Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Mar;470(3):798-805. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-1941-8.
Previous approaches for medial collateral ligament (MCL) reconstruction have been associated with extensive exposure, risk of donor site morbidity with autografts, loss of motion, nonanatomic graft placement, and technical complexity with double-bundle constructs. Therefore, we implemented a technique that uses Achilles allograft, small incisions, and anatomic insertions to reconstruct the MCL.
The MCL femoral insertion was identified, and a socket reamed over a guide pin. The Achilles bone plug was fixed in the socket and the tendon passed distally under the skin and fixed on the tibia, creating isometric reconstruction.
We evaluated 14 patients who had this MCL reconstruction. We determined range of knee motion, knee ligament laxity, functional outcome scores (International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC]-subjective, Lysholm, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS]), and activity level scores (Tegner, Marx). Followup range was 24 to 61 months.
Knee motion was maintained in 12 cases. Grade 0-1 + valgus stability was obtained in all 14 cases. In cases of MCL with primary ACL reconstruction, IKDC-subjective, Lysholm, and KOOS-sports scores were 91 ± 6, 92 ± 6, and 93 ± 12, respectively, and return to preinjury activity levels was achieved. In cases of MCL with revision ACL reconstruction, function was inferior, and patients did not return to their preinjury activity levels.
This technique uses allograft that provides bone-to-bone healing on the femur, requires small incisions, and creates isometric reconstruction. When performed with a cruciate reconstruction, knee stability can be restored at 2 to 5 years followup. In patients with MCL with primary ACL reconstruction, return to preinjury activity level in recreational athletes can be achieved.
既往的内侧副韧带(MCL)重建方法存在广泛暴露、自体移植物供区并发症风险、运动丧失、非解剖移植物放置以及双束重建技术复杂性等问题。因此,我们采用了一种使用跟腱异体移植物、小切口和解剖学植入物来重建 MCL 的技术。
确定了 MCL 的股骨附着点,并使用导针扩孔。将跟腱骨塞固定在插座中,肌腱穿过皮肤下方并固定在胫骨上,实现等长重建。
我们评估了 14 例接受这种 MCL 重建的患者。我们评估了膝关节活动度、膝关节韧带松弛度、功能结果评分(国际膝关节文献委员会[IKDC]-主观、Lysholm、膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结果评分[KOOS])和活动水平评分(Tegner、Marx)。随访时间为 24 至 61 个月。
12 例膝关节活动度保持不变。14 例患者均获得 0-1+度外翻稳定性。对于 MCL 合并初次 ACL 重建的患者,IKDC-主观、Lysholm 和 KOOS-运动评分分别为 91±6、92±6 和 93±12,所有患者均恢复到伤前活动水平。对于 MCL 合并 ACL 重建翻修的患者,功能较差,患者无法恢复到伤前的活动水平。
该技术使用异体移植物在股骨上实现骨对骨愈合,需要小切口,并实现等长重建。在与交叉韧带重建一起进行时,可在 2 至 5 年随访时恢复膝关节稳定性。对于 MCL 合并初次 ACL 重建的患者,在娱乐运动员中可恢复到伤前活动水平。