[Immunoadsorption for steroid-unresponsive multiple sclerosis-relapses: clinical data of 14 patients].

BACKGROUND

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory demyelinating immune-mediated disease of the central nervous system, often associated with relapses. Plasma exchange (PE) has become established as an escalation therapy for steroid-unresponsive relapses in national and international guidelines. PE is a non-selective apheresis method with elimination of the entire plasma with subsequent substitution. Selective extracorporeal elimination of autoantibodies and immune complexes with immunoadsorption (IA) is increasingly replacing PE for the treatment of autoimmune neurological diseases due to its equivalent efficacy and advantageous safety profile. The use of IA for MS still remains to become established. The aim of this retrospective investigation was to evaluate efficacy and safety of IA in patients with steroid-unresponsive relapses.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fourteen patients with steroid-unresponsive MS relapses were retrospectively analysed. Patients received six IA treatments within 2 weeks using the single-use tryptophan adsorber. Peripheral venous access was used in 11 patients, and 3 patients needed a central line. The plasma volume treated was 2 l per IA. Efficacy criteria were improvement in symptoms of MS relapses which were measured with the Kurtzke scale (EDSS, FS) and visual acuity measurements for patients with optic neuritis.

RESULTS

In 12 of 14 patients the major symptom of MS relapse improved to a clinically relevant extent after tryptophan IA; no patient got worse, corresponding to a response rate of 86%. Mean EDSS and FS in patients with spastic paresis (n=4) and dizziness (n=2) as well as mean visual acuity in patients with optic neuritis (n=8) significantly improved after IA. IA treatments were safe, with good tolerability, and no severe adverse events occurred.

CONCLUSION

Immunoadsorption for the treatment of steroid-unresponsive MS relapses was safe and effective. The response rate was comparable to published results with PE. With IA, in contrast to unselective PE, administration of human plasma products is not necessary, avoiding associated risks.