• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

循证实践:定性证据的批判性评价。

Evidence-based practice: critical appraisal of qualitative evidence.

机构信息

Center for the Advancement of Evidence-Based Practice, Arizona State University, College of Nursing & Healthcare Innovation, Phoenix, Arizona,

出版信息

J Am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc. 2009 Jun;15(3):202-7. doi: 10.1177/1078390309338733.

DOI:10.1177/1078390309338733
PMID:21665808
Abstract

One of the key steps of evidence-based practice is to critically appraise evidence to best answer a clinical question. Mental health clinicians need to understand the importance of qualitative evidence to their practice, including levels of qualitative evidence, qualitative inquiry methods, and criteria used to appraise qualitative evidence to determine how implementing the best qualitative evidence into their practice will influence mental health outcomes. The goal of qualitative research is to develop a complete understanding of reality as it is perceived by the individual and to uncover the truths that exist. These important aspects of mental health require clinicians to engage this evidence.

摘要

循证实践的关键步骤之一是批判性地评估证据,以最好地回答临床问题。心理健康临床医生需要了解定性证据对其实践的重要性,包括定性证据的水平、定性研究方法以及用于评估定性证据的标准,以确定将最佳定性证据纳入实践将如何影响心理健康结果。定性研究的目的是全面了解个体感知到的现实,并揭示存在的真相。这些心理健康的重要方面需要临床医生关注这些证据。

相似文献

1
Evidence-based practice: critical appraisal of qualitative evidence.循证实践:定性证据的批判性评价。
J Am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc. 2009 Jun;15(3):202-7. doi: 10.1177/1078390309338733.
2
Reducing obesity and related chronic disease risk in children and youth: a synthesis of evidence with 'best practice' recommendations.降低儿童和青少年肥胖及相关慢性病风险:证据综合与“最佳实践”建议
Obes Rev. 2006 Feb;7 Suppl 1:7-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2006.00242.x.
3
Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.德国药品效益评估的程序和方法。
Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Nov;9 Suppl 1:5-29. doi: 10.1007/s10198-008-0122-5.
4
[Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].[德国药品效益评估的程序和方法]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008 Dec;133 Suppl 7:S225-46. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1100954. Epub 2008 Nov 25.
5
Attitudes and knowledge of primary care professionals towards evidence-based practice: a postal survey.基层医疗专业人员对循证实践的态度与知识:一项邮寄调查
J Eval Clin Pract. 2004 May;10(2):197-205. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2003.00458.x.
6
Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management, part I: introduction and general considerations.介入性疼痛管理中的循证医学、系统评价和指南,第一部分:引言与一般考虑因素
Pain Physician. 2008 Mar-Apr;11(2):161-86.
7
A hierarchy of evidence for assessing qualitative health research.评估定性健康研究的证据等级
J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Jan;60(1):43-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.014. Epub 2006 Sep 28.
8
How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?“护理路径技术”对卒中护理服务整合的影响是如何衡量的,以及有哪些证据支持其在这方面的有效性?
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Mar;6(1):78-110. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2007.00098.x.
9
Key steps in implementing evidence-based practice: asking compelling, searchable questions and searching for the best evidence.实施循证实践的关键步骤:提出引人关注、可检索的问题并寻找最佳证据。
Pediatr Nurs. 2002 May-Jun;28(3):262-3, 266.
10
Addressing the threat of evidence-based practice to qualitative inquiry through increasing attention to quality: a discussion paper.通过更多关注质量应对循证实践对质性研究的威胁:一篇讨论论文
Int J Nurs Stud. 2008 Feb;45(2):316-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2007.01.012. Epub 2007 Mar 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Knowledge of infection prevention and control among healthcare workers and factors influencing compliance: a systematic review.医护人员感染预防与控制知识及影响依从性因素的研究:系统综述
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2021 Jun 3;10(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s13756-021-00957-0.
2
Perceptions of nursery staff and parent views of healthy eating promotion in preschool settings: an exploratory qualitative study.幼儿园工作人员对学前教育机构中促进健康饮食的看法及家长观点:一项探索性定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Aug 19;16(1):841. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3507-x.
3
Do expert assessments converge? An exploratory case study of evaluating and managing a blood supply risk.
专家评估是否趋同?评估和管理血液供应风险的探索性案例研究。
BMC Public Health. 2011 Aug 24;11:666. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-666.