• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高剂量右美托咪定在重症监护病房镇静中的应用:临床疗效和安全性评价。

High-dose dexmedetomidine for sedation in the intensive care unit: an evaluation of clinical efficacy and safety.

机构信息

The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.

出版信息

Ann Pharmacother. 2011 Jun;45(6):740-7. doi: 10.1345/aph.1P726. Epub 2011 Jun 10.

DOI:10.1345/aph.1P726
PMID:21666095
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dexmedetomidine is an α(2)-receptor agonist used for sedation in the intensive care unit (ICU). Although dexmedetomidine is labeled for sedation in critically ill patients at doses up to 0.7 μg/kg/h, recent studies have used more liberal dosing regimens. However, to our knowledge, no study has assessed the clinical impact of doses greater than 0.7 μg/kg/h when compared to doses within the Food and Drug Administration--approved labeling.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of high (HD) and low (LD) doses of dexmedetomidine for sedation in the ICU.

METHODS

This retrospective study included a sample of patients who received dexmedetomidine in medical, surgical, medical/surgical, and cardiothoracic ICUs between January 1, 2008, and December 1, 2009. Patients were included in the LD group if their maximum dose was less than 0.7 μg/kg/h or in the HD group if any dose was more than 0.7 μg/kg/h. Efficacy was determined by the percentage of Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale (RASS) scores for each patient maintained at goal sedation (-1 to +1), and safety was determined by the incidence of hypotension and bradycardia.

RESULTS

Forty-three of 133 patients received HD dexmedetomidine. Patients in the LD group had a significantly higher percentage of RASS scores at goal (60.0% vs 48.6%; p = 0.03), while those in the HD group experienced a higher percentage of RASS scores classified as undersedated (19.2% vs 4.9%; p = 0.001). There was no significant difference in the incidence of hypotension or bradycardia between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients treated with HD dexmedetomidine had fewer RASS scores at goal. Our data suggest that increasing the dose of dexmedetomidine may not enhance sedation efficacy or lead to an increased incidence of adverse effects. Patients who have not achieved goal sedation at doses of 0.7 μg/kg/h or less may not respond further to increased doses.

摘要

背景

右美托咪定是一种用于重症监护病房(ICU)镇静的 α(2)-受体激动剂。虽然右美托咪定在标签上注明可用于危重症患者镇静,剂量高达 0.7μg/kg/h,但最近的研究使用了更宽松的给药方案。然而,据我们所知,尚无研究评估与食品和药物管理局批准的标签内剂量相比,剂量大于 0.7μg/kg/h 的临床影响。

目的

比较 ICU 中高(HD)和低(LD)剂量右美托咪定镇静的临床疗效和安全性。

方法

这项回顾性研究纳入了 2008 年 1 月 1 日至 2009 年 12 月 1 日期间在医学、外科、医学/外科和心胸 ICU 接受右美托咪定治疗的患者样本。如果患者的最大剂量小于 0.7μg/kg/h,则纳入 LD 组,如果任何剂量大于 0.7μg/kg/h,则纳入 HD 组。通过每位患者维持目标镇静(-1 至+1)的 Richmond 躁动镇静量表(RASS)评分的百分比来确定疗效,通过低血压和心动过缓的发生率来确定安全性。

结果

在 133 例患者中,有 43 例接受了 HD 右美托咪定治疗。LD 组的患者达到目标的 RASS 评分百分比显著更高(60.0%比 48.6%;p=0.03),而 HD 组的患者中被评为镇静不足的 RASS 评分百分比更高(19.2%比 4.9%;p=0.001)。两组之间低血压或心动过缓的发生率无显著差异。

结论

接受 HD 右美托咪定治疗的患者达到目标的 RASS 评分百分比更少。我们的数据表明,增加右美托咪定的剂量可能不会增强镇静效果,也不会导致不良反应发生率增加。在 0.7μg/kg/h 或更低剂量下未达到目标镇静的患者可能不会对增加的剂量有进一步的反应。

