• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

四种体外检测方法用于预测化学品皮肤致敏性的实验室内部验证。

Intralaboratory validation of four in vitro assays for the prediction of the skin sensitizing potential of chemicals.

机构信息

BASF SE, Experimental Toxicology and Ecology, Germany.

出版信息

Toxicol In Vitro. 2011 Sep;25(6):1162-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2011.05.030. Epub 2011 Jun 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.tiv.2011.05.030
PMID:21669280
Abstract

Allergic contact dermatitis is induced by repeated skin contact with an allergen. Assessment of the skin sensitizing potential of chemicals, agrochemicals, and especially cosmetic ingredients is currently performed with the use of animals. Animal welfare and EU legislation demand animal-free alternatives reflected in a testing and marketing ban for cosmetic ingredients beginning in 2013. The underlying mechanisms of induction and elicitation of skin sensitization are complex and a chemical needs to comply several properties being skin sensitizing. To account for the multitude of events in the induction of skin sensitization an in vitro test system will consist of a battery of various tests. Currently, we performed intralaboratory validations of four assays addressing three different events during induction of skin sensitization. (1) The Direct Peptide Reactivity Assay (DPRA) according to Gerberick and co-workers (Gerberick et al., 2004) using synthetic peptides and HPLC analysis. (2) Two dendritic cell activation assays based on the dendritic cell like cell lines U-937 and THP-1 and flow cytometric detection of the maturation markers CD54 and/or CD86 (Ashikaga et al., 2006; Python et al., 2007; Sakaguchi et al., 2006). (3) Antioxidant response element (ARE)-dependent gene activity in a HaCaT reporter gene cell line (Emter et al., 2010). We present the results of our intralaboratory validation of these assays with 23 substances of known sensitizing potential. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the individual tests were obtained by comparison to human epidemiological data as well as to data from animal tests such as the local lymph node assay.

摘要

变应性接触性皮炎是由过敏原反复接触皮肤引起的。目前,化学物质、农药和特别是化妆品成分的皮肤致敏潜力评估是使用动物进行的。动物福利和欧盟立法要求使用无动物替代方法,这反映在 2013 年开始对化妆品成分进行测试和销售禁令。皮肤致敏的诱导和激发的潜在机制很复杂,一种化学物质需要符合多种皮肤致敏的特性。为了考虑到皮肤致敏诱导中的多种事件,体外测试系统将由各种测试组成。目前,我们对四个检测方法进行了实验室内部验证,这些方法涉及皮肤致敏诱导过程中的三个不同事件。(1)根据 Gerberick 等人的直接肽反应测定法(DPRA)(Gerberick 等人,2004),使用合成肽和 HPLC 分析。(2)两种基于树突状细胞样细胞系 U-937 和 THP-1 的树突状细胞激活测定法,以及成熟标志物 CD54 和/或 CD86 的流式细胞术检测(Ashikaga 等人,2006;Python 等人,2007;Sakaguchi 等人,2006)。(3)在 HaCaT 报告基因细胞系中抗氧化反应元件(ARE)依赖性基因活性(Emter 等人,2010)。我们介绍了这些方法的实验室内部验证结果,涉及 23 种已知致敏潜力的物质。通过与人类流行病学数据以及动物测试(如局部淋巴结测定)的数据进行比较,获得了各个测试的灵敏度、特异性和准确性。

