University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98102, USA.
J Am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc. 2011 Jan-Feb;17(1):17-29. doi: 10.1177/1078390310394658.
Fidelity assessment is important for implementation of evidence-based practices (EBPs), including assertive community treatment (ACT).
The TMACT, an enhanced fidelity tool, was developed and pilot-tested to better assess critical ACT structures and processes.
Ten ACT teams were administered the TMACT and the long-standing ACT fidelity measure, the Dartmouth Assertive Community Treatment Scale (DACTS), at baseline, 6, 12, and 18 months.
Overall, fidelity scores for all 10 teams were relatively high. Six teams showed improvement, concluding with high TMACT scores at 18 months. Four teams with significantly lower total scores had experienced turnover and organizational barriers. TMACT ratings were higher in core ACT practices than in recovery practices and EBPs. TMACT scores rose steadily but were significantly lower than DACTS scores, which remained unchanged.
The TMACT sets higher performance standards through enhanced assessment of recovery-orientation, EBPs, and teamwork and is more sensitive to change than the DACTS.
保真度评估对于实施循证实践(EBP)很重要,包括强化社区治疗(ACT)。
TMACT 是一种增强的保真度工具,旨在更好地评估关键的 ACT 结构和过程,已经开发并进行了试点测试。
在基线、6、12 和 18 个月时,10 个 ACT 团队接受了 TMACT 和长期的 ACT 保真度衡量标准,即达特茅斯强化社区治疗量表(DACTS)。
总的来说,所有 10 个团队的保真度得分都相对较高。6 个团队表现出了改善,在 18 个月时达到了 TMACT 的高分。4 个总得分明显较低的团队经历了人员流动和组织障碍。TMACT 评分在核心 ACT 实践中高于康复实践和 EBP。TMACT 分数稳步上升,但明显低于 DACTS 分数,后者保持不变。
TMACT 通过增强对康复导向、EBP 和团队合作的评估,设定了更高的绩效标准,并且比 DACTS 更敏感于变化。