相似文献

1
High-dose dexmedetomidine for sedation in the intensive care unit: an evaluation of clinical efficacy and safety.高剂量右美托咪定在重症监护病房镇静中的应用:临床疗效和安全性评价。
Ann Pharmacother. 2011 Jun;45(6):740-7. doi: 10.1345/aph.1P726. Epub 2011 Jun 10.
2
Evaluation of dexmedetomidine therapy for sedation in patients with toxicological events at an academic medical center.评价在学术医疗中心发生中毒事件的患者应用右美托咪定镇静治疗的效果。
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2014 Jun;52(5):525-30. doi: 10.3109/15563650.2014.913175. Epub 2014 May 5.
3
A phase II study to evaluate the efficacy of dexmedetomidine for sedation in the medical intensive care unit.一项评估右美托咪定在医学重症监护病房用于镇静效果的II期研究。
Intensive Care Med. 2003 Feb;29(2):201-7. doi: 10.1007/s00134-002-1579-9. Epub 2002 Nov 22.
4
Use of dexmedetomidine in the pediatric intensive care unit.右美托咪定在儿科重症监护病房的应用。
Pharmacotherapy. 2008 Jan;28(1):51-7. doi: 10.1592/phco.28.1.51.
5
Adjunctive dexmedetomidine therapy in the intensive care unit: a retrospective assessment of impact on sedative and analgesic requirements, levels of sedation and analgesia, and ventilatory and hemodynamic parameters.重症监护病房中右美托咪定辅助治疗:对镇静和镇痛需求、镇静和镇痛水平以及通气和血流动力学参数影响的回顾性评估
Pharmacotherapy. 2007 Mar;27(3):351-9. doi: 10.1592/phco.27.3.351.
6
The role of the alpha2-adrenoceptor agonist dexmedetomidine in postsurgical sedation in the intensive care unit.α2肾上腺素能受体激动剂右美托咪定在重症监护病房术后镇静中的作用。
J Intensive Care Med. 2003 Jan-Feb;18(1):29-41. doi: 10.1177/0885066602239122.
7
Dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for sedation of critically ill patients: a randomized trial.右美托咪定与咪达唑仑用于重症患者镇静的随机试验
JAMA. 2009 Feb 4;301(5):489-99. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.56. Epub 2009 Feb 2.
8
Clinical sedation scores as indicators of sedative and analgesic drug exposure in intensive care unit patients.临床镇静评分作为重症监护病房患者镇静和镇痛药物暴露的指标。
Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2007 Sep;5(3):218-31. doi: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2007.10.005.
9
Early goal-directed sedation versus standard sedation in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients: a pilot study*.早期目标导向镇静与机械通气危重症患者常规镇静的比较:一项初步研究*。
Crit Care Med. 2013 Aug;41(8):1983-91. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31828a437d.
10
Pain, fentanyl consumption, and delirium in adolescents after scoliosis surgery: dexmedetomidine vs midazolam.青少年脊柱侧弯手术后的疼痛、芬太尼用量及谵妄:右美托咪定与咪达唑仑的比较
Paediatr Anaesth. 2013 May;23(5):446-52. doi: 10.1111/pan.12128. Epub 2013 Feb 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Reinforcement learning model for optimizing dexmedetomidine dosing to prevent delirium in critically ill patients.用于优化右美托咪定给药剂量以预防重症患者谵妄的强化学习模型
NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Nov 18;7(1):325. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01335-x.
2
Perioperative Hypotension in Patients Undergoing Orthopedic Upper Extremity Surgery with Dexmedetomidine Sedation: A Retrospective Study.右美托咪定镇静下接受上肢骨科手术患者围手术期低血压:一项回顾性研究
J Pers Med. 2023 Nov 28;13(12):1658. doi: 10.3390/jpm13121658.
3
A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Efficacy and Safety of Dexmedetomidine Combined With Intrathecal Bupivacaine Compared to Placebo.
与安慰剂相比,右美托咪定联合鞘内注射布比卡因疗效和安全性的系统评价与Meta分析
Cureus. 2022 Dec 12;14(12):e32425. doi: 10.7759/cureus.32425. eCollection 2022 Dec.
4
Association of intraoperative dexmedetomidine use with postoperative hypotension in unilateral hip and knee arthroplasties: a historical cohort study.单侧髋关节和膝关节置换术中使用右美托咪定与术后低血压的关联:一项历史性队列研究
Can J Anaesth. 2022 Dec;69(12):1459-1470. doi: 10.1007/s12630-022-02339-5. Epub 2022 Oct 12.
5
Standard- versus High-Dose Dexmedetomidine for Sedation in the Intensive Care Unit.重症监护病房中标准剂量与高剂量右美托咪定用于镇静的比较
Hosp Pharm. 2022 Apr;57(2):281-286. doi: 10.1177/00185787211029552. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
6
Bradycardia resulting in cardiac arrest in a critically ill patient receiving dexmedetomidine.在一名接受右美托咪定治疗的危重症患者中,心动过缓导致心脏骤停。
Trauma Case Rep. 2021 Oct 25;36:100548. doi: 10.1016/j.tcr.2021.100548. eCollection 2021 Dec.
7
Dexmedetomidine in the cardiac intensive care unit: still no simple answers to a complex problem.右美托咪定在心脏重症监护病房:复杂问题仍无简单答案。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2021 May 25;10(4):369-371. doi: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuab017.
8
Circulatory effects of dexmedetomidine in early sepsis: a randomised controlled experimental study.早期脓毒症中右美托咪定的循环效应:一项随机对照实验研究。
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2020 Jan;393(1):89-97. doi: 10.1007/s00210-019-01713-3. Epub 2019 Aug 17.
9
Dexmedetomidine inhibits the lipopolysaccharide-stimulated inflammatory response in microglia through the pathway involving TLR4 and NF-κB.右美托咪定通过 TLR4 和 NF-κB 通路抑制小胶质细胞脂多糖刺激的炎症反应。
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2019 Dec;35(12):750-756. doi: 10.1002/kjm2.12112. Epub 2019 Aug 16.
10
Comparative evaluation of intrathecal bupivacaine alone and bupivacaine combined with dexmedetomidine in cesarean section using spinal anesthesia: a meta-analysis.剖宫产蛛网膜下腔麻醉中单纯鞘内注射布比卡因与布比卡因联合右美托咪定的比较评价:一项荟萃分析。
J Int Med Res. 2019 Jul;47(7):2785-2799. doi: 10.1177/0300060518797000. Epub 2019 Jun 17.