Department of Medicine, Dentistry and Health sciences, The University of Melbourne, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Poplar Road, Parkville, Melbourne, VIC-3052, Australia.
J Rehabil Med. 2011 Jun;43(7):638-46. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0826.
To assess the effectiveness of a high- vs low--intensity multidisciplinary ambulatory rehabilitation programme over 12 months for persons in the chronic phase after Guillain-Barré syndrome (pwGBS) in an Australian community cohort.
A total of 79 pwGBS, recruited from a tertiary hospital, were randomized to a treatment group (n = 40) for an individualized high-intensity programme, or a control group (n = 39) for a lower intensity programme. The primary outcome the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) motor subscale assessed "activity limitation"; while secondary measures for "participation" included: World Health Organization Quality of Life; Depression, Anxiety Stress Scale; and Perceived Impact Problem Profile (PIPP) scales. All outcome measures were assessed at baseline and at 12 months.
Intention to treat analysis of data from 69 participants (treatment n = 35, control n = 34) showed reduced disability in the treatment group in post-treatment FIM domains (mobility, transfers, sphincter control and locomotion; all p < 0.005) and PIPP scores (relationships; p = 0.011), with moderate-to-small effect sizes (r = 0.36-0.23). The treatment group compared with control group showed significant improvement in function (FIM scores): 68% vs 32%.
Higher intensity rehabilitation compared with less intense intervention reduces disability in pwGBS in later stages of recovery. Further information on rehabilitation modalities and impact on quality of life is needed.
在澳大利亚社区队列中,评估为期 12 个月的高强度与低强度多学科门诊康复方案对吉兰-巴雷综合征(GBS)慢性期患者的疗效。
共纳入 79 名来自三级医院的 GBS 患者,随机分为治疗组(n=40)接受个体化高强度方案,或对照组(n=39)接受低强度方案。主要结局为功能独立性测量(FIM)运动分量表评估的“活动受限”;而“参与”的次要测量指标包括:世界卫生组织生活质量量表;抑郁、焦虑和压力量表;以及感知影响问题量表(PIPP)。所有结局指标均在基线和 12 个月时进行评估。
对 69 名参与者(治疗组 n=35,对照组 n=34)的数据进行意向治疗分析显示,治疗组在治疗后 FIM 领域(移动、转移、括约肌控制和运动;均 p<0.005)和 PIPP 评分(人际关系;p=0.011)中残疾程度降低,具有中至小的效应大小(r=0.36-0.23)。与对照组相比,治疗组在功能(FIM 评分)方面有显著改善:68%对 32%。
与低强度干预相比,高强度康复可降低恢复期后期 GBS 患者的残疾程度。需要进一步了解康复方式及其对生活质量的影响。