Van Berkel Patel Megan, Bolton Spencer, Hamilton Cassie
Erlanger Health System, Chattanooga, TN, USA.
Clark Regional Medical Center, Winchester, KY, USA.
Hosp Pharm. 2022 Apr;57(2):281-286. doi: 10.1177/00185787211029552. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
Dexmedetomidine is a commonly used sedative in the intensive care unit (ICU), however the use of higher, off label dosing has yet to be elucidated. A dose limitation protocol was implemented at our institution allowing for comparison of dexmedetomidine doses. The purpose of this study is to evaluate time spent within goal Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) range with standard-dosing of dexmedetomidine ≤1 mcg/kg/hour (SD group) compared to high-dose >1 mcg/kg/hour (HD group). Secondary outcomes included days requiring mechanical ventilation, concomitant sedation, and incidence of hypotension or bradycardia. This retrospective chart review of adult ICU patients at a single academic medical center included patients who required at least 24 hours of mechanical ventilation and received dexmedetomidine monotherapy for at least 4 hours. Patients were excluded for intubations at an outside hospital, continuous neuromuscular blocking infusions, or Glasgow Coma Score ≤4. A total of 144 patients met inclusion criteria (n = 121 SD group and n = 23 HD group). The SD group spent a greater time within goal RASS range compared to the HD group (84.5% [IQR 47-100] vs 45.5% [IQR 30.1-85.4], = .013). The SD group also had shorter durations of both dexmedetomidine infusion and mechanical ventilation, and required less concomitant sedation. There was no difference in hypotension or bradycardia. This study further adds to the literature that administration of high-dose dexmedetomidine does not appear to confer additional benefit over standard doses for ICU patients requiring mechanical ventilation. Application of this data may support lower institutional maximum doses.
右美托咪定是重症监护病房(ICU)常用的镇静剂,然而更高剂量的超说明书用药情况尚未阐明。我们机构实施了一项剂量限制方案,以便比较右美托咪定的剂量。本研究的目的是评估与高剂量>1 mcg/kg/小时(HD组)相比,右美托咪定标准剂量≤1 mcg/kg/小时(SD组)在目标里士满躁动镇静量表(RASS)范围内的时间。次要结局包括需要机械通气的天数、联合使用镇静剂情况以及低血压或心动过缓的发生率。这项对单一学术医学中心成年ICU患者的回顾性病历审查纳入了至少需要24小时机械通气且接受右美托咪定单药治疗至少4小时的患者。排除在外院插管、持续输注神经肌肉阻滞剂或格拉斯哥昏迷评分≤4的患者。共有144例患者符合纳入标准(n = 121例SD组和n = 23例HD组)。与HD组相比,SD组在目标RASS范围内的时间更长(84.5% [四分位间距47 - 100] 对45.5% [四分位间距30.1 - 85.4],P = 0.013)。SD组右美托咪定输注时间和机械通气时间也更短,且联合使用镇静剂的需求更少。低血压或心动过缓方面无差异。这项研究进一步补充了文献,表明对于需要机械通气的ICU患者,高剂量右美托咪定给药似乎并不比标准剂量带来更多益处。应用这些数据可能支持降低机构的最大剂量。