• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

危机资源管理培训对模拟心肺复苏期间无血流时间和团队成员言语表达的积极影响:一项随机对照试验。

Positive impact of crisis resource management training on no-flow time and team member verbalisations during simulated cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Social and Communication Psychology, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Gosslerstrasse 14, Germany.

出版信息

Resuscitation. 2011 Oct;82(10):1338-43. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.05.009. Epub 2011 May 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.05.009
PMID:21664757
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the impact of video-based interactive crisis resource management (CRM) training on no-flow time (NFT) and on proportions of team member verbalisations (TMV) during simulated cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Further, to investigate the link between team leader verbalisation accuracy and NFT.

METHODS

The randomised controlled study was embedded in the obligatory advanced life support (ALS) course for final-year medical students. Students (176; 25.35±1.03 years, 63% female) were alphabetically assigned to 44 four-person teams that were then randomly (computer-generated) assigned to either CRM intervention (n=26), receiving interactive video-based CRM-training, or to control intervention (n=18), receiving an additional ALS-training. Primary outcomes were NFT and proportions of TMV, which were subdivided into eight categories: four team leader verbalisations (TLV) with different accuracy levels and four follower verbalisation categories (FV). Measurements were made of all groups administering simulated adult CPR.

RESULTS

NFT rates were significantly lower in the CRM-training group (31.4±6.1% vs. 36.3±6.6%, p=0.014). Proportions of all TLV categories were higher in the CRM-training group (p<0.001). Differences in FV were only found for one category (unsolicited information) (p=0.012). The highest correlation with NFT was found for high accuracy TLV (direct orders) (p=0.06).

CONCLUSIONS

The inclusion of CRM training in undergraduate medical education reduces NFT in simulated CPR and improves TLV proportions during simulated CPR. Further research will test how these results translate into clinical performance and patient outcome.

摘要

目的

评估基于视频的互动式危机资源管理(CRM)培训对模拟心肺复苏术(CPR)中无血流时间(NFT)和团队成员言语表达(TMV)比例的影响。此外,还研究了团队领导言语表达准确性与 NFT 之间的联系。

方法

该随机对照研究嵌入在最后一年医学生必修的高级生命支持(ALS)课程中。学生(176 名;25.35±1.03 岁,63%为女性)按字母顺序分配到 44 个四人小组中,然后随机(通过计算机生成)分配到 CRM 干预组(n=26)或对照组(n=18)。CRM 干预组接受互动式基于视频的 CRM 培训,对照组接受额外的 ALS 培训。主要结局指标是 NFT 和 TMV 比例,后者细分为八个类别:四个具有不同准确性水平的团队领导言语表达(TLV)和四个追随者言语表达类别(FV)。所有组均对模拟成人 CPR 进行了测量。

结果

CRM 培训组的 NFT 率明显较低(31.4±6.1%比 36.3±6.6%,p=0.014)。CRM 培训组的所有 TLV 类别的比例均较高(p<0.001)。仅在一个类别(未经请求的信息)中发现 FV 存在差异(p=0.012)。与 NFT 相关性最高的是高准确性 TLV(直接命令)(p=0.06)。

结论

在本科医学教育中纳入 CRM 培训可减少模拟 CPR 中的 NFT,并提高模拟 CPR 期间的 TLV 比例。进一步的研究将测试这些结果如何转化为临床表现和患者结局。

