• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

接近相同:相似性影响对刺激物之间距离的记忆。

Close to the same: Similarity influences remembered distance between stimuli.

机构信息

Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany.

University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Oct;30(5):1814-1828. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02267-5. Epub 2023 Mar 29.

DOI:10.3758/s13423-023-02267-5
Abstract

Six preregistered studies show that the degree of similarity of two objects biases people's spatial memory of these objects. When objects are high in similarity, people remember having seen them closer together in space than when they are low in similarity. All six studies provide correlational evidence, showing that the more similar participants rated two stimuli, the smaller they remembered the distance between them. This was true for both conceptual and perceptual similarity (Study 3). Furthermore, Studies 2, 4A, and 4B provide evidence of causality by manipulating similarity experimentally. Replicating the correlational findings, highly similar stimuli were remembered as closer together than stimuli low in similarity. This pattern was found across different stimulus categories and similarity dimensions. Overall, these findings show that the similarity of stimuli influences perceivers' reconstruction of their spatial locations.

摘要

六项预先注册的研究表明,两个物体的相似程度会影响人们对这些物体的空间记忆。当两个物体相似程度较高时,人们会记得自己看到它们在空间上靠得更近;而当两个物体相似程度较低时,他们会记得它们之间的距离较远。这六项研究都提供了相关性证据,表明参与者对两个刺激的评价越相似,他们就越记得它们之间的距离越小。这对于概念相似性和感知相似性都是如此(研究 3)。此外,研究 2、4A 和 4B 通过实验操纵相似性提供了因果关系的证据。高度相似的刺激被记住的距离比相似度低的刺激更近,这与相关性研究的结果一致。这一模式在不同的刺激类别和相似性维度中都有发现。总的来说,这些发现表明刺激的相似性会影响感知者对其空间位置的重建。

相似文献

1
Close to the same: Similarity influences remembered distance between stimuli.接近相同:相似性影响对刺激物之间距离的记忆。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Oct;30(5):1814-1828. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02267-5. Epub 2023 Mar 29.
2
Phonological similarity between words is represented in declarative memory as spatial distance.词与词之间的语音相似性在陈述性记忆中表现为空间距离。
Psychol Res. 2023 Nov;87(8):2499-2510. doi: 10.1007/s00426-023-01830-y. Epub 2023 May 19.
3
Neural Evidence for Representational Persistence Within Events.事件内表象持续性的神经证据。
J Neurosci. 2021 Sep 15;41(37):7909-7920. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0073-21.2021. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
4
Similarity and proximity: when does close in space mean close in mind?相似性与接近性:空间上的接近何时意味着思维上的接近?
Mem Cognit. 2008 Sep;36(6):1047-56. doi: 10.3758/MC.36.6.1047.
5
Adaptive Repulsion of Long-Term Memory Representations Is Triggered by Event Similarity.长期记忆表征的自适应排斥是由事件相似性触发的。
Psychol Sci. 2021 May;32(5):705-720. doi: 10.1177/0956797620972490. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
6
α-Band activity tracks a two-dimensional spotlight of attention during spatial working memory maintenance.α 波段活动在空间工作记忆维持期间跟踪二维注意焦点。
J Neurophysiol. 2021 Mar 1;125(3):957-971. doi: 10.1152/jn.00582.2020. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
7
Influences of different combinations of conceptual, perceptual, and structural similarity on stimulus-response compatibility.概念相似性、知觉相似性和结构相似性的不同组合对刺激-反应兼容性的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol A. 2002 Jan;55(1):59-74. doi: 10.1080/02724980143000163.
8
The spatial scaffold: The effects of spatial context on memory for events.空间框架:空间背景对事件记忆的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 Feb;42(2):308-15. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000167. Epub 2015 Aug 10.
9
Asymmetric binding in serial memory for verbal and spatial information.串行记忆中言语和空间信息的不对称绑定。
Mem Cognit. 2013 Apr;41(3):378-91. doi: 10.3758/s13421-012-0275-4.
10
Linking "what" and "where" information: How the strength of object categories influences children's memory for object locations.关联“什么”与“哪里”的信息:物体类别的强度如何影响儿童对物体位置的记忆。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2017 May;157:95-110. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2016.12.012. Epub 2017 Jan 26.

本文引用的文献

1
The Restrain Food Database: validation of an open-source database of foods that should be eaten more or less as part of a healthy diet.限制饮食数据库:一个关于健康饮食中应或多或少食用的食物的开源数据库的验证
R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Nov 23;9(11):220923. doi: 10.1098/rsos.220923. eCollection 2022 Nov.
2
The effect of spatial distance between objects on categorization level.物体之间空间距离对分类水平的影响。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Feb;29(1):230-242. doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-01949-2. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
3
How Linguistic Metaphor Scaffolds Reasoning.
语言隐喻如何支撑推理。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2017 Nov;21(11):852-863. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.07.001. Epub 2017 Aug 5.
4
Spatial representation of coherence.相干性的空间表示
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2016 Jul;145(7):853-71. doi: 10.1037/xge0000176. Epub 2016 May 12.
5
Attentive Turkers: MTurk participants perform better on online attention checks than do subject pool participants.细心的土耳其工人:与样本库参与者相比,亚马逊土耳其机器人平台的参与者在在线注意力测试中的表现更好。
Behav Res Methods. 2016 Mar;48(1):400-7. doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0578-z.
6
Spatial distance effects on incremental semantic interpretation of abstract sentences: evidence from eye tracking.空间距离对抽象句子增量语义解释的影响:来自眼动追踪的证据
Cognition. 2014 Dec;133(3):535-52. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.07.007. Epub 2014 Sep 14.
7
Statistical power and optimal design in experiments in which samples of participants respond to samples of stimuli.参与者样本对刺激样本做出反应的实验中的统计功效与最优设计。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Oct;143(5):2020-45. doi: 10.1037/xge0000014. Epub 2014 Aug 11.
8
The neural correlates of beauty comparison.美丑比较的神经关联。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014 May;9(5):681-8. doi: 10.1093/scan/nst026. Epub 2013 Mar 18.
9
Treating stimuli as a random factor in social psychology: a new and comprehensive solution to a pervasive but largely ignored problem.将刺激物视为社会心理学中的随机因素:一种新的、全面的解决方案,可解决普遍存在但在很大程度上被忽视的问题。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 Jul;103(1):54-69. doi: 10.1037/a0028347. Epub 2012 May 21.
10
Telling things apart: the distance between response keys influences categorization times.分辨事物:反应键之间的距离会影响分类时间。
Psychol Sci. 2011 Jul;22(7):887-90. doi: 10.1177/0956797611412391. Epub 2011 Jun 9.