• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分辨事物:反应键之间的距离会影响分类时间。

Telling things apart: the distance between response keys influences categorization times.

机构信息

School of Innovation Sciences, Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Psychol Sci. 2011 Jul;22(7):887-90. doi: 10.1177/0956797611412391. Epub 2011 Jun 9.

DOI:10.1177/0956797611412391
PMID:21659635
Abstract

People use spatial distance to talk and think about differences between concepts, and it has been argued that using space to think about different categories provides a scaffold for the categorization process. In the current study, we investigated the possibility that the distance between response keys can influence categorization times in binary classification tasks. In line with the hypothesis that distance between response keys can facilitate response selection in a key-press version of the Stroop task, our results showed that responses on incongruent Stroop trials were significantly facilitated when participants performed the Stroop task with response keys located far apart, compared with when they performed the task with response keys located close together. These results support the idea that the spatial structuring of response options facilitates categorizations that require cognitive effort, and that people can incorporate environmental structures such as spatial distance in their thought processes. Keeping your hands apart might actually help to keep things apart in your mind.

摘要

人们使用空间距离来谈论和思考概念之间的差异,有人认为,使用空间来思考不同的类别为分类过程提供了一个支架。在目前的研究中,我们调查了反应键之间的距离是否会影响二进制分类任务中的分类时间。与距离反应键可以促进按键版本斯特鲁普任务中反应选择的假设一致,我们的结果表明,当参与者使用位于远处的反应键执行斯特鲁普任务时,与当他们使用位于近处的反应键执行任务时相比,在不一致的斯特鲁普试验上的反应明显得到促进。这些结果支持这样一种观点,即反应选项的空间结构促进了需要认知努力的分类,并且人们可以将环境结构(如空间距离)纳入其思维过程中。将手分开实际上可能有助于在头脑中保持事物的分离。

相似文献

1
Telling things apart: the distance between response keys influences categorization times.分辨事物:反应键之间的距离会影响分类时间。
Psychol Sci. 2011 Jul;22(7):887-90. doi: 10.1177/0956797611412391. Epub 2011 Jun 9.
2
Dissociating influences of key and hand separation on the Stroop color-identification effect.区分按键与手部分离对斯特鲁普颜色识别效应的影响。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2012 Sep;141(1):39-47. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.06.005. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
3
Things can be told apart: no influence of response categories and labels on the distance effect in Stroop tasks.
Exp Psychol. 2014;61(2):142-8. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000234.
4
Visual capture of apparent limb position influences tactile temporal order judgments.对明显肢体位置的视觉捕捉会影响触觉时间顺序判断。
Neurosci Lett. 2005 Apr 29;379(1):63-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2004.12.052. Epub 2005 Jan 18.
5
Conceptual response distance and intervening keys distinguish action goals in the Stroop color-identification task.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Oct;21(5):1238-43. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0605-6.
6
Response-repetition effects in task switching - dissociating effects of anatomical and spatial response discriminability.任务切换中的反应重复效应——解剖学和空间反应可辨别性的分离效应
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011 Mar;136(3):399-404. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.01.006. Epub 2011 Feb 5.
7
Task switching and serial memory: looking into the nature of switches and tasks.任务切换与序列记忆:探究切换与任务的本质
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011 Jan;136(1):137-47. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.11.002. Epub 2010 Dec 13.
8
Need for space: the key distance effect depends on spatial stimulus configurations.需要空间:关键距离效应取决于空间刺激配置。
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 18;9(3):e91432. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091432. eCollection 2014.
9
Attentional control adjustments in Eriksen and Stroop task performance can be independent of response conflict.在埃里克森任务和斯特鲁普任务表现中,注意力控制调整可以独立于反应冲突。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2011 Jun;64(6):1056-81. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2010.523792. Epub 2010 Nov 28.
10
Task-based working memory guidance of visual attention.基于任务的工作记忆对视觉注意力的引导
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 May;73(4):1082-95. doi: 10.3758/s13414-010-0087-1.

引用本文的文献

1
It's not distance but similarity of distance: changing stimulus relations affect the control of action sequences.不是距离,而是距离的相似性:改变刺激关系会影响动作序列的控制。
Psychol Res. 2024 Jul;88(5):1727-1736. doi: 10.1007/s00426-024-01973-6. Epub 2024 May 11.
2
Separated hands further response-response binding effects. 分离的手进一步产生反应-反应绑定效应。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Oct;31(5):2226-2233. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02419-7. Epub 2024 Mar 4.
3
Relational reasoning in wild bumblebees revisited: the role of distance.
重新审视野生大黄蜂的关系推理:距离的作用。
Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 15;13(1):22311. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-49840-5.
4
Close to the same: Similarity influences remembered distance between stimuli.接近相同:相似性影响对刺激物之间距离的记忆。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Oct;30(5):1814-1828. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02267-5. Epub 2023 Mar 29.
5
The effect of spatial distance between objects on categorization level.物体之间空间距离对分类水平的影响。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Feb;29(1):230-242. doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-01949-2. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
6
Different effects of spatial separation in action and perception.动作和感知中空间分离的不同影响。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Jun;28(3):845-852. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01867-9. Epub 2021 Jan 26.
7
Need for space: the key distance effect depends on spatial stimulus configurations.需要空间:关键距离效应取决于空间刺激配置。
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 18;9(3):e91432. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091432. eCollection 2014.
8
Conceptual response distance and intervening keys distinguish action goals in the Stroop color-identification task.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Oct;21(5):1238-43. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0605-6.