Klatskin-mimicking lesions: still a diagnostical and therapeutical dilemma?

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The preoperative as well as the intraoperative differentiation between Klatskin-mimicking lesions and malignant bile duct tumors at hilar bifurcation is still challenging. Our intention was to review the preoperative diagnostics including preoperative CA19-9 and bilirubin serum levels to compare benign and malignant tumors.

METHODOLOGY

We analyzed our prospectively established bile duct tumor database. From 1999 to 2008, 238 patients suspicious for hilar cholangiocarcinoma underwent surgery. In 24 patients the postoperative histological diagnosis showed a Klatskin-mimicking lesion. The histological report from 20 out of the 24 patients showed a chronic inflammatory transformation of the bile ducts. The histology of two patients showed a primary sclerosing cholangitis and the histological examination of the two remaining patients diagnosed a sarcoidosis of the extrahepatic bile duct.

RESULTS

Reassessment of preoperative diagnostics did not deliver any change of interpretation of the tumors' dignity compared to how it had been assessed preoperatively. Also, preoperative CA19-9 serum levels do not show a statistically reliable differentiation between benign or malignant dignity.

CONCLUSION

Current diagnostics cannot differentiate malignant from benign tumor masses in the hepatic hilum with the necessitated reliability. Therefore surgical resection of suspect hilar tumors is still the only appropriate therapy.