相似文献

1
Intralaboratory validation of four in vitro assays for the prediction of the skin sensitizing potential of chemicals.四种体外检测方法用于预测化学品皮肤致敏性的实验室内部验证。
Toxicol In Vitro. 2011 Sep;25(6):1162-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2011.05.030. Epub 2011 Jun 7.
2
Putting the parts together: combining in vitro methods to test for skin sensitizing potentials.将各部分组合在一起:结合体外方法测试皮肤致敏潜能。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2012 Aug;63(3):489-504. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2012.05.013. Epub 2012 Jun 1.
3
The relationship between CD86/CD54 expression and THP-1 cell viability in an in vitro skin sensitization test--human cell line activation test (h-CLAT).体外皮肤致敏试验——人细胞系激活试验(h-CLAT)中CD86/CD54表达与THP-1细胞活力的关系
Cell Biol Toxicol. 2009 Apr;25(2):109-26. doi: 10.1007/s10565-008-9059-9. Epub 2008 Jan 19.
4
Filling the concept with data: integrating data from different in vitro and in silico assays on skin sensitizers to explore the battery approach for animal-free skin sensitization testing.用数据充实概念:整合来自不同体外和计算机模拟试验的皮肤致敏剂数据,以探索无动物皮肤致敏性测试的组合方法。
Toxicol Sci. 2009 Jan;107(1):106-21. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfn204. Epub 2008 Oct 1.
5
Cross talk between keratinocytes and dendritic cells: impact on the prediction of sensitization.角质形成细胞和树突状细胞之间的串扰:对致敏预测的影响。
Toxicol Sci. 2011 Oct;123(2):501-10. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfr174. Epub 2011 Jul 8.
6
Expression of surface markers on the human monocytic leukaemia cell line, THP-1, as indicators for the sensitizing potential of chemicals.人单核细胞白血病细胞系THP-1表面标志物的表达作为化学物质致敏潜力的指标。
Contact Dermatitis. 2009 Apr;60(4):185-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2009.01528.x.
7
A loose-fit coculture of activated keratinocytes and dendritic cell-related cells for prediction of sensitizing potential.用于预测致敏潜力的活化角质形成细胞与树突状细胞相关细胞的宽松共培养。
Allergy. 2007 Dec;62(12):1419-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2007.01511.x.
8
Development of an in vitro skin sensitization test using human cell lines; human Cell Line Activation Test (h-CLAT). II. An inter-laboratory study of the h-CLAT.使用人细胞系开发体外皮肤致敏试验;人细胞系激活试验(h-CLAT)。II. h-CLAT的实验室间研究。
Toxicol In Vitro. 2006 Aug;20(5):774-84. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2005.10.014. Epub 2005 Dec 7.
9
Use of in vitro testing to identify an unexpected skin sensitizing impurity in a commercial product: a case study.使用体外测试鉴定商业产品中的意外致敏性杂质:案例研究。
Toxicol In Vitro. 2010 Mar;24(2):411-6. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2009.10.015. Epub 2009 Oct 31.
10
Identifying and characterizing chemical skin sensitizers without animal testing: Colipa's research and method development program.在不进行动物测试的情况下识别和表征化学皮肤致敏物:欧洲化妆品协会的研究和方法开发计划。
Toxicol In Vitro. 2010 Sep;24(6):1465-73. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2010.07.005. Epub 2010 Jul 17.

引用本文的文献

1
In Vitro and In Vivo Methods for Analysis of Nanoparticles' Potential to Induce Delayed-Type Hypersensitivity Reactions.用于分析纳米颗粒诱导迟发型超敏反应潜力的体外和体内方法。
Methods Mol Biol. 2024;2789:193-207. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3786-9_20.
2
Artificial Intelligence That Predicts Sensitizing Potential of Cosmetic Ingredients with Accuracy Comparable to Animal and In Vitro Tests-How Does the Infotechnomics Compare to Other "Omics" in the Cosmetics Safety Assessment?人工智能预测化妆品成分致敏潜力的准确性可与动物和体外试验相媲美——Infotechnomics 与化妆品安全评估中的其他“组学”相比如何?
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Apr 6;24(7):6801. doi: 10.3390/ijms24076801.
3
Allergy in Cancer Care: Antineoplastic Therapy-Induced Hypersensitivity Reactions.
癌症治疗中的过敏反应:抗肿瘤治疗诱导的超敏反应。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Feb 15;24(4):3886. doi: 10.3390/ijms24043886.
4
Evaluation of Antineoplastic Delayed-Type Hypersensitivity Skin Reactions In Vitro.体外抗肿瘤迟发型超敏反应皮肤反应的评估
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2022 Sep 6;15(9):1111. doi: 10.3390/ph15091111.
5
Prediction of Skin Sensitization: ?皮肤致敏预测:?
Front Pharmacol. 2021 May 4;12:655771. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.655771. eCollection 2021.
6
Xenobiotica-metabolizing enzymes in the skin of rat, mouse, pig, guinea pig, man, and in human skin models.大鼠、小鼠、猪、豚鼠、人类和人皮肤模型中的皮肤外源物质代谢酶。
Arch Toxicol. 2018 Aug;92(8):2411-2456. doi: 10.1007/s00204-018-2232-x. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
7
Antioxidant response elements: Discovery, classes, regulation and potential applications.抗氧化反应元件:发现、种类、调控及潜在应用。
Redox Biol. 2018 Jul;17:297-314. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2018.05.002. Epub 2018 May 7.
8
Prediction of skin sensitization potency using machine learning approaches.使用机器学习方法预测皮肤致敏潜力。
J Appl Toxicol. 2017 Jul;37(7):792-805. doi: 10.1002/jat.3424. Epub 2017 Jan 10.
9
Multivariate models for prediction of human skin sensitization hazard.预测人类皮肤致敏危害的多变量模型。
J Appl Toxicol. 2017 Mar;37(3):347-360. doi: 10.1002/jat.3366. Epub 2016 Aug 2.
10
Integrated decision strategies for skin sensitization hazard.皮肤致敏危害的综合决策策略
J Appl Toxicol. 2016 Sep;36(9):1150-62. doi: 10.1002/jat.3281. Epub 2016 Feb 6.