Division of Counseling and Educational Psychology, University of Missouri-Kansas City, 64110, USA.
Percept Mot Skills. 2011 Apr;112(2):331-48. doi: 10.2466/03.11.PMS.112.2.331-348.
The American Psychological Association (APA) Task Force on Statistical Inference was formed in 1996 in response to a growing body of research demonstrating methodological issues that threatened the credibility of psychological research, and made recommendations to address them. One issue was the small, even dramatically inadequate, size of samples used in studies published by leading journals. The present study assessed the progress made since the Task Force's final report in 1999. Sample sizes reported in four leading APA journals in 1955, 1977, 1995, and 2006 were compared using nonparametric statistics, while data from the last two waves were fit to a hierarchical generalized linear growth model for more in-depth analysis. Overall, results indicate that the recommendations for increasing sample sizes have not been integrated in core psychological research, although results slightly vary by field. This and other implications are discussed in the context of current methodological critique and practice.
美国心理协会(APA)统计推理工作组于 1996 年成立,旨在应对越来越多的研究表明存在方法学问题,这些问题威胁到心理学研究的可信度,并提出了解决这些问题的建议。其中一个问题是,发表在主要期刊上的研究中使用的样本量很小,甚至严重不足。本研究评估了自工作组 1999 年发布最终报告以来所取得的进展。使用非参数统计方法比较了 1955 年、1977 年、1995 年和 2006 年在四个主要 APA 期刊上报告的样本量,而最后两波的数据则拟合到层次广义线性增长模型中,以进行更深入的分析。总体而言,结果表明,增加样本量的建议尚未纳入核心心理学研究,尽管不同领域的结果略有不同。在当前方法学批评和实践的背景下讨论了这一结果和其他影响。