相似文献

1
Positive impact of crisis resource management training on no-flow time and team member verbalisations during simulated cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomised controlled trial.危机资源管理培训对模拟心肺复苏期间无血流时间和团队成员言语表达的积极影响:一项随机对照试验。
Resuscitation. 2011 Oct;82(10):1338-43. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.05.009. Epub 2011 May 25.
2
Effect of CRM team leader training on team performance and leadership behavior in simulated cardiac arrest scenarios: a prospective, randomized, controlled study.模拟心脏骤停场景中CRM团队领导者培训对团队绩效和领导行为的影响:一项前瞻性、随机、对照研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2015 Jul 24;15:116. doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0389-z.
3
Targeted crisis resource management training improves performance among randomized nursing and medical students.目标危机资源管理培训提高了随机选择的护理和医学生的表现。
Simul Healthc. 2011 Dec;6(6):316-26. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e31822bc676.
4
Brief leadership instructions improve cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a high-fidelity simulation: a randomized controlled trial.简短的领导力指导可提高高保真模拟心肺复苏中的表现:一项随机对照试验。
Crit Care Med. 2010 Apr;38(4):1086-91. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181cf7383.
5
Impact of simulator training and crew resource management training on final-year medical students' performance in sepsis resuscitation: a randomized trial.模拟培训和团队资源管理培训对医学生脓毒症复苏表现的影响:一项随机试验。
Minerva Anestesiol. 2012 Aug;78(8):901-9. Epub 2012 Apr 13.
6
Simulation-based training delivered directly to the pediatric cardiac intensive care unit engenders preparedness, comfort, and decreased anxiety among multidisciplinary resuscitation teams.基于模拟的培训直接送到儿科心脏重症监护病房,使多学科复苏团队能够做好准备、感到舒适,并降低焦虑。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 Sep;140(3):646-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.04.027. Epub 2010 Jun 8.
7
Effects of script-based role play in cardiopulmonary resuscitation team training.脚本式角色扮演在心肺复苏团队培训中的效果。
Emerg Med J. 2011 Aug;28(8):690-4. doi: 10.1136/emj.2009.090605. Epub 2010 Sep 1.
8
Design, development, and evaluation of an online virtual emergency department for training trauma teams.用于培训创伤团队的在线虚拟急诊科的设计、开发与评估。
Simul Healthc. 2008 Fall;3(3):146-53. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e31817bedf7.
9
Teamwork and leadership in cardiopulmonary resuscitation.心肺复苏中的团队合作和领导力。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Jun 14;57(24):2381-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.03.017.
10
Assessing the impact of immersive simulation on clinical performance during actual in-hospital cardiac arrest with CPR-sensing technology: A randomized feasibility study.评估具有心肺复苏感应技术的沉浸式模拟对实际院内心搏骤停期间临床表现的影响:一项随机可行性研究。
Resuscitation. 2010 Nov;81(11):1556-61. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.05.021. Epub 2010 Aug 17.

引用本文的文献

1
An exploratory study on the effect of rescuer team size on basic and advanced life support technical skills in a high-fidelity simulation of canine cardiopulmonary arrest.在犬类心肺复苏的高保真模拟中,关于救援团队规模对基础及高级生命支持技术技能影响的探索性研究。
J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio). 2025 Jan-Feb;35(1):9-18. doi: 10.1111/vec.13445. Epub 2025 Jan 20.
2
Teaching team competencies within resuscitation training: A systematic review.复苏培训中的教学团队能力:一项系统综述。
Resusc Plus. 2024 Jun 18;19:100687. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100687. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
How to enrich team research in healthcare by considering five theoretical perspectives.
如何通过考虑五个理论视角来丰富医疗保健领域的团队研究。
Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 10;14:1232331. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1232331. eCollection 2023.
4
Telemedical Intensivist Consultation During In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation: A Simulation-Based, Randomized Controlled Trial.远程医疗重症监护会诊在院内心脏骤停复苏中的应用:一项基于模拟的随机对照试验。
Chest. 2022 Jul;162(1):111-119. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2022.01.017. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
5
The Effect of Teaching Nontechnical Skills in Advanced Life Support: A Systematic Review.高级生命支持中传授非技术技能的效果:一项系统评价
AEM Educ Train. 2020 Oct 9;5(3):e10522. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10522. eCollection 2021 Jul.
6
Crisis Leadership Education for Critical Care Fellows. A Longitudinal Curriculum Using Simulation.重症医学专科培训学员的危机领导力教育。基于模拟的纵向课程。
ATS Sch. 2020 Feb 21;1(1):11-19. doi: 10.34197/ats-scholar.2019-0005IN.
7
Are You Prepared to Save a Life? Nursing Students' Experience in Advanced Life Support Practice.你是否准备好拯救生命?护理学生在高级生命支持实践中的体验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 31;18(3):1273. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18031273.
8
Positive communication behaviour during handover and team-based clinical performance in critical situations: a simulation randomised controlled trial.交接过程中的积极沟通行为与危急情况下基于团队的临床绩效:一项模拟随机对照试验。
Br J Anaesth. 2021 Apr;126(4):854-861. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.12.011. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
9
Hands-On Times, Adherence to Recommendations and Variance in Execution among Three Different CPR Algorithms: A Prospective Randomized Single-Blind Simulator-Based Trial.三种不同心肺复苏算法的实操时间、推荐遵循情况和执行差异:一项前瞻性随机单盲基于模拟器的试验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 29;17(21):7946. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17217946.
10
Re-designing a rapid response system: effect on staff experiences and perceptions of rapid response team calls.重新设计快速反应系统:对工作人员在快速反应团队呼叫方面的体验和认知的影响
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 May 29;20(1):480. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05260-z.