.家庭医疗中后颈部疼痛的评估与治疗
J Am Board Fam Pract. 2004 Nov-Dec;17 Suppl:S13-22. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.17.suppl_1.s13.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验